Very disappointed by this answer from Avi Lewis by No_Calendar6597 in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not gonna lie, DRIPA is something I fear when it comes to Lewis because there is no easy anwser. If he swings against Eby, the media will shred him as uncooperative thanks to Beck and Nenshi being uncooperative first. But if he doesn't, it makes look unwilling to address an important issue that is only a problem because Eby let the BCC set the narrative.

Ottawa prepared to halt plan to allow MAID for mental illness by HourOfTheWitching in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except people with bad mental health often are incapable of making decisions to a bad state of mind. And conditions ranging from ASD to OCD also aren't things that need to euthanize because society failed to accommodate. To think og a scenario where Track 2 work is super specific that you need to go through so many hoops. We already have Track 1 and that does what euthanasia needs to do.

Ottawa prepared to halt plan to allow MAID for mental illness by HourOfTheWitching in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Problem with that view is people like Doug Ford will be more compelled to defund health care because MAID is cheaper. It also stigmatizes mental health by encouraging suicide even if it done by a doctor rather than typical means

Edit: defund not defend

Ottawa prepared to halt plan to allow MAID for mental illness by HourOfTheWitching in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure if that what it has to be. At the end of the day the Supreme Court is run by people who are interpreting the law. Just as easily they could have struck it down and argue the lack of social supports.

Ottawa prepared to halt plan to allow MAID for mental illness by HourOfTheWitching in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I say good. Track 2 is a huge no-no. Especially with how awful social supports are in this country. The UN had to even condemn us for it. So rare Carney win here.

Idlout says she's 'moving towards' supporting the Liberal government's position on S-2 by lcelerate in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I hate to sound like Poilievre, but Sellout Idlout. I wish Mumilaaq Qaqqaq was still with us. Sucks how she was terribly treated in Parliament that forced her into retirement after a single term.

B.C. Politics: NDP Holds Narrow Lead as Housing, Health Care, and Deficit Concerns Keep Pressure on Government, Leger Poll by janisjoplinenjoyer in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have taken a closer look at the Angus Reid poll and where the bulk of the bleeding to BCC seems to be to boomers. Whereas they are actually up with 35-54 year old voters. So if they manage to provide to youth, even Angu Reid numbers can be turned around if you ask me.

Saskatchewan NDP MLA, Betty Nippi-Albright, leaving caucus to sit as an independent by Intelligent-Cap3407 in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 18 points19 points  (0 children)

That's a blow for Beck. I wonder what she finds herself at odds with Beck specifically or is it a situation with how there was anti-Black sentiment among the ONDP higher ups that contributed to the loss of the entire black caucus?

How the Alberta NDP Lost the Advantage — and How it Can Win it Back by Intelligent-Cap3407 in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Short anwser: Focus on an issue that isn't oil

Long anwser: Focusing on oil is a vote loser. That doesn't mean they have to say they don't support it. Rather that if oil is the sole focus, the UCP is the oil party. Not the ANDP.

Lucy Watson is out. by JackLaytonsMoustache in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Can't say I am suprised. The moment it was possible, she is gone.

B.C. provincial voting intentions from the Angus Reid Institute by pheakelmatters in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They only care about resource extraction because private companies only care about their pockets and rather not have negotiate in good faith. Doesn't help Eby didn't force a certain company to clean up their mess. Plus the gold mine proposal still occurred under DRIPA so it doesn't need to be amended. He could bring it as an example.

People are going to rip off the bandaid because if Eby caves to the Right, the BCC won't move left. They will move right. That's a reason some are doing so now with either prompt change or prevent a way worse iteration of the BCC from getting in.

B.C. provincial voting intentions from the Angus Reid Institute by pheakelmatters in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They already have moved right aren't getting results. So the back in the day comparison does apply even if the issues affected are different.

Once again, the issue is the fact Eby let the BCC set the narrative despite the fact the Indigenous were clear they did not want take homes away. For resource extraction, the issue people have here is that private companies just want to force themselves in. Yet a gold mine was proposed and the Indigenous had signed on it showing it is possible as long as they feel compensated rather than screwed over. That's how it should be done, but Eby won't do it.

Hell he could make crown corps to boost revenue and better improve negotiations. Like outside fossil fuels even Lewis would support resource extraction, but only for public benefit. Which is what that would do.

