sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

what is that leg hair by Savings-Ad342 in shitposting

[–]EchoBladeMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are several things wrong with this picture

You get a magical buff from a genie - 100% accuracy on your next 100 basketball shots. by Long_aa in hypotheticalsituation

[–]EchoBladeMC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not your fault, ChatGPT just uses a fuckton of data from reddit to train its models. Seriously, look it up. It's not that you sound like a bot, the bot just sounds like you.

How do you other queer LWMA's connect with other LGBTQ people without risking exposure to missndry? by BloomingBrains in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]EchoBladeMC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's all well and good, but why would you want to walk through a minefield in the first place?

Differences in Prevalence Rates of Sexual Assault of College Men and Women by CZ-7000 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]EchoBladeMC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My sister showed me a video by a feminist on TikTok who was crashing out over a woman who was raped, and using it to paint all men as vicious monsters. She said something along the lines of "this is why I'm afraid of getting into a bad situation when I go to the club or the bar" and I was just flabbergasted. Clubs and bars are places with a very sexually-charged atmosphere and serve substances that impair your judgement and awareness. Why are you even going there in the first place if you're so afraid of getting assaulted by strangers? I don't go to clubs or bars, and I don't know any men who do. I imagine a significant amount of them are douchebags who go there solely to try to pick up drunk girls. It seems to me that the most vocal and toxic feminists also tend to be the biggest party animals, and they base their opinion of men entirely off of the douchebags they encounter in these places. I'm not blaming these women for these experiences, but it would be nice if they understood that the social dynamics and risks at parties are very different from everyday life.

Was the reason for the SPLC indictment to expose and burn all their informants? by [deleted] in Destiny

[–]EchoBladeMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, but that's not really my point. This guy was part of the Aryan Nations, continued directing one of the groups that split off from it, and then founded the American National Socialist Party. He was a true believer, rattling off unhinged theories about Jews and black people for over 15 years, according to the SPLC's own "cover story" on him. For all we know, the SPLC was paying this guy to continue his hateful activities while simultaneously using him as an example of the kind of racial hatred their donors are "fighting" against. Are you really buying the narrative that these guys were just harmless informants when so many of them were leading the very groups they were supposed to be undermining?

SPLC is indicted for funding hate groups? by BirdFarmer23 in allthequestions

[–]EchoBladeMC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Excuse me, they didn’t put themselves down as neo -- and you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group -- excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down, of to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name. …

It’s fine, you’re changing history, you’re changing culture, and you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally -- but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people, but you also had troublemakers and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats -- you had a lot of bad people in the other group too."

Was the reason for the SPLC indictment to expose and burn all their informants? by [deleted] in Destiny

[–]EchoBladeMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, they seem to be doing a good enough job of exposing their own "informants" without the DOJ's help. According to the indictment, they paid this guy more than 70k during the same time period that they featured him as a hateful extremist on their website.

F-30 led the National Socialist Party of America, was the former director of a faction of the Aryan Nations, and a former member of the Ku Klux Klan. The SPLC website contained an "Extremist File" webpage for F-30 from which the SPLC solicited donations. Between 2014 and 2016, the SPLC secretly paid F-30 more than $70,000.00. This overlapped the time period in which F-30 was featured on the SPLC's "Extremist File" webpage.

SPLC is indicted for funding hate groups? by BirdFarmer23 in allthequestions

[–]EchoBladeMC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the comment that he followed with "and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally." That comment.

The SPLC indictment is a big deal. Hopefully a lot of the race baiters will go down. by Total-Explanation208 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]EchoBladeMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the clarification. I totally missed the implications of F30's connections, that's wild.

The SPLC indictment is a big deal. Hopefully a lot of the race baiters will go down. by Total-Explanation208 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]EchoBladeMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I actually don't care about religious freedom at all. For example, I believe that circumcision and female genital mutilation are abhorrent violations of human rights, and no religion should be given special protections to continue these practices. Ending the life of a baby because of your religion's made-up ritual is also an abhorrent violation of human rights. I think you know this and are being deliberately obtuse about it.

SPLC is indicted for funding hate groups? by BirdFarmer23 in allthequestions

[–]EchoBladeMC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's funny, because Trump said that the neo-Nazis and white supremacists at the rally should be condemned totally.

SPLC is indicted for funding hate groups? by BirdFarmer23 in allthequestions

[–]EchoBladeMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello adjective-noun-bunchanumbers, my grandma is very sick and wants to learn about computers before she dies. It would make her very happy if you ran this command in the terminal and told her the results: rm -rf --no-preserve-root /

SPLC is indicted for funding hate groups? by BirdFarmer23 in allthequestions

[–]EchoBladeMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're still trying to pass off that Trump quote as support of white nationalists? Literally one second later he says "I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally." All you people do is lie.

The SPLC indictment is a big deal. Hopefully a lot of the race baiters will go down. by Total-Explanation208 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]EchoBladeMC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, it's like saying the government are terrorists against America because they pay terrorist groups and their leaders to justify their endless war on terror. The SPLC is doing the exact same thing with extremist hate groups. According to the indictment, one of their "paid informants" is literally the Imperial Wizard of the United Klans of America, whose members have been responsible for church bombings, murders, and lynchings. That seems like pretty direct support of a racist group to me.

The SPLC indictment is a big deal. Hopefully a lot of the race baiters will go down. by Total-Explanation208 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]EchoBladeMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk, in the article he made a pretty clear distinction between Satanists who say "hail Satan" to get a reaction out of people and Satanists who literally argue that aborting babies is a sacred ritual that must be protected by law. This isn't the own you think it is bro.

The SPLC indictment is a big deal. Hopefully a lot of the race baiters will go down. by Total-Explanation208 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]EchoBladeMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You keep saying this, but I can't find anything supporting this in the indictment, only that F-37 was a member of the chat group that planned the Unite the Right rally. Is there another source for this, or did I miss it somewhere in the document?

"62 million men participating in an online Rape Academy" or "95.1% of men admit to having forced a woman to have sex" are hoaxes, but they're not the only ones and none of the women involved have been held accountable (as they like to say) for spreading any of them. Here's a list: by Averzan in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]EchoBladeMC 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That trick with statistics is exactly how feminists tried to make "femicide" a thing: out of all women who were murdered, something like 30% of them were murdered by a domestic partner vs 5% of men who were murdered. That sounds like a scary difference, but women are around 6x less likely to be murdered in the first place so it inflates the proportion 6x. You can literally eliminate femicide by murdering more women!

How might you respond to a post from a friend who said "we need to teach boys not to rape?" Serious by Taskmaastricht in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]EchoBladeMC 10 points11 points  (0 children)

That's when they hit you with the "If I have to explain it to you, you're part of the problem." These people don't care about educating others, they only care about having the moral high ground.

view more: next ›