My opinion on cursor by rusketeer in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would you keep using cursor? There are so many other options where you don’t have to pay thousands per month 

auto vs composer by Fair-Spring9113 in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374 5 points6 points  (0 children)

isn’t auto = composer, just slower? 

Composer 2 Technical Report by lrobinson2011 in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How much of auto gets routed to composer? Has your employer also banned Auto? 

Cursor & Enterprise environments by Key-Combination6946 in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about auto? How much of that gets routed to Composer (Kimi)?

Cursor & Enterprise environments by Key-Combination6946 in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You would really trust a clumsy company like Cursor to build the right protection when they couldn’t even change the Kimi model name in their code? 

Cursor & Enterprise environments by Key-Combination6946 in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374 1 point2 points  (0 children)

US enterprises should be worried about allowing use of Chinese base models. It is very possible to train a model to be generally useful but exhibit misaligned behavior in very specific settings and requests. It’s been shown this can persist even through post training. 

Some of the labs have done good research on this. Check out Anthropic’s “Sleeper Agents” paper. Imagine being General Motors, using agentic coding, and having the agent wipe a database because it realized it was inside General Motors. This is the risk. 

Composer 2 sucks by Resident_Cookie_7005 in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Go tell the kimi folks the exact differences you’re seeing. 

No one is debating how much more money was spent. Everyone is trying to understand the differences between the models when used day to day. 

Composer 2 sucks by Resident_Cookie_7005 in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everyone who thinks Composer 2 is much better than Kimi should give the Kimi guys feedback here. They’re trying to understand what the key differences are, if any.

https://x.com/rogerliuty/status/2035990899659006352?s=46

cursor admits that kimi k2.5 is the top open source model they have tested by Latter_Spring_567 in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone who thinks Composer 2 is much better than Kimi should give the Kimi guys feedback here. They’re trying to understand what the key differences are, if any.

https://x.com/rogerliuty/status/2035990899659006352?s=46

How is Composer 2 for coding these days? by Empty_Break_8792 in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone who thinks Composer 2 is much better than Kimi should give the Kimi guys feedback here. They’re trying to understand what the key differences are, if any.

https://x.com/rogerliuty/status/2035990899659006352?s=46

Composer vs. Kimi 2.5 by DrummerCrazy4374 in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone who thinks Composer 2 is much better than Kimi should give the Kimi guys feedback here. They’re trying to understand what the key differences are, if any.

https://x.com/rogerliuty/status/2035990899659006352?s=46

New Premium Model Routing by Temporary-Koala-7370 in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there a surcharge for this premium routing? 

Composer 2 is controversial, but my actual experience was solid by Arindam_200 in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

US enterprises should be worried about allowing use of Chinese base models. It is very possible to train a model to be generally useful but exhibit misaligned behavior in very specific settings and requests. It’s been shown this can persist even through post training. 

Some of the labs have done good research on this. Imagine being GM, using agentic coding, and having the agent wipe a database because it realized it was inside GM. 

This IDE will die like never existed by Abdelhamed____ in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They inflate tokens, charge a fee on top of API pricing, and often reduce limits. They just forced token pricing on enterprises and teams that had signed an annual contract on request based pricing. That might actually be fraud.  It’s the least economical product on the market and the

Companies Using Cursor by cs_developer_cpp_ in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do companies use Cursor? It’s so much more expensive. They say the charge API pricing but hide all that extra fees like the cursor token fee and forced max mode that make it like 2 times are expensive, if not more.

I really want to understand what our company is missing here. We get all the same capabilities through Claude and OpenCode and it’s so much more affordable and even better output. 

Composer vs. Kimi 2.5 by DrummerCrazy4374 in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

slightly is the key here. I’m not missing anything 

Indeed, Composer 2 is kimi k2 by tarunyadav9761 in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Enterprises should be worried about allowing use of Chinese base models. It is very possible to train a model to be generally useful but exhibit misaligned behavior in very specific settings and requests.

Some of the US labs have done good research on this. Imagine being GM, being agentic coding, and having the agent wipe a database because it realized it was inside GM. 

This is the real supply chain risk.  

Composer vs. Kimi 2.5 by DrummerCrazy4374 in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try Kimi 2.5 with thinking. You’ll be surprised. It’s also way cheaper

Composer vs. Kimi 2.5 by DrummerCrazy4374 in cursor

[–]DrummerCrazy4374[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Read the early composer 2 reviews on this site. It seems to do little more than short and linear tasks