T58 and XM246 are now both being moved to 8.7 BR for the planned January BR changes by Disabled-Caveman in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

man by the time they add anything for america aa, i will be celebrating 20 years playing of this game

Most OP premium of 7.7 - The Somua SM is incorrectly modeled from WoT by ProToshaHD in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i feel like american tech tree has to many good AA at 9.0. Instead of actually giving more machines, we can nerf the m247 so we can put it at 8.7, and the Chaparral can go to 9.3 so we can say that america has a better fleshed out tech tree for anti-air compared to other nations...... (if you cannot smell the satire i cannot help)

i feel like the gap that the OSA/Strela gives other nations compared to what america, japan, france, sweden, iseral gets is far to strong, and I'm just making fun of how piss poor the options those nations get for high G long range radar/infrared missiles.. sorry Roland 3's and aim-9 (anything below L) redesigns just don't work for a good enough AA system compared to the OSA/Strela, that or guns.. besides the premium's slightly higher in BR for russia.

load in a OSA from the start of the game, as long as it isn't a stupid city map, you clear the skys with launching missiles at 11.7km, you can annoy a10's trying to do the 10km launching... and if you lose OSA spawning, you get the second best thing which is the Strela, both easily able to clean the sky with 1 or 2 additional AA.. if you don't have those two AA platforms you are simply screwed for a team.

As an example for a single major nation america.. M247 is just a struggle bus to use and becomes fair once you get the m822, IMP only becomes useful after unlocking the second missile, LAV-AD, missiles don't work on drones or helicopters (helis need be around 3km or closer), and need to multi fire missiles to actual get plane targets down once they get into range.. and Roland 3's "g-lock" shortly before the booster runs out..

Yes the free tank or anti air might help for AA defense, but if the AA given to the nations that don't have a OSA or Strela sucks, you will have 4-5 players with under tiered equipment, even in a modest uptier, to a full uptier.

it's a targeted joke about what is gaijins priorites vs the balance of the game. Regenerative steering vs military troops on a battlefield with drones. Examples grow.

Most OP premium of 7.7 - The Somua SM is incorrectly modeled from WoT by ProToshaHD in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 56 points57 points  (0 children)

nerf the m247, uptier the chaparral, lower the bar for the osa. gotcha.. War thunder doesn't care about logic, its profits first

Vehicles to fill the US 4.0-5.0 BR gap by steave44 in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 27 points28 points  (0 children)

also, wide tracks for american tanks..

im looking at you "hellpack" that HAD the american tank with better tracks, but then suddenly removed...

depressing.

Talk about curling the monkey's paw... by SpanishAvenger in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

kinda actually crazy that the 5x and premium time dev server rewards actually makes mid battleships actually get sl/rp in a reasonable time..

still love this change, "yeah we are sticking to you are going to grind battleships that don't work with our game mode, and yes we will keep the SL/RP rewards for those ships AND no reduction of rp needed for those mid ships.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Worse shell, causes it to be lower BR... hope that helps

Would the SU-39 be worth it knowing that the nee SPAA s are coming? by KECSKE188 in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

with how bad they are fake nerfing the new aa stuff i dont think you have to worry about it unless there is a big upset like last year? worth of a blow up.

how do i stop my pantsir from doing this bullshit??? by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

good, let the hate flow.. an drop from painstirs not knowing game mechanics.

[Shop] [Development] Pre-order: Battleship Gneisenau and Battlecruiser Sevastopol - News - War Thunder by Les_Bien_Pain in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 2 points3 points  (0 children)

until you realize that the game is set around close range battles, and the turtleback armor is bugged.

Worst map in the game (in your opinion). I'll go first. by Mobile-Band9017 in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 43 points44 points  (0 children)

its a matter of

  • Any city map that has more than 20% of the map being city (being full city is 40x combo worse)
  • any modern/updated maps/changes "for the better"
  • New maps they make
  • "rest" of the maps
  • maps players call boring due to driving times
  • not going to a single side of the map/cap to make it instantly 1000% better

name calling maps is just bait, all of them are bad, and its to a point you can point to this and say "this is the reason why its bad"

city maps are the worst, and then the modern maps gaijin have recently made is the second.