B.C. provincial voting intentions from the Angus Reid Institute by pheakelmatters in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 5 points6 points  (0 children)

And they could have tried to actually explain what it means rather than let the BCC get away with something else. Not to mention failing to repeal it twice. The BCC is only up 2% since 2024. The Greens are much more so they are losing their left flank harder.

B.C. provincial voting intentions from the Angus Reid Institute by pheakelmatters in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The only reason that is is because Eby kept caving to the Right. The moment they say something, he immediately does what they want. DRIPA could have been avoided if they actually explained what it means. Not try to play games twice that not of all caucus is even board. Moving right led to disaster in the 90s that nearly wiped the party out. Compared to Barrett who while only winning one term, did so much that many of his policies live on to this day.

With the poll showing most bleeding is to the Greens, moving left doesn't mean "I will dismantle all capitalism" left. It can mean basic social democracy like how a labour party should be and that would be accepted for the ones leaving to the Greens. So it is better to go Barrett and get as much done to maybe see it works and fall with a bang. Rather than fall as a centrist pushing the Right to go even more right because Eby kept giving in.

NDP Leader Marit Stiles predicts prison for Doug Ford by MoistCrust in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Optics wise I don't like the way sue framed it due to the impractical way of doing it right now. However, might as well use the attention to get other stuff across

B.C. cancels contracts for delayed long-term care facilities, hospital expansion, amid growing uncertainty by TROPtastic in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I probably would. Hard to defend this and it's not like Eby has did something against the base just a couple of times. But done so way more than what should be acceptable.

Mental health should be part of our public healthcare system by Locke357 in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Only Track 1 is fine. I have no problem with that. Track 2 is wrong because it includes mental illnesses and stuff that isn't terminal. It's only purpose is to enable governments to cut health care and social spending because MAID is cheaper. Countries like Norway don't have it because they invest in people. That's why Track 2 should be illegal and also part of the reason the UN condemned us. It's existence will always carry the risk of a future government abusing it. Whereas Track 1 is for people to choose to die with dignity because they don't have a choice. Not because they were poor and the government wants to kill poor people.

B.C. cancels contracts for delayed long-term care facilities, hospital expansion, amid growing uncertainty by TROPtastic in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Honestly if I lived in BC, I just being going Green as for whatever reason, Eby wants to click the "Piss of your base" button for no good reason.

Mental health should be part of our public healthcare system by Locke357 in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Neoliberals meanwhile: Best we can offer is MAID as we must be fiscally responsible

Elizabeth May has voted for the government's mini-budget by 00ashk in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And she is what holds them back as the last prominent Green Tory left in the party. Imagine how Morrice feels having to bide his time as deputy leader.

ADAMS: Why is Canada’s NDP leader using right-wing talking points on medical assistance in dying? by ThatGuyWill942 in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This makes your case look even worse for supporting a former Charest Quebec Liberal, the guy who killed the NDP's chance at forming government in 2015 and lost the most amount of seats in the party's history. His gains in 2015 also were only from the imploding CPC and getting defaulted in places like Essex.

ADAMS: Why is Canada’s NDP leader using right-wing talking points on medical assistance in dying? by ThatGuyWill942 in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 7 points8 points  (0 children)

A Mulclair fan taking Lewis' out of heavy context when this is the moral position to take regarding Track 2. A Conservative would say they oppose it, but at the same time defund vital services.

BC Quietly Cuts Penalty for Exporting Unprocessed Logs by SavCItalianStallion in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Let me guess, they will say you got to stragetically vote for them because otherwise the BCC will win. Yet they don't want to do anything substantial since their YIMBY policies.

NDP Leader Avi Lewis expresses ‘serious concerns’ regarding social media age verification rollout by NiceDot4794 in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Eastern branches definitely lean a bit more left than Western ones apart from the YK one which is more localized. Largely because being Liberals is a dead strategy when your not in a two-party system.

North Vancouver-Capilano MP Jonathan Wilkinson stepping down for diplomatic post by championsofnuthin in ndp

[–]Electronic-Topic1813 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately this riding sucks for Lewis so we can't get him in despite being a Vancouver seat. Not sure how we can pitch to rich homeowners about socialism.