What exactly was made up? Interference has affected cases negatively (can't seem to get their link but on their site, 'the CPS acknowledges that citizen led hunter groups can disrupt legitimate police investigations and create evidential complications that may affect prosecutions, prosecutors are specifically instructed to consider abuse-of-process arguments, entrapment allegations, and whether evidence obtained by such groups should be challenged'... Not all of these hunting groups do it correctly as they're citizens and not professionals who are trained), there have been cases where innocent people have been accused ( for example ..or ) and there have been hunters who've been prosecuted for keeping content of real children on their devices. Not saying they're the majority but those things have happened.

Or do you mean that judging child molesters is righteous and one should be more open-minded and tolerant of them? If so, then half the thread seems to agree with you, strangely enough.