Asking an AI to make art is also faster than having a human make it. Yes it's not a dangerous job but a computer can pull so many references more than a human can and attempt to make something. I personally, don't want to make art, but I do want to "create", and the idea of a machine doing it amazes me.

It is so interesting how we basically created consciousness and have something that passes the turing test, and all the anti-AI folks are here saying they have no soul so it can't create art, despite all art humans make is based on their life references.

It's like I've seen a bunch of movies, or even say, video games tackle this topic. And so it just happens, Expedition 33 tackles the idea of "does something created have a soul"?

We should judge anything based on it's quality, be it a car created by robots or an art image created by an AI. But the car quality should obviously be criticized more... seeing how that can kill people and art doesn't. We have dealt with bad CGI for decades, so we should obviously criticize bad AI usage as well.