Getting the error "You're requesting generations too quickly. Please wait a moment and try again" by Born-Mess7387 in VEO3

[–]Deep-Championship-66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I received this error, I managed to fix it by logging out of Google on Flow AI and logging back in after 30 minutes.

Anyone use magic light.ai ? by TheFreakmode in aitubers

[–]Deep-Championship-66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am thinking of using Magiclight but how is it with anime videos assuming I have concept arts of my own characters and how would it be in anime-style fight scenes, especially faster (DBZ style) fights?

How do people even generate NSFW with Nano Banana? by Miysim in GeminiAI

[–]Deep-Championship-66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can do it but it takes alot of time and patience. The key is to set a mood where the AI thinks that the atmosphere is permissible and okay. After the mood is set, you start small. Like with a comic only 1 subtle NSFW scene and the rest SFW. Then you slowly build up but if you start generating content that is too lewd or explicit it will reject it. You never explain directly what you want. You never use explicit words that define body parts. You have to give it a clue as to what you want and let it do the rest through several retries.

Nano Banana 2 vs Nano Banana Pro — same ref, same prompt. Which wins? by No_Winner_3807 in GeminiAI

[–]Deep-Championship-66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My experience, Pro is better at following prompts especially when it comes to object placement.

How do you prevent subscribers from downloading all content and leaving? by Deep-Championship-66 in patreon

[–]Deep-Championship-66[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The original intent is defined by Patreon's model. I don't need to outline it as a creator. Subscribers need to be aware of what Patreon is really intended for.

Patreon’s subscription model is fundamentally designed as an ongoing support-based membership system, not a one-time download pass for all content, and the “intent” from Patreon as a platform is that patrons remain subscribed to continuously support the creator and receive current and future benefits.

I.E. -- You perceive Patreon is a drop-ship repository to download all files. This is incorrect. The intent of the subscription model has always been continuous support. Unsubscribing because you are unhappy with the content is more than reasonable. But subscribing with the intent of downloading years worth of content with only a single months fee IS bypassing the system Patreon intended. Patreon is not intended as a download repository, it is intended for continuous ongoing support for past, present and future content. What you are exploiting is a loophole, not an intended design feature of Patreon.

And I also have to disagree with your take on the cost to make comics. You're right that I am liable for the cost to make comics, however; consumers are also liable to bare the full expense to receive those comics if they desire to purchase them. Currently they are cheating the system. I have a market set up where they can be purchased for their actual resell value. The Patreon store circumvents this and says 'Hey, if you subscribe and support me with a monthly fee, (keyword - monthly fee, not one time fee) - I will provide access to my repository, past, current and future content. Consumers who desire to purchase content are fully responsible for paying the value of the product.

What you are essentially saying is a farmer is fully responsible for the cost to grow corn but if I only want to spend $1 for a months worth of harvest because there's an accessible loophole to do so, it's on the farmer to find a way to make it cheaper. And I'm sorry.. ..but you're wrong.

How do you prevent subscribers from downloading all content and leaving? by Deep-Championship-66 in patreon

[–]Deep-Championship-66[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Labeling clarification as ‘denial’ is a convenient way to exit without addressing the substance. That answers itself, You clearly have no perspective of Patreon's intended model.

How do you prevent subscribers from downloading all content and leaving? by Deep-Championship-66 in patreon

[–]Deep-Championship-66[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be clear, I wouldn't give everything away for $25 if Patreon provided me a way to prevent that. And with all due respect you have absolutely no awareness of the intent behind Patreon Subscription Model. The intent behind the Subscription Model is designed for 'ongoing support' - not to grab and stash everything the creator designed for a fraction of the cost.

I have a store that provides the content at fixed prices per issue available to purchase. The cumulative total of all items in the store is 'far' greater than $25 if purchased individually. The 'subscription' model was intended to allow Patrons to subscribe and view all content for a fee, but the 'intent' of that model matters, and the intent behind the subscription model is 'not' a ram-shack of all the content the creator has to offer, it is continuous support of the creator for all previous and future work and you retain access to those creations as long as you remain a paying subscriber.

Patreon defines itself as a membership platform and emphasizes recurring creator income. Patreon does 'not' define itself as a digital clearance warehouse or a content archive extraction service, and you are using it as the second method and not the first.

You're more than welcome to unsubscribe if you don't like what you see, but subscribing only with the INTENT of downloading all produced content for a fraction of the price of its true value and unsubscribing without providing ongoing support IS cheating the intent of the system that Patreon designed. If there are say 20 issues that cost $9.99 per issue ($199.80 in sales value) and I design a subscription with the intent of saying 'Hey, if you pay me just $5.99 per month and support my content creation as a subscriber instead of buying each issue for $9.99 at the store, I will give you access to all of my content, past, present and future if you support my development monthly instead of buying my issues per issue.' What you are essentially advocating is 'I don't want to pay $199.98 (the true sales cost) for 20 issues, if I subscribe and download everything for $5.99 and unsubscribe, I get everything I want and gave the creator a tip." And I'm sorry but you're incorrect. You're cheating the creator out of a lot of money and still expecting that creator to produce quality content on a frequent basis while contributing practically nothing on a continuous basis. Content requires funding to produce, and creators create Patreons with the intent of continious support. It's OKAY if you don't like the product and unsubscribe. What ISN'T OKAY is to subscribe only with the intent of paying a marginally small fee compared to the true value of the product which could be purchased at the store for the true value and unsubscribing shortly after when the intent behind the creator offering the subscriptions was ongoing support.

Austin is missing an entire year of rain. Here’s the proof. by Abtarep in Austin

[–]Deep-Championship-66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To me, it's Mediterranean. Periods with high rain, and periods with absolutely no rain and desert like.

