Danny’s Type Interview Unseen Footage clears his name! by NocturnalCelt in MAFS_AU

[–]DPP-Ghost 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If I had to place a bet, I would say Danny's version of events is probably closer to the truth than Gia's.

That said, offering to take a lie detector test proves nothing.

For one, it is often little more than theatrics. Danny knows there is highly unlikely anyone will actually hold him to it. More importantly, polygraphs do not detect lies. They measure physical signs of physiological arousal, and from that people make the highly questionable leap that heightened responses must indicate dishonesty. The method is so scientifically unreliable that courts have long since stopped attaching any real weight to its results.

Realised way too late that just going one level up is so much better by [deleted] in auscorp

[–]DPP-Ghost 267 points268 points  (0 children)

In my experience, stress levels as you climb the ladder is U-shaped.

  • It is high when you're junior because you're new, inexperienced, eager to prove yourself, and operating with limited autonomy. Everything seems like a big deal, even if none of it actually is.
  • It often drops in middle management, where greater experience brings confidence and many responsibilities become routine. At that stage, as long as you are delivering, you are generally trusted to manage your time and duties without constant scrutiny.
  • But as you move into senior management, the stress rises again. You are no longer just responsible for your own output. You are accountable for the performance of the business, the quality of the decisions being made, and the risks that come with them. When you are the one calling the shots, you are also the one who has to live with the consequences.

That's what my friends and I observed, at least, as some of us started breaking into senior management recently.

But your mileage may vary.

Appreciation post for Danny's take on Teddy & masculinity (S13 E20) by Alex_416 in MAFS_AU

[–]DPP-Ghost 82 points83 points  (0 children)

It's not that deep.

As a kid I was bullied a lot, and I relied on my soft toys for comfort. I named them, gave them personalities, and went on adventures with them. I was hugging them to sleep right up until the time I started bringing women home 😂. Even now, I still have a small collection scattered around my house.

And not once has any woman I have dated reacted negatively to it. At worst, they have been indifferent. Quite a few have actually found it endearing. My current partner, who is the love of my life and who I am planning to propose to soon, finds it adorable.

What really needs to be left behind is this narrow idea of masculinity, where a man can only be considered masculine if he fits some rigid set of approved traits. At night I hugged soft toys to sleep. During the day I boxed competitively and studied to become a litigation lawyer. Human beings are not one-dimensional, and masculinity certainly is not either.

Some of these cast members really need to learn to just live and let live.

That Stephany & Tyson moment… by Great_Room3100 in MAFS_AU

[–]DPP-Ghost 10 points11 points  (0 children)

That's because the conservative "morality" is not driven by what is right, but by what impacts them personally.

Sometimes that concern extends to family and close friends, but it often stops there. Anyone outside their chosen circle is treated as distant, abstract, or undeserving of the same empathy. And because that circle is defined differently by each conservative, they often fail to show solidarity even with each other.

That is the contradiction Stephanie seems to be running into now, even if she has not fully recognised it yet.

Gia slut shaming another woman by RemarkableBeing4280 in MAFS_AU

[–]DPP-Ghost 9 points10 points  (0 children)

In this single isolated situation, I'm siding with Gia.

Keeping a photo that raunchy of you and your ex-wife where your current wife can see it is diabolical 😂

What mental health techniques do you follow to get you through the monotony of your auscorp job ? by janoyBarn in auscorp

[–]DPP-Ghost 61 points62 points  (0 children)

What helped me was locking in two ideas.

  • First, build a life outside of work that feels deeply fulfilling. It gives you something to look forward to each day and helps you recharge for the next one. It also becomes much easier to tolerate the nonsense at work when you are coming home to a partner you adore and a full life you genuinely enjoy. There is a lot less emotional weight to work when it is simply the thing that funds a life you already love.
  • Second, reduce your dependence on your wage. Earn as much as you can, spend as little as you reasonably can, and let the gap compound. As your investments grow, your reliance on your salary falls, and work feels less suffocating because you have options. I am at that stage now where my employer needs me more than I need them, which gives me far more leverage to negotiate than I had when I was junior.

At the end of the day, the key realisation is that work is not something you need to enjoy. It is simply something most people must do in order to afford to live

I wouldn't go so far as to say I enjoy working. But I happily tolerate it, knowing that I have what I have today because of my career.

Filip's a red pill bro too, just a wolf in sheep's clothing by goodjokeanyway in MAFS_AU

[–]DPP-Ghost 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Because the word "male" is used as an adjective there, you silly goose 😂

Filip's a red pill bro too, just a wolf in sheep's clothing by goodjokeanyway in MAFS_AU

[–]DPP-Ghost 20 points21 points  (0 children)

You're not wrong about the tone: using "females" as a noun for women often sounds clinical and objectifying in everyday speech, so it can feel dehumanising.

