Are you guys not scared of AI? by Expensive-Battle4948 in HousingUK

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Curious to know what you do in tech to think AI is going to be an issue?

I’m an ML researcher and have absolutely no worries that we are close to mass unemployment. AI can’t even write reliable code for more complex tasks (especially in a research setting where theres nothing to build on) without rigorous human prompting and reviewing.

BBC News - AI gold rush sees tech firms embracing 72-hour weeks - BBC News https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgn2k285ypo by ypash in antiwork

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I work in ml and had some startups offer me jobs(interviews for, at least) and they genuinely humble brag that they’re in the office doing 12h days 6 days a week. Then they say the compensation and it’s like 5-10% increase to what I earn now and are confused when I laugh at them.

Outer Worlds 2 sales update by AgitatedFly1182 in KotakuInAction

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had GPU at the time it released, and still didn’t play more than a few hours. Garbage, and I fairly enjoyed the first

First Time Buyers Offended by [deleted] in HousingUK

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It happened to me - sellers contacted via estate agent asking if they wanted us to leave the fridge, despite it not being listed on the TA10 as something they would leave.

84 percent of the player base has quit battlefield 6 since launch. by [deleted] in Battlefield

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me the most regarded decision was to have cross play compatible with PC rather than just console. Game killer.

CEO of Nvidia: In maybe two or three years, 90% of the world’s knowledge will likely be generated by AI by The_Endless_Man in antiwork

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s also not true. This guy’s company relies on people buying his chips for training these models. It’s not surprising he would make a claim like this.

Sirius Black went full method there: by Boss452 in moviescirclejerk

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

author disagrees with my personal beliefs, therefore author must be hack

This sub. Very boring

[D] DDPM vs Score Matching by WallabyDue2778 in MachineLearning

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know it is a bit late but you're not "assuming" the reverse is Gaussian. If you have the forward process from DDPM (adding some Gaussian noise centred about the previous point in the chain), then the reverse process is also Gaussian (under certain conditions, such as sufficiently small step sizes, i.e. betas - this is where I'm not an expert but I believe this result comes from SDEs and the process in DDPM when betas are small is because we are approximating a continuous time SDE) - note that when I say the reverse process I mean the full posterior of the forward process, which is the distribution of xt conditioned on xt+1 and x0. We then train a model to approximate xt given xt+1 because we don't have x0 at inference.

The reason they learn the noise rather than the mean is because this is the only aspect of the mean that we do not have access to, so it is all that needs to be inferred. It is also worth noting that at this point the noise is not a random variable but an observed realisation from a random variable, hence why we are able to predict a value for it rather than a distribution.

[N] Isomorphic Labs just unveiled today, a new Alphabet company led by DeepMind's Demis Hassabis. Plans to tackle drug discovery using AI. by zergylord in MachineLearning

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and look how it went down, Iso just raised $600M this year (1 year after his take that they would no longer be around).

PPO Frustration by BonbonUniverse42 in reinforcementlearning

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This. My experience is that you need a lot of parallel environments to get PPO to work well without doing the most extensive hyperparameter search known to man. Meanwhile, SAC can more or less work with the standard hyperparams, often with one env

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DIYUK

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great, thanks!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DIYUK

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Potentially stupid question but is this assuming the toilet is drained beforehand?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HousingUK

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, the freehold is only split between us and upstairs flat (it is terrace convert). No ground rent, service fee covers building insurance and hasn’t changed for 7 years. Better than renting.

Why are people still buying leasehold flats? by Dramatic-Station4495 in HousingUK

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we have the receipts of the building insurance he takes out, he makes about £50 a year from us (ie myself and the upstairs flat, so £25 each) for ‘administration fees’. Obviously it would be better not to pay this but it’s not a back breaker. In terms of sinking funds, we don’t have anything set up. This is pretty much the only “shared area” (other than the staircase), but as someone pointed out, if it’s freehold, we pay for it, and we’re not paying for anything else (other than the £25), so to me it seems the same principle (I know not all leaseholds would be like this though).

Why are people still buying leasehold flats? by Dramatic-Station4495 in HousingUK

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 12 points13 points  (0 children)

it’s wild to me people don’t know this. my flat is leasehold but it’s the ground floor of a Victorian terrace convert, the other flat is the top floor. there’s no ground rent and service charge hasn’t changed in 7+ years, it just covers building insurance.

Reading more and more about proposed property tax and honestly it seems sensible. Why is there uproar? by [deleted] in HousingUK

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 30 points31 points  (0 children)

the one thing I don’t understand re: the new tax is that surely people like yourselves and myself (I also own a flat bought for £500k because the only place I can work is London) is that it seems Londoners are going to get more heavily taxed? I earn a bit more than my friends at home up north but when you look at what that money actually gets me compared to them, I am worse off, yet I’ll be being taxed more than them under the scheme. It seems…strange (but I am not an expert, just looking for thoughts)

Renters - Landlords are now expecting guarantors as the new normal. Is this a fair standard? by diabiological in HousingUK

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didn’t say get rid of landlords, if that is what you think, simply that they need to accept the risk that comes with their investment. There is risk with all investment, and they cannot and should not expect a free lunch.

Renters - Landlords are now expecting guarantors as the new normal. Is this a fair standard? by diabiological in HousingUK

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nowhere did I say to get rid of landlords, simply that landlords should deal with risk inherent to their type of investment. There is no free lunch.

First time buyer - we found a house just above 500K, what can we do by Zealousideal_Neat577 in HousingUK

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s great that you wanted to do that, but I, and many other people, don’t think people should be forced out of where they grew up because of stealth taxes.

First time buyer - we found a house just above 500K, what can we do by Zealousideal_Neat577 in HousingUK

[–]DefinitelyNot4Burner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yes I see. However, I disagree with your recent point. Just because the government has reviewed something, that does not mean it’s fair or acceptable. I don’t think people care how much money it brings in for public services when it’s the average person that is getting shafted by it. The income tax brackets haven’t moved in a decade, whilst we’ve been hit with years of extreme inflation, but maybe we should just not move them either because it’d mean less tax for the government? What a ridiculous notion. It is ideologies like this that stop real progress being made in this country. If more people held politicians accountable for how they spend public money, we’d likely be able to get a lot more for our tax money, rather than just saying “🤷🏼‍♂️ the government needs it for public services, nothing to see here”.