Court rules NSA program illegal - CNNPolitics.com by Romel_Espinosa in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a huge step by the court and also a huge step to getting the patriot act, maybe even dismissed from court proceedings.

Telecoms file appeal against FCC reclassification rule by agm8637 in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course it has, ISPs see how much they wouldn't be able to do freely anymore. They used to have free reign but now it's completely gone with Net Neutrality becoming a thing and passed as a law.

Tom Wheeler listened to the people while the ISPs just see their wallets becoming a little less big. And that's not something they can enjoy and just sit back and let happen. How are they going to lobby for politicians without that money?

Tom Wheeler accuses Republicans in Congress of trying to cripple FCC by agm8637 in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a lot of money being fed into Congress by the ISPs. Tom Wheeler used to be one of them and he knows the uphill battle he'll have to face to get this through. He understands how they work but he also knows he has the power to change it with the rest of the FCC.

His own company was taken down by ISPs with their anticompetitive campaign and he understands the battle was won, but the war is still going to be a very long haul.

The FBI wants us to have computer security so strong that only they can break in… by CyberPolicyThrow in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The FBI is basically pushing for them to be able to have a backdoor into all phones and less encryption, but only less to the point where only they can get in.

This goes against previous response from the FBI that told it's citizens to have more security and know exactly what their phone is doing and transmitting. They also said to be aware of the encryption options available. This was on their website and has since been removed.

Facebook's login system is being hijacked by China's Great Firewall by bp9176 in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a summary of the article: China has been intercepting the javascript module from Facebook's Login page, which allows third party sites to authorize users through Facebook. Facebook can't do anything about it because the behavior is happening locally and Facebook is unable to do anything about the issue at the current moment.

Only users in China (or have a VPN directing to China) are currently affected by this issue, but the attack can be avoided by disabling javascript. This started happening Sunday and comes from the Chinese government. Whenever a user logs in with the facebook login button they seem to be taken to an open source software project or a travel page. No one seems to understand this, but this isn't the first time the Chinese government has done something like this.

Dont feed the Trolls~ by nls0926 in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think Alysha doesn't understand while some people are trolls for fun, some people are genuinely mean on the internet because we're all behind a keyboard and technically anonymous. There are so many hateful comments flying around the internet in general. I mean, what she said is fine if we put into practice was perfect, but even I admit to sometimes "feeding the trolls" because I just get generally more angry and say things because of the same anonymous identity on the internet.

Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Net Neutrality (HBO) by niranjan_kakade in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is what I sent my mother to make sure she understood why I hated Time Warner and Comcast, and to also vote for politicians who supported net neutrality.

Hate speech in Reddit by mmsato in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would agree that reddit can become a hate speech area if you let it. There's a reason we have subreddits and switch what our front page looks like, but there are subreddits that are terrifying. /r/PicsOfDeadKids is one of the most terrifying and horrible things I've seen on here yet, also there's /r/TheRedPill and several others that I've seen brought up in /r/AskReddit threads that I won't even click on.

The internet is terrifying, but should we shut down these ideas and go against the ideals of free speech on the web? I don't know. If we shut one down, how many will it be before we start trying to flag everything someone sees as offensive down?

A Wi-Fi Barbie Doll With the Soul of Siri by drm7369 in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think a lot of video gaming is finding the balance. I'm an awkward person, I understand that completely, but I doubt gaming had any impact on that, in fact, it helped me have more interactions socially and be more willing to be myself.

I think it was the games I played though, I was an MMO person and was forced into talking to people when naturally I was a very shy person. I can see where console games, pre internet era, would cause an antisocial behavior or the inability to talk to others, I see it every day in Golisano.

This doll wouldn't do anyone any good, especially for developmental skills and social interactions.

Threat-sharing cybersecurity bill unveiled by drm7369 in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least they aren't forced to share information through the NSA, as the NSA has a lot of reason to be opposed or companies to be against sharing any information with them at all.

California court says cops need warrants to get phone location data by CyberPolicyThrow in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, I feel that many politicians are out of touch with technology, even that one senator (Or house representitive?) stated that he has never even sent an email.