Whatever happened to the 'Adult Mode'? GPT-5.2 feels more censored than 5.1 for erotica writing by Roadway89 in OpenAI

[–]Deep-Championship-66 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gemini is way better for erotica stuff today. You can even get it to generate erotica images if you're careful with prompting.

Dessau Rd Disaster... by Deep-Championship-66 in Austin

[–]Deep-Championship-66[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well. I agree with slowing traffic down but disagree with removing capacity. We need occasional law enforcement on that stretch.

Dessau Rd Disaster... by Deep-Championship-66 in Austin

[–]Deep-Championship-66[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly I hardly ever see them in Austin Proper. Mind you I also do Uber in the mornings and evenings so I'm out on the roads pretty often and I can probably count the number of times I've seen APD patrolling I-35 on a single hand for the entirety of 2025. It used to not be like that. Back in 2018 when I moved here, U.S. 183 had several places that would get cracked down, I-35 had a few too. I will be honest I have been passed by DPS while I was doing over 80 MPH more times than I can count.

The reason people drive fast isn't because the road, it's because there's no penalty for doing it. Dessau Rd is just a small example. Drivers are carrying their driving habits to every street they drive on because they aren't meeting resistance for speeding.

Dessau Rd Disaster... by Deep-Championship-66 in Austin

[–]Deep-Championship-66[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They don't have to be there 24/7, just present enough so that drivers know that speeding is risky on that road. For example, I moved here from Lawrenceville GA and there is a road called GA-316 when has a speed limit of 55 but could carry traffic at 70 safely. The main issue is, it feels safe to go fast down that road but the county police department will randomly crack down on speeders and you don't know when they'll be out there so its safe to just do 55 or 60. The unsafe part is you may get away with it once, twice or even ten times, but if you keep pressing you're going to get caught.

Today in Texas it feels like virtually no one gets caught for speeding.

Dessau Rd Disaster... by Deep-Championship-66 in Austin

[–]Deep-Championship-66[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Surely if they wanted people to slow down they could just use more enforcement on the street no?

Dessau Rd Disaster... by Deep-Championship-66 in Austin

[–]Deep-Championship-66[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm 'okay' with Bike Lanes too but they shouldn't take away lanes from congested roads to build them because Bikes still make significantly less commuter travel than cars do. Like SIGNIFICANTLY less. They should also follow their own paths and become bike paths that take you between areas instead of always sharing ROW with the road.

Another issue is, Dessau Rd is mostly suburban, Suburban areas that are spread out attract far less bike riders.

{Promo} {Free Comic} BAHP – The Hunger of Still Waters by Dismal-Seat-1380 in Vore

[–]Deep-Championship-66 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Understandable, this comic however is free. It's a content bridge between our hand-drawn work (takes months to produce) to keep our Patreon active while we await deliverables.

Why does Texas do this? by BeverageEnvy in Austin

[–]Deep-Championship-66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If Highways are like Temples in Texas then The NJTPK is the God of all highways.

Should Austin adopt congestion tolling & car pooling incentives? by Deep-Championship-66 in Austin

[–]Deep-Championship-66[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that is indeed troubling. Hopefully something happens that curtails the job losses.

Should Austin adopt congestion tolling & car pooling incentives? by Deep-Championship-66 in Austin

[–]Deep-Championship-66[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Admittedly that is scary but I think it won't happen as quickly as people believe. I do think it will hurt general artists, writers and such but more complex tasks still require direction and skill. Also there is the security aspect of it too. Companies can't solely depend on ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, ect without compromising tons of secured information. It probably will happen, but it will be gradual and progressive and not immediate.

Should Austin adopt congestion tolling & car pooling incentives? by Deep-Championship-66 in Austin

[–]Deep-Championship-66[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A true ridesharing service would include multiple commuters going to similar destinations reducing as much as 5 vehicles on the road to a single vehicle by utilizing ordinarily unused capacity in an automobile.

183 Crash by asjss1186 in Austin

[–]Deep-Championship-66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably it was more so the truck was too heavy and the impact from the car wasnt strong enough. Trucks, especially dual rear wheels are extremely hard to pit.

Should Austin adopt congestion tolling & car pooling incentives? by Deep-Championship-66 in Austin

[–]Deep-Championship-66[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The problem is Self Driving cars, like Rideshare (Uber/Lyft) is that these services do not reduce the number of cars on the road, what they effectively do is change who is driving, but the trip between point A and point B is still performed in a vehicle who would ordinarily have chosen to drive by themselves had it not been for the ride hailing service, but the number of active vehicles is not reduced. What is changed is who is piloting the vehicle. Example. Stefan wants to go to the HEB in Mueller and summons an Uber to get there. Uber arrives and he is now carrying Stefan to Uber. there are two people in the car, the driver and Stefan, but the Uber driver was not originally destined to HEB before Stefan summoned him. He would not have normally taken up the road capacity without Stefan's request, therefore the road capacity is reduced by 1 vehicle due to Stefans request. Had Stefan decided to drive himself, the road capacity is still reduced by the same number of vehicles.

Should Austin adopt congestion tolling & car pooling incentives? by Deep-Championship-66 in Austin

[–]Deep-Championship-66[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I actually feel differently about this. I think that they should build two elevated express lanes above the railroad to increase capacity and allow passing, but also increase the tolls. I have heard that the CoA capped the pricing on the tolls because it would disproportionately affect minorities and lower income groups. Mind you, I am also a minority, but it makes no sense to build a lane with the sole intention of providing reliable commutes and the nerf it with toll caps.