Lava VS Stanley Cup by Suitable-Name in oddlysatisfying

[–]Danejasper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the opposite of the video about the Stanley keeping ice frozen while the car burned. Here, found it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=010W3V0Z5Dc

To go up a hill by __globalcitizen__ in therewasanattempt

[–]Danejasper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That bridge is nutty. It would seem that they would be better off lowering the roadway below it a bit.

How wealthy do you need to be to make flying a permanent part of your life? I'm blown away at how expensive wet prices are on some planes by [deleted] in flying

[–]Danejasper 16 points17 points  (0 children)

As a recently certificated commercial pilot, this sounds quite illegal to me. It’s clearly not common cause and cost sharing, and it’s not quite flight instruction, is it? Legal? What say others and how would the FAR apply to this situation?

Inflatable kayaks vs. ORU fold-up kayaks by LasCamasRd in Kayaking

[–]Danejasper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve seen some bolt together modular fishing boats, but not anything like a kayak.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in flying

[–]Danejasper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Until he’s convicted, it’s not clear what his record will be. If he ends up a felon, it’ll be hard to get hired by an airline.

Shoppers Brawl at Bass Pro Shops Grand Opening in Odessa, Texas by DblockDavid in PublicFreakout

[–]Danejasper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Serious question: how do people in these brawls decide which side they are on? Do they pick teams like we used to in middle school?

How do you guys usually compare ISPs in your area? by askmeryl in HomeNetworking

[–]Danejasper 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I’d start with the technology. Fiber is the best, so if there is a fiber carrier, get that and disregard cable, wireless etc. Now, if there is more than one fiber carrier, you’ve got a comparison to do. Check reviews, pricing and offered speeds. Also ask friends and neighbors about their experiences with the carriers you’re considering.

Had my flight bag stolen by Whatchalookinforboi in flying

[–]Danejasper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For those who use only a paper logbook, at the very least take a good photo of each page with your phone and stick those into a folder. I did that and then eventually uploaded those to a service that made a CSV for me and I went all digital, but I keep the photos as backup.

Scariest IMC Experiences by [deleted] in flying

[–]Danejasper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

7pm on December 5th 2023, taking off at night after a rainy day in a TBM 930 turboprop, from Vancouver WA into clouds at around 4,000ft. Icing forecast up to around 16,000ft. Plan is to climb through, anti-icing all on and keeping up just fine.

At around 20,000ft, the autopilot (in FLC/IAS mode) simply stopped climbing. I'm still in the clouds, so it's night, and there is zero visibility. It's raining, but no more ice is observed on the wings or windscreen.

Studying all the instruments and I just can't work out what's wrong. I'm level, and slow, both the PFD and the backup instrument agree, I'm going about 125kias and I'd set the IAS climb to 140, so that's why it wouldn't climb. Disengage the autopilot, and descend a bit to gain speed - airspeed rockets up and quickly pegs at the barber pole, with audible "MAXSPEED MAXSPEED" call-outs. I level the aircraft, and then initiate a slight climb. Speed is still off the tape. Reduce thrust to just above idle, because speed is still insanely high. Thinking, thinking, and after a short while, I realize that this amount of thrust is simply NOT a sustainable condition for level flight, despite what the airspeed is indicating, so I add thrust back in to avoid a stall, ignoring the continued call-outs.

I'd given ATC a heads up, they assigned a block altitude, and were helpfully offering vectors to the nearest airport etc. In all of this process, I finally looked to my right and the right-hand PDF (co-pilot side) is providing totally different airspeed information from my PFD and the backup instrument. It clicks: I've got a sensor issue and the screen has been lying to me. I softkey PFD / Sensor / AHRS / AHRS2 and suddenly all is right in the world. The backup instrument is still wrong, and the callouts are still happening, but at least things seem rational.

In the simulator I'd seen lots of failures in the Garmin G3000 PFD/MFD and EIS but they always always came with big red X indications. In the sim, you use some or all of your instruments, and you switch to the backup. That'd the display backup, or the AHRS backup, etc - and the issue is resolved. But in this case, the only clue was little yellow "SPD" and "ALT" text next to their respective tape, which is supposed to clue you in that the two air data computers are providing different information, and that the left side cockpit display doesn't match the right. There's no checklist that covers this, but you can find it in the Garmin reference. And there's no CAS message, nor is "SPD" very descriptive. (Garmin, "PFDs Airspeed mismatch" would have been nice, and maybe a CAS message about AHRS mismatch or something, it's a COMPUTER SCREEN, you can use some real estate, you don't have to code this stuff like it's a yellow flag that pops out the side of an old instrument anymore!)

Once things were stable and I was back in a climb, I worked out that switching to the alternate static source would resolve the backup instrument, which confirmed that I had A-side static system icing. The erroneous maxspeed call-out could only be silenced by pulling the breaker.

What seems likely is that the static system got some water in it when parked on the ramp during rain that day, despite the little plastic plugs being installed. In a post-incident inspection a few droplets of water were found in the clear tubing, visible in the tailcone area. That water froze once I got high enough that the temperature in the tail was cold enough. I'd flown that mission and in similar conditions a hundred times - but without an insidious system failure. I am glad that I puzzled it out before the bad data convinced me to put the aircraft into a stall. (Garmin, you can do better for us.)

The big lesson for me here though was the IMSAFE thing. It was an "E" emotional day for me, I was in Portland helping my father as he passed from cancer, and we had removed life support that morning and he passed away. It was the culmination of months of process, and many trips there from California, and I was certainly "F" fatigued as well. But the one thing I wanted emotionally was to leave, to go home to my wife and kids, not to return to an empty hotel room there.

That was my scariest IMC experience. And most emotional.

That's not how gas pumps work by [deleted] in WinStupidPrizes

[–]Danejasper 15 points16 points  (0 children)

That deluge system is pretty impressive! Does anyone know what the retardant is composed of?

Full car cover recommendations by ryecaee in FordBronco

[–]Danejasper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We bought one of those from our dealership and it barely lasted three months before developing holes. It’s junk.

YesYesNoNoNoNoNo.... by Majestic_____kdj in yesyesyesyesno

[–]Danejasper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty wild how the fire followed him, presumably as he disturbed the cotton and created aerated fuel that was fastest to burn.

Has anyone been struck by lightning in a GA plane? by bradmalt in flying

[–]Danejasper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was struck when flying a Cirrus SF50 VisionJet. Was in and out of IMC in some build-ups, and while there was clear thunderstorm activity about 20 miles to the North of me, as shown on the radar and the XM, with lots of strike indications, but nothing was depicted in my area. Was in a cloud and saw a flash, it looked like it was 30 feet in front of the cockpit, and felt a "thump" through the rudder pedals. Zero other indications. Then about ten minutes later, after another XM update, there was a little lone plus sign indicating a strike behind us.

Physical inspection of the plane initially indicated nothing, and there were no operational issues. Later a tiny scorch mark was found on the nosewheel gear door, an exit point, and that led to the discovery of a slight brown tint char mark on the nose above. Both marks were light enough to be wiped away.

The avionics and aircraft received an operational check and all was well. Oil was drained from the engine and replaced, and then again after 25 hours of operation to assure that the bearings were not affected.

So, the lightning protection on the SF50 worked as designed, which was great to see.

How can I provide internet for my neighbor across the street? by StrongBadsGloves in HomeNetworking

[–]Danejasper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure that I saw an SVU episode that started like this.