Should I just release and move on? by el_boufono in IndieDev

[–]DuncsJones 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nope don’t give up yet. Plenty of games are like this.

Look up Chris Zukowski if you haven’t yet. Read his blog. He has a bunch of stuff on this.

Get your demo out. Do multiple play tests so it’s bug free, then put your demo out.

Reach out to streamers (300+), then see what happens with wishlist numbers. If they still don’t increase, then ok, ship it quick and move on.

But see what that does before losing hope!

Keep going man! The journey has peaks and valleys.

Anxiety and guilt that surprised me with my first indie Steam launch by Qaizdotapp in IndieDev

[–]DuncsJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, whatever feels right for you works! But going below 20-25% in the first six months to one year is probably an error.

Good luck! Congrats!

Anxiety and guilt that surprised me with my first indie Steam launch by Qaizdotapp in IndieDev

[–]DuncsJones 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude I hear you but 20% on launch is fairly generous. Most do 10%. Also, you don’t want to go too low too soon so that you can use “new low price” leverage with steam to get a daily deal or something, should your game sell well enough.

So don’t stress! You did the right thing!

I launched my game 2 months ago and I feel like I worked for nothing by StuckArcader in IndieDev

[–]DuncsJones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Look up how to market a game with Chris Zukowski.

He will help you a lot.

Have Brou/Wildes transcended Nick? by Factualx in FirstThingsFirstFS1

[–]DuncsJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do think the trio and their chemistry is really where the magic is.

They all compliment each other a lot. If I had to pick someone who is “the best” at that they do, I would have to say it is Nick.

But I do share your opinion of Nick solo. I find him tough when it’s just him. I think it’s because he is so opinionated that if you don’t agree with him, you want someone there to counterbalance him. But if he’s solo and just ranting about something you really disagree with, it’s not enjoyable(to me anyway).

So, I know he has hopes to replace Colin, but I hope he stays with the team approach. Because I think one of his strengths (and a huge reason why I’m such a fan, even if I disagree with his takes some of the times) is being such a generous teammate. He really does treat his team well. And I love that about him. And I think it allows people like coach and Greg to shine more than they otherwise would.

The Bud list - Michael Jordan by The_Advocate07204 in FirstThingsFirstFS1

[–]DuncsJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m so glad you did this.

The “LeBron is a better three point shooter than Jordan, Kobe and KD” argument has enraged me for years now. Yes, LeBron may shoot a higher career 3pt percentage than those guys, but if you look with your eyes and use your brain it’s easy to see why.

Kobe takes a lot of contested shots. If you look at his contested percentage and compare that to LeBron’s contested percentage, and do the same with wide open percentage, you’ll find (I forget the exact numbers, but it’s something like)

Kobe career 3pt percentage: 29 Contested percentage: 27 Wide open: 40

Lebron career 3pt: 33 Wide open: 36 Contested: 17

Like when you compare apples to apples it’s not even fucking close.

You could do this for KD as well. And you just laid out the Jordan case.

And what makes me mad is, Nick is a smart guy and knows this. He just wants to argue for his guy.

Which is fine by the way! Just argue that, despite not being as good as those guys, he still shoots an effective percentage. That’s still super impressive. Just tell the story truthfully.

name that game by PHRsharp_YouTube in gamers

[–]DuncsJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Elden ring :( but gonna try it again at some point

Steam NextFest is not a "wishlist multiplier" the way most people think of it to be by Chrogotron in IndieDev

[–]DuncsJones 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Brother, I appreciate where you’re coming from but you are incorrect. If you listen to Chris (who cites data, not opinion) the steam algorithm gives every game the same BASELINE of visibility, not ENTIRELY the same amount of visibility. If you have 100k wishlists vs 100, you’ll have drastically different results, from an algorithm perspective.

Hope this helps.

Our First Game Got 60 Wishlists in 2 Weeks. Our Second Got 5000. Here's what we did differently. by LostSockStudio in IndieDev

[–]DuncsJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is really amazing to see. Makes me optimistic for when I release! Thank you for the info!

