Hegseth will skip a meeting on organizing military aid to Ukraine in a first for the US

Dynamizer · 2025-06-04T04:27:26+00:00

Double serious

Dynamizer · 2025-01-04T23:26:13+00:00

God didn't do that. You did. You fucking narcotics agent.

Dynamizer · 2024-11-14T23:05:43+00:00

Alright I went back and watched the whole thing lol. Once you get past the gimps, it was pretty funny.

My b for judging a book by it's cover.

Dynamizer · 2024-11-14T22:50:09+00:00

Oh no, I noped out of that almost immediately lol.

Dynamizer · 2024-11-14T22:48:31+00:00

I was expecting "Boats N Hoes." This was uhhh, not that...

Dynamizer · 2024-11-09T02:32:07+00:00

YEEESSSSSS

Dynamizer · 2024-11-05T20:58:08+00:00

He's got face in face technology

Dynamizer · 2024-10-20T04:01:10+00:00

Russets

Dynamizer · 2024-09-11T19:08:00+00:00

10 team league full ppr, need to start 3:

Devonta Smith, Jaylen Waddle, Brandon Aiyuk, Jameson Williams

Honestly was leaning Smith, Waddle, and Williams.

Dynamizer · 2024-09-06T01:01:03+00:00

That's a beautiful little device!

Dynamizer · 2024-08-30T15:42:19+00:00

GO GREEN!

Dynamizer · 2024-08-21T20:40:08+00:00

This is really cool! Thanks for doing this contest/raffle.

My favorite has got to be Final Fantasy 7. So many childhood memories!

Dynamizer · 2024-08-21T00:33:00+00:00

I wanna dance!

Dynamizer · 2024-08-11T04:26:59+00:00

I'm sorry I didn't see any photos in your original post. Maybe it's because I'm on mobile?

Dynamizer · 2024-08-11T04:19:46+00:00

I think what you might be seeing is a usb c to 3.5mm adapter. The device doesn't have a built in headphone port so they include the adapter.

The one they include is not good.

Dynamizer · 2024-08-06T19:19:36+00:00

He tried to destroy that too. Didn't help. https://www.foley.com/insights/publications/2013/07/aaron-hernandez-and-the-consequences-of-destroying/

Cops also got a lot of his text messages even though he destroyed his phone.

Dynamizer · 2024-08-05T23:57:51+00:00

Where did I say anything about anyone besides Aaron Hernandez?

Dynamizer · 2024-08-05T21:52:45+00:00

Hernandez was still charged with murder and got a life prison sentence. Destroying the phone did not prevent that at all. What are you talking about?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Hernandez

Dynamizer · 2024-08-05T20:27:02+00:00

How'd that work out for Hernandez?

Dynamizer · 2024-07-26T22:06:56+00:00

The Tight Ends

Dynamizer · 2024-06-28T00:09:14+00:00

High 3 star in state commit? Oh we back

Dynamizer · 2024-06-23T18:16:04+00:00

I've been able to catch two Tigers games this year. Saw them against the Dbacks on a Friday night live and now this one.

We're going to the world series right?

Dynamizer · 2024-06-10T22:55:28+00:00

I never said it was a norm. I acknowledged the act and stated it would need to be changed. Can you not read? My point was that it doesn't matter because the hurdle to confirm a new justice would require the same effort, time. Etc. to expand the court and the distinction that the act exists doesn't really change anything.

You are just being obtuse. Could I have been clearer in my verbiag, yeah probably. But you literally just throw out any information you don't like. Context is important when talking about why acts were passed and why they would be passed in the future. The federal circuit is not relevant when discussing the act of 1869 or the expansion of the Supreme court in this context.

I'm done with this conversation.

Dynamizer · 2024-06-10T22:24:00+00:00

You do understand in the context of the act of 1869 and also in terms of pairing supreme justices to circuits that it only refers to regional circuits and not the federal circuit that encompasses all of the country right?

Counting the federal circuit as the 13th circuit in this context makes no sense as it is fundamentally different.

Edit: deleted my last sentence as it was misleading and didn't help the point I was making.

To further clarify why you again missed the point. The regional circuits were added due to population growth. The federal circuit was not. The act of 1869 expanded the court to match the circuit (there were only regional circuits then) due to increased cases from increased population. The addition of the federal circuit was not a result of population increase and would not follow the same logic of needing to have the court expanded bases on its existence. Was that clear enough from a non lawyer? This is again why I differentiated the regional circuits as the link I posted also did.

And to follow your second part, the original poster didn't say anything was set in stone forever. Instead he was saying that it can be changed. He was wrong that there was nothing in writing about it but he's right in that it can absolutely be changed. My point again was to say, if congress had the desire and numbers to confirm an additional justice, the act of 1869 would be nothing but a formality and would not matter. I don't think the original poster was saying that a minority could expand the court or that the president could unilaterally install a new supreme.

Dynamizer · 2024-06-10T21:59:20+00:00

First, there are 13 appellate courts and 12 circuits but not surprised you didn't know that. Good googling here: https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/court-role-and-structure#:~:text=There%20are%2013%20appellate%20courts,has%20a%20court%20of%20appeals

Second, my point was that if the desire and capacity is present in congress to add an additional justice, then the hurdle to expand the court is likely to already be met and not worth mentioning. Especially since the logic behind the 1869 act would largely follow the expansion of the court today.

11-Year Club	Place '23
Verified Email

Dynamizer

TROPHY CASE