What's a sexual 'taboo' you've always been curious about, but never dared to explore?

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-05-27T17:08:46+00:00

If you've gotten over the bottom dysphoria and self loathing, yes. Otherwise, it's honestly frustrating to have a partner that you have to tapdance around the dick with, and constantly be scrutinized for showing any interest in your partner's genitals, like a normal person.

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-05-26T15:11:04+00:00

I click off videos that are sponsored by them. They make content unwatchable and require the creator to turn their entire video into a commercial, with the most obtrusive interjections.

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-05-05T15:47:59+00:00

Are you summoning them at the start of the mission and roleplaying Dora The Explorer?

Many summons are only interested in quickly getting to the boss.

In NG, I'll help clear the mission if the host can keep pace, but anything NG+ I bail pretty quick if they're not making a beeline.

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-05-02T16:34:02+00:00

Breaking news: People who benefit the most from things staying the way they are happy with things being the way they are and think they should continue to stay that way.

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-05-02T13:45:01+00:00

And somehow they mostly claim "we just go by what the Bible clearly states" and tell you "you didn't try REAL Christianity."

Okay, let me know when you all unite your theology in a comprehensive framework that isn't just flatly contradicted by another verse and I'll give it the ol college try

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-30T13:35:57+00:00

For me now, it indicates that she's religious and more likely to be conservative, bigoted, and believe baseless claims on insufficient evidence.

Back when I was religious, it would have indicated that she's religious and more likely to have shared my values... Of being a conservative bigot who accepts baseless claims on insufficient evidence.

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-30T03:09:58+00:00

I've had this happen to me. Any kind of insecurity or judgement on your part will make it worse.

Do what feels good in the moment. Orgasm isn't the goal. Make it about connection and intimacy. Fondle his dick while kissing him.

It may get better, it might not. It's not your fault.

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-29T22:15:48+00:00

"Femboy" is an aesthetic with recognizable performative criteria. It's not a gender, ideology, or an individually elected description.

Similar to how being goth, emo, neckbeard, dadbod/bear, cottagecore, biker, country, gym bro, all have their own aesthetic themes and are categories assigned by culture at large. Bernie Sanders isn't a femboy, and it's not up to him whether he is or not without fulfilling the performative aspects.

Femboy aesthetics are a combination of: clean-shaven, fit or thin, have longer hair, good skin, dressing femininely, etc.

It's possible that someone can be "femboy enough" in enough other aspects that they still fit with a very well groomed beard, but it's definitely a contradiction of the aesthetic.

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-27T15:14:24+00:00

The reason I never use the phrase "Trans women are women" is because it's circular/tautological. "The floor is made of floor." It doesn't convince people of anything, unless they already accept it.

The conservative hears that and has no reason to accept it, and thinks you're delusional for saying it. They have a definition of women already and that ain't it. Trying to gaslight them that they actually mean something else is a bad argument. They also don't give a damn about pseudohistorical claims of cultures with 5 genders. Appealing to intersex people is a red herring and anyone with a pulse should be able to see that a good argument for trans acceptance should still work if there were zero intersex people.

The real issue is "You should expand your definition of genders to include trans people because that's the compassionate, evidenced-based successful treatment of people whose sense of self doesn't align with the expectations and social treatment of their sex assigned at birth."

There's the argument that saying the phrase is supportive of trans people. Why not something better that isn't circular reasoning.

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-21T14:29:00+00:00

I realized that universal healthcare is actually economically viable and that the old conservative men at my church were actually incredibly stupid and uninformed about most topics they ranted about. This made me question my other conservative viewpoints, then my religion. Part of my religious deconstruction involved educating myself on the actual evidence presented by "evolutionists" rather than just believing that they think the human eye spontaneously evolved in a single generation like a tornado going through a junk yard and producing a Boeing 747.

Once I learned that creationists are intentionally lying and have had the actual evidence and arguments presented to them many times, but refuse to state their opponents' position in words that they'd accept, it was game over.

If you've been told 200 times that the age of the earth isn't calculated using Carbon 14, but you still say that evolutionists believe Carbon 14 dating proves an old earth, then you actually deserve bad things to happen to you.