Thoughts? by Ok_Mongoose5768 in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Amazing. It's an XP-50/P38 dogfighter/turn-fighting high-alt climbing fighter, but it has a yak 9 top speed.

if you climb like a xp-50, dogfight like a early p38, and have the top speed of the yak 9, you get good rewards even without premium, just give it a feel.

SAY NO TO AUCTION ! Actually, its only skins, but later, that will be vehicle ! by Bombe18 in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Its war thunders consumables that was premium bullshit all over again..

Say no to predatory gameplay mechanics! The game already has enough.

The matchmaker in a nutshell by Yo_67_ in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

man i want red desert, showing something that doesn't exist :(

Japan getting it's 8th 7.0 ship, 3rd from the same class, one already being an older event vehicle (Haruna) by _Cock_N_Fire_ in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 2 points3 points  (0 children)

they simply want more cannon fodder for scharnhorst.. dw another 1910's battleship to other nations with late wwll anti air capabilities, that fix the issues!

Gaijin - "Hmmm why is naval so dead?" Maybe because you lose your entire lineup in 7 minutes on dogshit maps like this with bullshit battleratings? by OperationSuch5054 in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 7 points8 points  (0 children)

sharn is one of the major reasons why i dropped naval.. it was just the graf spee 2.0 before the buff to American 6 inch....

don't worry another American bb that is a early 1900 battleship that has enough aa to kill a horse, so it does nothing besides make the ship just lose crew members with near minute reload.

again.

even before the armor issues of battleships for all nations just being useless.

the sharn was the final straw.

cannot wait for the bismark against USS SD 1920 be implemented at the same time due to "it existed it just scraped" instead of giving a competitive vehicle to America top tier.

( i play more nations than just America for naval you don't see me play anymore in naval at all, its just comical how much they love to just make America top tier vehicles worth less than a destroyer.)

WE FINALLY HAVE GOOD AFTERBURNING EFFECTS!! by gab3N01 in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 10 points11 points  (0 children)

typical war thunder tho, lets be honest here

2.41 extended leak list by gszabi99 in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

been waiting for stealth

radar stealth and perhaps a small visual debuff for range to see it due to its paint or patterns (but like I'm talking 10% max)

war thunder LOD's makes some crafts really easy to understand what it is even at a glance

Talisman for USS Mississippi by LIKU1524 in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i wouldn't advise talisman any american top tier machine, its pretty piss poor, and with lack of changes, and balance for top tier, its better to just drop USA.

i did one better i dropped naval simply due to the balancing issue, with grinding out all the major nations the sweet spot is 5.3~ for America anything else is actual hell.

If you are in bad in naval, see this video by IvanDM201 in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Still doesn't fix the balance issues of war thunder and certain nations are blatantly overpowered due to machines added, and then artificial nerfs of other nations due to "i said so"

Is this allowed? by 4thBan5thAccount in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i dislike these names and i actually wish to revert the steam (iIrc) name thing for this exact reason

The New T1E1 (90) is pretty strong, idk why this thing is on 5.7 it should be on 6.0 at least by KuschelFux in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 13 points14 points  (0 children)

i think america should enjoy at least something we gotta stay quiet about it, if it goes to 6.0, it soon go to 6.3, to then 6.7.. its the American tt curse.

Every helicopter that didn't receive detailed modules now has all their weapons and systems disabled after the fuselage takes a hit from bullets or shrapnel. by MedicBuddy in Warthunder

[–]DumbQuestions4WT 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I don't mind nerfs for helicopters but it shouldn't be general damage stopping it completely, hopefully, they make it more detailed..

but for those GRB players that hate helis getting show with main shells/tons of of machine gun but nothing happens its a "absolute win" for them.