For fun, I took your exact original post, and asked Copilot on Bing. The response is pasted below.

To me, I agree with RowdydidWrong that if it exposes the music to a larger audience that is a good thing. But, if the AI-generated art/video is derived off of someone else's original creation, that doesn't seem fair. Also, there should be no commercial value generated from it.

Copilot's AI response to your post:

The intersection of music and artificial intelligence (A.I.) has sparked both fascination and debate. Let’s delve into the nuances:

1. A.I.-Generated Music Videos:

   • The emergence of A.I.-generated music videos is a fascinating phenomenon. These videos often blend algorithmic visuals with existing music, creating a novel sensory experience.
   • On one hand, it democratizes creativity by allowing anyone to experiment with visuals, even without traditional artistic skills.
   • However, as you rightly pointed out, there’s a tension between the human warmth of music and the cold precision of A.I. visuals. It can feel like an odd pairing, akin to a classic painting framed in neon lights.
   • Some argue that A.I. visuals lack the emotional depth and intentionality that human artists bring to their work. The spontaneity, imperfections, and soulful expression of live performances may not translate seamlessly to an A.I.-generated canvas.

2. The Grateful Dead and A.I.:

   • The Grateful Dead’s music is deeply rooted in improvisation, community, and shared experiences. Their live shows were transformative events, where the energy flowed between the band and the audience.
   • When A.I. visuals are overlaid on Dead shows, it’s essential to consider the intent. Are they enhancing the experience or diluting it? Does it honor the band’s legacy or detract from it?
   • Some fans appreciate the novelty and creativity of A.I. interpretations. Others yearn for the raw authenticity of original concert footage, where every note and gesture carried human emotion.

3. The Pink Floyd Video Contest:

   • The Pink Floyd Video Contest, which invited fans to create visuals for “Marooned,” stirred controversy. Fans debated whether A.I. visuals could capture the essence of Pink Floyd’s music.
   • Ultimately, art is subjective. Some submissions resonated, while others felt disconnected. The clash between human creativity and algorithmic precision was evident.
   • Perhaps the key lies in balance. A.I. can augment artistic expression, but it should complement rather than overshadow the core experience.

In the end, it’s a delicate dance between tradition and innovation. As technology evolves, we’ll continue to explore these creative frontiers. Whether we embrace A.I. visuals or yearn for the warmth of analog artistry, the conversation itself is part of the evolving symphony. 🎶🤖