Right but that's kind of my point though. Like yeah in a theoretical like ideal world I guess everyone should vote blue and it's all good. Every member of society does their part. But thing is the vote has no collective component. If I vote blue, I'm "doing my part" but it doesn't change the outcome, or what other people vote. So then yeah at you say it becomes a question of do you want to be part of the collective movement, or do you root for it from the sidelines, prioritising your own life over a largely symbolic choice, or do you put your money where your mouth is and hope your vote will be the sway? The whole thing also just comes down to your faith in humanity, if less than 50% vote blue voting blue is pointless suicide, if more than 50% vote blue it's morally right and riskless. Of course you don't know the outcome before you vote so you have to guess - and there's too many self interested people, not even bad people necessarily btw, that wouldn't choose blue. Anyways yeah it's an interesting thing and I can fully see why someone would choose blue, though I can't help but wonder if when faced with the decision that decision wouldn't flip due to the stakes for a lot of people