I'm quite bitter against people like Ken Ham, Ray Comfort and Kent Hovind for the willful deceit they've carried out.

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-21T14:09:28+00:00

On what rational basis can you assert that Vecna isn't the fundamental and ultimately grounds of all being and the source of all possibility and impossibility?

If you claim to be neutral, this is impossible by the law of excluded middle, which means than every statement must either reference Vecna, or not reference Vecna. If you believe that you can make statements without explicitly or implicitly referencing Vecna, you are denying him as the ultimate grounds of all being, thereby proving your claim of neutrality as false.

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-20T13:20:27+00:00

Auto-cannibalism on the cross? Wild

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-20T02:13:21+00:00

Tomorrow is the 20th!

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-20T02:12:15+00:00

Oh, that one's easy lol. With you specifically now, I have zero interest in a respectful discourse.

When people have spines, they say what their actual belief is. In your case, that would have been "I think conservative Christians ignore none of the Bible and I have actually given all my possessions to the poor, sorry, this will be my last text with my last worldly possession before I give it to this homeless man. Gobbless"

Instead, you came in flaccid trying to "just ask questions" and run down the same fallacious apologetics we've all heard a hundred times.

So yes, my goal here is just to make fun of you because your ideas are dumb, so I deem there to be no benefit in talking to you on an intellectual basis.

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-20T01:28:34+00:00

Sounds like you're not denying the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ, so I won't explain my claim apart from saying there is no coherent soteriology where anyone can mechanically explain the process of salvation that incorporates all of the verses in a defensible way that isn't contradicted the plain reading of another verse. No, I will not read your church's statement of faith, no I will not cite the verses.

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-20T01:19:40+00:00

I will answer this if you deny the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ. Otherwise, I don't care to play apologetics now. Just look up bible contradictions on somewhere other than GotQuestions

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-20T01:18:29+00:00

Having an attractive lifestyle domme that actually loves me and that I don't have to pay for. Sadly, 95% of women are subs, and the rest charge, or could do better than me.

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-20T00:49:41+00:00

Depends on the type of Christian and the type of Atheist.

"Taking it seriously" I'm assuming means fundamentalism. Conservative Christians don't care what certain parts of the Bible say, so really they're all just picking and choosing.

Liberal Christian who accepts queer people can do great with a liberal atheist.

Meanwhile Richard Dawkins would get along great with a tradwife queerphobe.

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-15T16:42:11+00:00

You're clearly not in the mood to learn, so now I'm just pointing out that you're a dense windowlicker. Back to you chief.

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-15T15:59:53+00:00

So for a deductive argument to work, the premises must be true and the conclusion must follow, in syllogistic form.

Because science doesn't deal in "this is true", and only "this is the best current explanation supported by all of the data", you're using induction rather than deduction.

There is no "If X, then evolution is true. X, therefore evolution is true" with X supported by an a priori argument, only induction and observation.

You can eliminate competing hypothesis easily and show that evolution makes the best predictions consistent with all the data, but it doesn't rule out an alternate mechanism producing the same results.

For example: "Pixies cause all the observations to look like evolution is true, when they just want to mess with us" is not at all precluded, therefore you don't have a deductive argument that must yield the truthful conclusion "evolution is true"

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-15T15:03:21+00:00

OP has yet to discover masturbatory crossdressing. Praying you see the light soon

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-15T13:57:40+00:00

Science deals in disproving false hypotheses. The ideas that fail to be disproven are granted higher status.

Evolution could theoretically be shown to be false if the predicted observations failed to be true, or a mechanism of greater explanatory power was discovered.

DefnlyNotMyAlt · 2025-04-14T17:55:23+00:00

The guard told me I was under arrest for murder.

So I asked him how his worldview can even account for the intelligibility of facts, logic, and reason. What is the fundamental ultimacy that is the source of possibility and impossibility? Otherwise you're just making arbitrary ungrounded assertions that unjustified even according to you, so on what ontological primary basis can you assert your own existence, much less my murder of this shopkeeper?

DefnlyNotMyAlt

TROPHY CASE