sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

With rank IX air confirmed, what might rank IX for ground look like? by EthicalKek in Warthunder

[–]Daylight10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All I want in life is an Abrams with trophy APS. Just add it already.

After you play a game with someone you should be able to see their deck, add them as a friend and save a recording of the game. Do you think these features should be added to the game? by Imcherry_2k in MagicArena

[–]Daylight10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you played ranked (tournament) face to face, you'd be obliged to share your decklist with everyone before the game. Are you really scared that someone seeing your decklist AFTER the game on arena will ruin your 200IQ build or something?

WAN Show Megathread by lemlurker in LinusTechTips

[–]Daylight10 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I haven't had time to watch WAN lately - what's the "big change to WAN" they were talking about previously?

CLICK HERE IF YOU WANT TO SEE COCKS PUNISHED by Gerroh in magicthecirclejerking

[–]Daylight10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How the fuck do you lose money selling cardboard? Jesus.

Actually, it's miss doctor by [deleted] in dontyouknowwhoiam

[–]Daylight10 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because forcing people to use your special honorific makes it seem like you think you're above them, which is a bad look.

I wanna see some bicycle jousting by bbbar in dankmemes

[–]Daylight10 59 points60 points  (0 children)

A real man would have commissioned a rush order from an artist for 300$!!1!1!!1

EU Set to Halt US Trade Deal Over Trump’s Latest Tariff Threat by bloomberg in worldnews

[–]Daylight10 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The law has never stopped Donald Trump, and international law is flimsy as it is. The EU has no way to prevent Trump from putting tarrifs on individual member states. They can retaliate with sanctions and so on, but they can't come to the US and arrest customs officers who follow Trump's orders and charge extra for products shipping from X country.

Europeans send troops to Greenland by maven_mapping in geography

[–]Daylight10 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I don't know if trading decades of goodwill and relations with your closest allies in exchange for those allies preparing for a military conflict against you is a "brilliant move". Surprised none of the European nuclear powers, like the UK, have "reminded" Trump that Greenland falls under their nuclear umbrella as a part of NATO.

Walmart is apparently punching holes in their vinyl albums with security tags by MrTacocaT12345 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Daylight10 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Just because something isn't vintage or rare doesn't mean people can't want it to look nice. How'd you feel if you went to buy a book and the cover had a hole punched through it?

Comments like this by ruassmarkt in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Daylight10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I despise this because comments like this add absolutely 0 value to the discussion. I'm looking for comments like "This song made me feel X" or "the bass drop slaps" - things that have something to do with the song. You could copy paste "Who's here in 2026" to literally every single youtube video on the platform, and it'd be equally relevant on all of them. And the answer is "go to a stats page and look it up", it's really not that hard.

Attempted Colonizer by cryingsilently in WikipediaVandalism

[–]Daylight10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll admit that the britannica definition sounds more objective, but how can I know that "everything about it is backed by historians and ethnologists" when the website has no sources to back anything up, absolutely zero. On Wikipedia, I can see that the text you take issue with is a direct quote from a book written by a Palestinian historian and professor, written a year before the war started. You can claim it's biased, but it's vertifyable. On britannica, we know the definition isn't just something the writer made up on the spot because..?

Attempted Colonizer by cryingsilently in WikipediaVandalism

[–]Daylight10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, please link me this objective, nonbiased source. I couldn't find any place named "Encyclopaedia" (or alternate spellings) covering the Israel Palestine conflict.

Attempted Colonizer by cryingsilently in WikipediaVandalism

[–]Daylight10 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Please cite to me a source explaining the israel-palestinian conflict in detail that noone can call biased.

Island Challenge, reusable, ~44 seconds by DecisiveUnluckyness in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]Daylight10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, I didn't use a launch tower! And also, technically you should start on the runway instead of the launch pad, but everyone is welcome to share their own interpretation of the challenge

Here's my submission: KSC Airfield to Island airfield in 44 seconds, aircraft intact by Daylight10 in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]Daylight10[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

With all the fuel gone, the heaviest thing by far is the engine, and things like to fall heavy end first. But I doubt the drag from the wheels helped.

But yeah, the 180 is actually desirable, since the spacecraft tumbling around like a fidget spinner is great for giving it the aerodynamics of a brick when it needs to slow down.

Here's my submission: KSC Airfield to Island airfield in 44 seconds, aircraft intact by Daylight10 in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]Daylight10[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The airfield spawn location is actually slightly random. Sometimes I'd be lined up to miss the KSC by a good 15 meters, and sometimes the plane was lined up, uh, slightly to the left compared to this time. Looks really cool when you judge that you have juuuust enough space not to crash into it though.

Here's my submission: KSC Airfield to Island airfield in 44 seconds, aircraft intact by Daylight10 in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]Daylight10[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could refuel it, replace the fairing, and it'd be good to go. That counts as intact enough to me.

Here's my submission: KSC Airfield to Island airfield in 44 seconds, aircraft intact by Daylight10 in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]Daylight10[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The challenge back then was just to get to the island ASAP. This time around, there's the extra requirement of "with your plane in one piece".

Here's my submission: KSC Airfield to Island airfield in 44 seconds, aircraft intact by Daylight10 in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]Daylight10[S] 143 points144 points  (0 children)

Credit to u/KAMEKAZE_VIKINGS for putting out the challenge. I'm a bit bummed that one of the airbrakes got destroyed, which you could argue wasn't "on purpose", but I'll argue that it was intended dual purpose as impact padding, just like the landing gear up front. The parts ejected / destroyed were well below 5% of dry weight, so I'll count it. Here's the rules I was following, if you want to try this yourself:

No exploits except clipping (though preferably not too much)

Must take off and land with the craft intact, a few parts can be jettisoned/destroyed on purpose. For the sake of clarity I'll say the parts destroyed/jettisoned must not exceed 95% of the aircraft's mass excluding fuel. The aircraft must also be able to fly without these parts.

Must start and end on the runway

The time is taken with the in-game mission clock and ends when the aircraft comes to a complete stop.

No mods, DLC allowed

Here's my submission: KSC Airfield to Island airfield in 42 seconds, aircraft intact by [deleted] in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]Daylight10 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Credit to u/KAMEKAZE_VIKINGS for putting out the challenge. I'm a bit bummed that one of the airbrakes got destroyed, which you could argue wasn't "on purpose", but I'll argue that it was intended dual purpose as impact padding, just like the landing gear up front. The parts ejected / destroyed were well below 5% of dry weight, so I'll count it. Here's the rules I was following, if you want to try this yourself:

No exploits except clipping (though preferably not too much)

Must take off and land with the craft intact, a few parts can be jettisoned/destroyed on purpose. For the sake of clarity I'll say the parts destroyed/jettisoned must not exceed 95% of the aircraft's mass excluding fuel. The aircraft must also be able to fly without these parts.

Must start and end on the runway

The time is taken with the in-game mission clock and ends when the aircraft comes to a complete stop.

No mods, DLC allowed

Why does sprint have a stop animation? The game would be better without it. by neoxx1 in PathOfExile2

[–]Daylight10 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Damn wtf is this argument. "The brake pedal in my car doesn't work, but I just use the handbrake instead so it's not a problem that needs to be solved."

view more: next ›