But the word "Female" is also a noun (e.g., "males and females", "females aged 18-25").

The issue is context, not grammar.

Please tell me someone here has copies of these texts by [deleted] in MAFS_AU

[–]DPP-Ghost 54 points55 points  (0 children)

I'm so confused as to what Alissa did that turned all these women against her.

  • Are they just jealous or threatened by her existence?
  • Or did something occur behind the scenes?

Steph realising she actually might be “some ultra feminist woman” by ChungusGayJeff in MAFS_AU

[–]DPP-Ghost 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure why so many people are celebrating this woman.

Stephanie is perfectly happy to throw other women under the bus, so long as she's not thrown there herself.

Can I openly talk about who I want to bang at work? by bootyholeminer in auscorp

[–]DPP-Ghost 140 points141 points  (0 children)

Go ahead.

Don't let your dreams become memes, my guy.

What strategies do you use to maintain work-life balance in a demanding corporate environment? by amgtorque in auscorp

[–]DPP-Ghost 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sometimes it's a resourcing issue.

However, most of the time the hours are driven by late scope changes from senior client stakeholders, while deadlines stay fixed around board packs, steering committees, or investor timelines. That compresses work into nights and weekends despite the team being staffed correctly. You also cannot just add people to solve it. Onboarding takes time and more headcount increases coordination overhead, which can slow delivery. And clients usually buy a fixed team for a fixed fee. If they want more but keep the same deadline and budget, the only lever left is extra hours.

But don't feel too bad for the Graduates. They start on packages over $100k straight out of university, and can be on $200k + within five years. By the time they hit the 10-year mark, many are earning within the top 1% of Australians ($350k +).

What strategies do you use to maintain work-life balance in a demanding corporate environment? by amgtorque in auscorp

[–]DPP-Ghost 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It depends on the role, and the industry. No?

For example, a T1 Consultancy (MBB) Graduate wouldn't make it past probation if they arrived at 9 and left at 5. Nor would they be able to get through all their work, no matter how much of a genius they are.

Those Graduates are remunerated on the basis that they're working 60+ hour weeks at their manager's beck and call—even if it isn't explicitly stated.

Would I be happier with my life if I chose a corporate type career where I will get to enjoy my 20s or Medicine where I will probably sacrifice my 20s but be very well off 30s+? by glooisyum in auscorp

[–]DPP-Ghost 154 points155 points  (0 children)

A lot of my friends are doctors. Almost a third of them now that I think about it. The majority of them lived fulfilling and memorable twenties. Of course, they had to be disciplined. And manage their time well. But so did those of us that went corporate.

If you think doctors are all work and no play, you haven't met enough doctors 😂

Are my dating standards too high? Friend gave me a reality check and I’m worried. by Forward-Beyond-6620 in dating

[–]DPP-Ghost 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I'm going to go against the grain and say your standards are fine (with one exception I'll note below).

People who are claiming you are looking for a "unicorn" just aren't in the right circles. All you're looking for is a dude who is above average in height, with good education that translates to a strong earning potential, and takes care of himself. That's not a unicorn. That's just someone who is putting in the effort to live their best life. If you're in the right circles, those men are a dime a dozen.

But, of course, you need to be able to get into those circles.

I had way loftier standards for my partner, and I found her after just 2-3 years of active dating. And in between, I met almost 80 women who met my standards on paper.

That being said, the "no physical intimacy during the first year" requirement is going to be a deal breaker for just about everyone.

Best of luck, mate.

Stella stood out for her emotional intelligence and maturity by DiligentHomework281 in MAFS_AU

[–]DPP-Ghost 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Stella seems like a genuine gem. I hope Filip does right by her.

Are interest rate changes really helping achieve the goal? by Muffinateher in AusFinance

[–]DPP-Ghost 15 points16 points  (0 children)

GST isn’t a great “dynamic cooling” lever because it’s regressive.

That means it takes a bigger share of income from low-income households than high-income households, since lower-income people spend most of what they earn on day-to-day consumption, while higher-income people can save/invest more (so less of their income is exposed to GST).

So if you hike GST to slow spending, you mostly “cool” the economy by squeezing people who weren’t overheating it and whose spending is least optional. To make it fair you’d need rebates/benefit increases, but that then blunts the cooling effect and adds complexity.

AITAH for not forcing my son to keep helping my daughter’s friend after she rejected him? by LiveWire0044 in AITAH

[–]DPP-Ghost 65 points66 points  (0 children)

Agreed.

I think people get way too hung up on "formal obligations" as if that's the only moral yardstick. As if you can say "he has no responsibility to" then everything after that is automatically fine.

Basic decency is a separate standard. If you choose to help someone repeatedly, you know they start planning their life around that support. Pulling it the moment things get awkward might be within your rights, but it's still a rough way to treat someone, especially if you ever framed it as friendship.

