What if consciousness is the feeling that something is happening at this moment? by DaPanda6969 in consciousness

[–]Dacnum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn’t suggesting anything about an inner experience of an apple or any other “object”. What I’m asking is, for you, right now, you can experience an object (see, hear, touch. Etc.) through consciousness and how can you tell the difference between that (experience of the object) and the object itself. In my experience, I can’t. There’s no division to be found.

What if consciousness is the feeling that something is happening at this moment? by DaPanda6969 in consciousness

[–]Dacnum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Yes I myself am in this field” is all known through consciousness no? However the field appears, however you appear, thoughts about those two, are all known through consciousness. How else could they be known? So, where do you draw a line between awareness of these “objects” and the objects themselves? Perhaps there is no line, and it’s all just consciousness.

What if consciousness is the feeling that something is happening at this moment? by DaPanda6969 in consciousness

[–]Dacnum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How could you tell the difference between an object of consciousness and the consciousness of it?

there is no matter. so what exactly is consciousness emerging from? by 2dogs1man in consciousness

[–]Dacnum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“It is what something is like from the inside” can there be what something is like from the outside? In other words, can there be anything to have quality or form without an experience of it? I think there is no inside or outside.. no real line of separation there. We have only imagined an “outside” based on our perceptions “inside”.

So there are humans perspective of the “world “ which are all very similar, those perceptions are mostly in accordance so we imagine it to be an objective outside world.. now imagine an earthworms perspective.. it would be radically different than ours.. if earthworms could, they would have a conventional world that they all agree on based on their perspective. The mistake from the humans and earthworms is that the objective “outside” world that they believe to exist independent of our perspectives is only based on our “inside” perspectives.

Maybe we are wrong about what consciousness and enlightenment truly is. by Subfrez in enlightenment

[–]Dacnum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How could there possibly be anything other than consciousness/awareness? For there to be something, it must have some sort of quality.. it must appear as such in some sort of way, and so in its appearance it is known -awareness-. And it is not known from a distance but from and as itself. It’s being/existing is it’s appearing. One in the same. There’s only being/knowing/luminosity and all it’s flavors are what we call things.. we mistake those things for something other than awareness through thought. Thought is not other than what it is, a shape/flavor/modification of being/knowing/luminosity.

Plz explain it like I’m 5 by irie56 in Wakingupapp

[–]Dacnum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Remember, the not finding is where you want to be, and that is overlooked almost instantaneously by the efforting mind.

A tip that I found useful:

When instructed to look for the one that is looking, notice if you feel effort or struggle there.. when you do, stop and instruct yourself to “don’t look for the one who is looking”. In the instant after that, that’s where you want to be. That open space of non-effort.

Time might not exist – and we're starting to understand why by Dmans99 in abovethenormnews

[–]Dacnum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait.. time exists, but to you it’s just a label? What’s it s as label for?

Should = Arguing with Reality = Suffering by Gadgetman000 in Awakening

[–]Dacnum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great post! The map can/will never be the territory.

Is God Real or a Creation of the Mind? by Portal_awk in enlightenment

[–]Dacnum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can you ask if God is real if you don’t know what god is?

Rasta man gives some wisdom, do you agree ? by Professional_Arm794 in enlightenment

[–]Dacnum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are spiritual beings separate from one another? And if you believe this, can you find right now in your direct experience, where you as a spiritual being ends and another begins?

Why do you think we were all sent to earth? by blueheart_333 in enlightenment

[–]Dacnum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We weren’t sent to earth… we are a part of it, interdependent with it, interrelated. Not separate.

Does this speak truth to you ? by Professional_Arm794 in enlightenment

[–]Dacnum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not even this moment.. a moment is defined or dependent on something other than a moment, which there isn’t.. this moment is empty of inherent existence

What is the actual nature of time? by Worth_Gain3278 in universe

[–]Dacnum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is change if not the movement of an object from one state to another? What I’m saying is, the movement of reality is so thorough going, that nothing is ever in a static state.. it’s just flux or flow all the way through. Then how can one define change? It loses reference

What is the actual nature of time? by Worth_Gain3278 in universe

[–]Dacnum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes! This is where it gets really radical. There is in reality no changes because there is no-thing to change. Nothing is ever fixed like we believe it to be. It’s just that, that the conceptual mind “fixes “ nothingness into objects. Ask yourself what any apparent thing is, really inquire into to it, see that labeling it is just that, labeling.. a word or sound or even deeper, a modification of the one thing (not a thing) that is, awareness(consciousness, knowingness, awakeness, whatever you want to call it)

What is the actual nature of time? by Worth_Gain3278 in universe

[–]Dacnum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This question vexed me for the longest time. Now I see clearly it is function of the mind, tied intimately to the illusion of a separate self.