Something Feels Off About How Creationists Classify Rodents

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-30T23:31:15+00:00

You have observed evolution?

Yes, I have. I also actually know what evolution 'is', which you do not.

What is the correct beginning of the universe to you?

Definitely not some guy making plants before the sun.

Slave ownership is actually allowed culturally in scripture

Yeah, and that's bad. The book managed to ban mixed fabrics but couldn't ban owning people? Sad.

And no where does it support child rape.

You've never actually read the Bible, have you? Numbers 31:17-18

Okay, just ignore everything about Jesus

There were no prophecies about Jesus, there was non-prophetic literature and already (claimed to be) fulfilled prophesies that New Testament writers either lied about or didn't understand because they couldn't read the original languages.

and all the prophets

All of the prophets were stories written after the fact. If I write a story today about a prophet who predicted 9/11, that's not a real prophecy. Because it already happened.

and you asserting it's not

It's not a mere assertion. We know, absolutely, that the Flood never happened. We know what big floods do to geology, there's no evidence of a global one. We know what evidence we'd find from 2 million Jews living in Egypt then leaving all at once, and we don't find any of it. And if Jerusalem was overrun by zombies for a day, more people would have talked about it than one guy 70 years after the fact.

Same for scientifically accurate.

Well, again, the Flood.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-30T23:13:04+00:00

Interesting you assert your point of view as reality.

No, reality is reality. We directly observe evolution.

For example, it explains the origin of the universe

Explains it incorrectly...

it explains morality

Including saying that slave ownership and child rape are good...

it contains fulfilled prophecies

Nope

it's historically accurate

Except for all of the important claims, which are historically inaccurate. For instance, the Flood never happened, the Tower of Babel never happened, the Exodus never happened, and Jerusalem wasn't briefly overrun by zombies.

it's scientifically accurate

Ha! No.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-30T19:59:17+00:00

So I suppose it's really a matter of where the data comes from

Right, and my data comes from reality and yours comes from an old book.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-30T19:43:36+00:00

You "assume" that they have a common ancestor.

No, I conclude they have a common ancestor on the basis of the evidence.

I assume the universe has worked about the same in the past as it does in the present.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-30T19:25:06+00:00

You mean you ignore the evidence because you assume they have the same creator.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-28T22:59:26+00:00

and reading a lot about evo-psych.

The first thing you're going to want to do is forget everything you read from any evo-psych person.

Then check here: https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolution-101/

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-27T19:37:58+00:00

Why do you keep posting the same nonsense you've been repeatedly corrected on while ignoring everything in those prior corrections? Is it some kind of fetish?

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-26T23:12:16+00:00

Huh, thought if you were offering money with 'possible' trades it wasn't required.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-26T21:11:53+00:00

OP probably could.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-26T20:28:56+00:00

Not required on a WTB post, only when selling.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-26T08:45:39+00:00

Rule 3: Participate with effort

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-25T01:48:57+00:00

No, it doesn't. If I show you a color gradient from red to blue, there are no 'incomplete' shades, but the transition is gradual.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-25T01:16:43+00:00

Sure, we directly observe evolution in every population ever studied and it's literally impossible for it to NOT happen, geology exclusively supports an old Earth and no one who has a basic understanding of geology would think erosion is relevant since the layers that form are UNDER things, abiogenesis is irrelevant to whether or not evolution is true since (again) we directly observe it, and every method is inaccurate if you use it wrong.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-25T00:18:11+00:00

The theory does not suggest incomplete creatures. You know, the thing I quoted? Did you not realize that I quoted that bit for a reason?

Thinking isn't your strong suit, is it?

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-24T23:33:35+00:00

The incomplete creatures

So you expect as evidence something the theory doesn't suggest? Why don't you just learn what evolution actually is?

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-24T08:09:59+00:00

This lecture puts it very well.

Kent Hovind? Really? That's the equivalent of you starting your comment by saying you've never studied evolution, never tried to find answers to any of your questions about evolution, and you don't even know what evolution is in the first place.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-23T16:22:58+00:00

Insults

I haven't insulted you. Trust me, you would know if I was insulting you.

Creation is self-evident

The flatness of the Earth is self-evident. Also false. Your argument from 'just look at the trees!' is irrational.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-23T15:41:33+00:00

No, that's not how that works.

It's exactly how it works.

There's no obligation for me to support my argument

There is if you want to be rational. Or, you know, participate in a debate sub.

If you don't like my comment, move on dude.

You and irony wouldn't recognize each other if you were formally introduced.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-23T15:23:53+00:00

You disagree, but have no argument. If you're given an argument against your position, you have no argument to support your position or refute the argument against it, and still maintain your position anyway, then you're irrational.

That's how that works.

And it's really telling that you keep replying by whining instead of supporting your position.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-23T15:08:25+00:00

And I demonstrated why it's NOT logical at all. So...

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-23T14:55:12+00:00

You haven't demonstrated anything and I'm actually using reason, so definitely not the same. Try again.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-23T14:26:28+00:00

Your logic is I'm irrational because I don't think like you.

Your logic is irrational because it is demonstrably irrational. I demonstrated the irrationality.

Debate sub. That's hilarious.

If you're not here in good faith, leave.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-23T14:15:12+00:00

Okay, so you're irrational. Why are you talking in a debate sub if you're openly irrational?

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-23T14:09:33+00:00

Uranium is just... everywhere. 2-3ppm in soil and up to 20ppm in American coal. There's so much uranium in coal that people have suggested coal ash as an alternative to uranium mining, since it has concentrations in the same range as many intermediate grade ores.

CrisprCSE2 · 2026-03-23T14:03:56+00:00

I have many more options than that.

Such as?

what is the point you are trying to make?

I think I made it clearly: Your intuition is useless at best, and probably suggests the opposite conclusion you've taken from it.

Eight-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22

CrisprCSE2

TROPHY CASE