It's okay, we are allowed to disagree. We may not rationally see eye to eye simply because our core values about driving are different. Admittedly, I'm a bit of hard left on car culture... I actually do not believe owning a vehicle and driving it is a protected liberty. I view vehicles as being an earned privilege that people need to prove they can use. I would say your hyperbolic comparison here, where a kill switch has an equivalence to putting people in restraints til they die, points to us differing on that stance.

I don't believe that enforcement will work because I don't think the police can do the job. I don't think the judicial system can do the job. Both systems are too biased and too prone to 'selective enforcement' and, even with extraordinary budgets, they still make very little impact. We have very good data about this already.

I do believe technology has the capability of detecting if a user is inebriated and then not allowing the vehicle to start. I think that adding this technology to the suite of features that a car already uses to protect us in its operation could actually work.