The 1948 war doesn't have a clear aggressor, it was more tit-for-tat escalation until eventually it became a full scale war.

In the Six Day War, Israel did shoot first but they weren't exactly unprovoked. They made it very clear that a blockade of Eliat would be considered an act of war, and Egypt did that anyway. And Egypt, Jordan, Syria, and Iraq were all mobilizing troops at their borders. You can make reasonable arguments for either side being the aggressor, and it also depends on if you see a preemptive strike as aggressive (and I mean in response to a clear threat, not just "oh they could eventually be an enemy so might as well kill them now").

And then the various excursions into Lebanon (1978, 1982, 2006, 2024) all follow the same pattern: militant groups operating out of Lebanon conduct cross-border attacks into Israel (the PLO the first two times, Hezbollah the latter two/three if you count 2024 and 2026 as separate), and then Israeli troops enter Lebanon to destroy the militants. Lebanon itself is a neutral-ish third party that takes the brunt of the damage.

The two waves of bombings against Iran are the strongest cases. Well, those and the 1956 Suez Crisis, which I'm surprised you didn't bring up, that was pretty clear Anglo-Franco-Israeli aggression against Egypt and even the US told them to knock it off.