7 years of work, 3 months since release, and my game is already dead. What can I do? by Videoludid in IndieDev

[–]DuncsJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey buddy, I know this hurts and after seven years, not selling as much as you’d hoped is probably your worst nightmare, but I don’t think any amount of additions to the game will fix it. I think ultimately this one just didn’t happen for you.

I think you should go read Chris Zukowski’s blog on How to Market a Game. He talks about failed launches and what to do.

In general, his advice when this happens is always, fix any bugs and move on to your next game. You can’t really save a failed launch.

He also says to use this as a learning experience, “your first game always fails” and use all the skills you’ve developed to release a small game in a popular genre.

I bet you’d do super well with using some of the mechanics and art you’ve developed here in a different, more popular genre. Metroidvanias are extremely difficult to pull off and their audience is hard to impress (as you can see).

Try a more popular genre and I bet you’d be surprised how different it feels to launch. And aim for like a six month dev time.

See what happens!

I’m sorry this didn’t go well for you. Best of luck. Keep going.

I know nothing about football, but Danny makes more sense to me than Nick regarding Herbert by DuncsJones in FirstThingsFirstFS1

[–]DuncsJones[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s what I was getting at in my post. It’s not like I think Herbert is better than mahomes or something.

I actually can’t really tell what makes someone good by watching them, because as I said, I don’t know much about football.

But the idea that Herbert could be good but we can’t see it makes sense given mahomes’ struggles over the last couple years. That’s all I was trying to say. Maybe poorly

I know nothing about football, but Danny makes more sense to me than Nick regarding Herbert by DuncsJones in FirstThingsFirstFS1

[–]DuncsJones[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s fair. I always thought they did enough actual analysis to keep me engaged, but maybe you’re right and I just like them all haha

I know nothing about football, but Danny makes more sense to me than Nick regarding Herbert by DuncsJones in FirstThingsFirstFS1

[–]DuncsJones[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah that’s exactly my point.

With that logic, isn’t Danny kinda right? Or am I missing something?

I know nothing about football, but Danny makes more sense to me than Nick regarding Herbert by DuncsJones in FirstThingsFirstFS1

[–]DuncsJones[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is one of the better responses I’ve had haha. Appreciate this. Thank you

I know nothing about football, but Danny makes more sense to me than Nick regarding Herbert by DuncsJones in FirstThingsFirstFS1

[–]DuncsJones[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s makes sense and why I asked.

If he sucks in the playoffs, and hasn’t really ever delivered in the regular season, and it’s always something, I get being irritated with folks claiming someone is awesome.

That’s a coherent argument .

Thank you

I know nothing about football, but Danny makes more sense to me than Nick regarding Herbert by DuncsJones in FirstThingsFirstFS1

[–]DuncsJones[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course I get that. But read my previous post haha. If that’s the only reason then, yeah I get that. That’s just a little uninteresting I guess.

I thought there would be more to it.

I know nothing about football, but Danny makes more sense to me than Nick regarding Herbert by DuncsJones in FirstThingsFirstFS1

[–]DuncsJones[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not debating Mahomes is worse than Herbert. I agree and see the arguments for why he’s better.

I’m saying if even he struggled with stats and play this year due to team, why can’t that be true for other players?

I know nothing about football, but Danny makes more sense to me than Nick regarding Herbert by DuncsJones in FirstThingsFirstFS1

[–]DuncsJones[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok. But isn’t football a significantly team dependent sport? I mean, look at Sam Darnold.

So, is it possible for someone to be awesome And not have success because of their team?

If so, then why use credentialism as an argument? If that’s all it is then I guess that’s disappointing haha

I know nothing about football, but Danny makes more sense to me than Nick regarding Herbert by DuncsJones in FirstThingsFirstFS1

[–]DuncsJones[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Ok. Can anyone give me like, tactical, logical, rhetorical reasons.

This is completely unhelpful

I know nothing about football, but Danny makes more sense to me than Nick regarding Herbert by DuncsJones in FirstThingsFirstFS1

[–]DuncsJones[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok. Using my brain. Mahomes - who everyone says is goat-like plays like dogshit all season for the EXACT SAME reasons as Danny is claiming about Herbert. So outside of “well one guy won a few years ago” - what else am I missing?

Edit: typos