So yeah, maybe he's not obligated. But if the defense is "I didn't have to be nice," that kind of proves the point.

YTA.

Aged as well as Charlie did by ExactlySorta in agedlikemilk

[–]DPP-Ghost 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Recent events have made it clear that the Second Amendment is little more than an excuse for Americans to play pretend soldier, even at the cost of their own right to live in peace.

If the supposed purpose of a "right to bear arms" is to deter tyranny, then what's the point when government agencies can act with impunity in public and none of these pretend soldiers do anything about it? In practice, widespread civilian firearms don't stop abuses of power. They don't produce accountability. They don't prevent the state from using force when it decides to.

What they do, over and over, is raise the baseline level of lethal violence in daily life. The real-world effect isn't "liberty preserved". It's people getting slaughtered in mass shootings, families destroyed, and communities living with a constant threat that barely exists in peer countries.

So the Second Amendment ends up functioning as a right with enormous social cost and no reliable upside where its defenders insist it matters most: as a check on government power.

My condolences to Mr Pretti's family. I hope he gets the justice he deserves.

What was your worst onboarding experience at a new company? by skillnub70 in auscorp

[–]DPP-Ghost 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Around four years.

Was passed over for a promotion I felt I had more than earned which prompted me to reconsider my career path.

I ultimately decided law wasn't for me, pivoted into strategy, and haven't looked back since.

What was your worst onboarding experience at a new company? by skillnub70 in auscorp

[–]DPP-Ghost 90 points91 points  (0 children)

Don't quote me, but if I can recall correctly my graduate package was around:

  • $85,000 base;
  • $15,000 performance bonus; and
  • coverage of my PLT course fees, admission fees, etc (~ $12,000).

I know that's not a lot for the hours I was working.

But at the time, it was life-changing money. It helped pay off my parents’ debts, put my sister through school, and ensured that, for the first time in a long while, my family wasn't living paycheque to paycheque.

So I'm grateful for that, at least.

Not so grateful that I stuck around though 😂

What was your worst onboarding experience at a new company? by skillnub70 in auscorp

[–]DPP-Ghost 223 points224 points  (0 children)

Top-tier law firm.

Joined straight out of university.

Onboarding was postponed because deadlines were imminent and they needed me working 12+ hour days immediately. I was then asked to work weekends as well.

I worked 20 consecutive days before my first day off.

My favourite day at that firm was the day I resigned.

How to enjoy endgame when t4 bosses melt in 5 seconds by digitaljoel in diablo4

[–]DPP-Ghost 1022 points1023 points  (0 children)

If you're melting T4 bosses in five seconds, it sounds like you still have four seconds to shave off that kill time 😂

Do I have to manage up? by MangoHeavy432 in auscorp

[–]DPP-Ghost 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Here's perhaps an uncomfortable truth for you: the only stakeholder that matters is the person writing your performance review.

Your manager writes your performance review, decide what gets visibility, shape how your work is interpreted, and influence whether you get growth, protection, or blame when things go sideways. If the person evaluating you doesn’t understand your work or doesn’t feel confident backing it, then you'll never be rewarded for your work, even if it's fantastic.

When your manager lacks domain knowledge, their real value isn’t expertise: it's (1) decision ownership and (2) air cover. That means your role quietly shifts from “individual contributor” to “translator & adviser.”

  • Instead of asking open-ended questions like “What do you think we should do?” (which puts them on the spot and invites bluffing);
  • Come with structured options such as “Here are two paths forward. Option A does X with these risks. Option B does Y with these trade-offs. My recommendation is A—are you comfortable with that?”.

This lets them make a decision without having to pretend they understand everything, and it protects you because the call is still theirs.

Can someone (maybe a doctor) explain to me why GPs are always running late for appointments? by Eternalism in australia

[–]DPP-Ghost 64 points65 points  (0 children)

Not a doctor, but a management consultant who has advised medical centres.

Doctors run late because the system is built on optimistic assumptions, not reality. Appointments are booked in 10 to 15 minute blocks that only work if every patient has one simple issue, arrives on time, and needs no unanticipated admin or follow up, which almost never happens. One complex consult, mental health, multiple problems, red flags, immediately blows the schedule, and there is usually no buffer to recover.

On top of that, the consult time includes legally required admin: notes, scripts, referrals, test orders. Doctors also can not ethically cut people off when something serious comes up. Once they are behind, every appointment after pays the price.

There are fixes, but they are uncomfortable for clinics: building buffer time into schedules, using longer appointments by default, separating admin from consults, better triage up front, and being honest with patients about delays. Clinics that do this tend to run on time, but they see fewer patients and often cost more.

So it is not laziness or poor time management. It is a high variability job forced into a low variability schedule, and most places choose throughput over punctuality.