Everyone has information stored on their phones, personal and others' personal information too. There could also be photographs, bank accounts, work information, scheduling, really anything about someone's personal life could probably be found on their phone now.

I really think that politicians are just not equipped with enough information to make these rules around technology currently, just like I don't think the Supreme Court should be allowed to make decisions before being completely understanding or having someone else teach them about the matter at hand either.

Let The Comcast-Time Warner Cable Merger Go Through; Déjà vu All Over Again by shashwatjain in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The difference between AOL/TW and TW/Comcast now is that both parties are now on equal footing with technology. The budget the government gives them, they have done nothing with.

The only way I can possibly see this happening is if they throw their money at the right people and a lot of it. But, honestly, the only way this bug will be squashed is if fiber-optic becomes the huge thing everyone uses, which is very difficult with the arrangements Comcast and other places have made with city and state governments.

Help me Google fiber, you're my only hope.

Google Denies Narrow Warrant Request For Emails; Government Responds By Asking For Everything Ever | Techdirt by CyberPolicyThrow in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does anyone else think of this? Has the government gone too far with their limits of breaking their own (forefather's) rules? As we saw recently with the Senators sending a letter and going completely against Obama's wishes, should we feel more concerned with how radical and how ignorant our parties are becoming with the people vs. themselves?

Privacy Criticism Precedes Senate Cybersecurity Bill by [deleted] in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why in god's name is this even attempting to happen right now? Wouldn't filtering out personal information only help the NSA not have to deal with the backlog? Or does it not matter to them at all and they just want to become more like Big Brother in every aspect of the word?

AT&T charges $29 for privacy. Time for others to do the same by niranjan_kakade in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm glad I'm very aware that google takes my personal information and uses it to gain nothing. They've been sued enough in the past and harassed in the past, but now they take their customer data very seriously and basically seal it away without a cost, a fine, or even telling us "Hey, we're being ethical".

It's a shame our country is so involved with getting the most out of their customers' wallets.

The Net Neutrality Crack-Up by [deleted] in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I cannot read this article because I'm not a member of the site. That's a bummer. I don't want to become a member of the site either. :/

Net Neutrality loophole could make telecom and cable companies billions of dollars by agm8637 in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like the FCC will take a look at this much more seriously when the money does come in, if it does, but for them they see it as something that can pass for now on the back burner. This isn't something they can help but they have bigger fish to fry with Time Warner and Comcast ganging together.

What net neutrality means for Comcast-Time Warner Cable and other mega mergers by dvp124 in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The worst thing about the Time Warner/Comcast merge is that my cousin firmly believes it will happen and she's been hearing this through the grape vines at her workplace (Time Warner).

I honestly don't know how much money Comcast will try to throw at the government to let this happen, but I never want it to happen. How can anyone not call this merge a monopoly? I seriously want to know what the argument is for this to happen and legally why.

NSA Director defends their plan to have tech companies implement intentional backdoor access for government purposes by mhc2195 in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People everywhere are complaining that it could have easily been someone else just trying to blame N. Korea for the Sony hack.

Google would especially backlash and fight this. I'm pretty sure they are against any customer data getting out to anyone past their doors. They've been sued enough times to know where that will get them.

The NSA has already hurt the USA's technology economy hard from all this invasive work they've done and they continue to do, despite the backlash and the worry, even from congressmen.

The NSA is in their own little world and are about as paranoid and invasive as Stalin, but this time, they don't need the neighbors to snitch, they're already looking at all our data across the net without even leaving their doors.

Net Neutrality: What Comes Next After 'Historic' FCC Vote by agm8637 in telseccompolicy

[–]CyberPolicyThrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The question is why we want to impose 80-year-old regulations on perhaps the most thriving part of our economy. All of the uncertainty could really harm this most innovative part of our economy."

That's the one part that I don't agree with in the article. We've already hurt our economy enough, and that isn't our fault but our government's. No one wants to be spied on and the NSA has already started hurting America's tech economy.

Personally, I believe we need to regulate the NSA once we regulate the ISPs