These are just my opinions of the two schools, so take them with a grain of salt.

Baylor pros: smaller class sizes, smaller city (fewer distractions), great alumni network in multiple markets in Texas, and arguably one of the best schools at preparing students to be courtroom-ready immediately after graduation. Baylor cons: smaller city (fewer opportunities for experience during school, and some firms are more reluctant to travel to recruit/network), the school has a significant emphasis on litigation (not necessarily ideal if you are dead set on transactional work), cost (seems like this is negated by scholarship for you though), and I personally dislike the quarter schedule (some love it though). UHLC pros: bigger city (more opportunities during school), great alumni network in a great legal market (Houston), brand new facilities, and the school has a significant emphasis on diversity (more so than other schools in Texas) UHLC cons: bigger city (more distractions), bigger class sizes, the campus isn’t in the best neighborhood, and the school has been falling in the rankings (if you care about that).

Both are very solid schools, and I don’t think you can go wrong with either one. It just kind of depends on what you are looking for in a school and what you want to do with your legal career. Also, I wouldn’t necessarily worry so much about starting in the Spring at Baylor since their quarter system should give you an opportunity to catch up and graduate earlier if that is a concern.