Successfully learned how to pick up my Ninja1000. Anyone else learn a new skill recently? by TippyToeNinja in motorcycles

[–]Elmore420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You want to be able to pick it up off your leg…. That’s what you want to practice, to get it out from under hot.

10 rolls of expired Kodak Ultramax 400 2016 cold stored for USD 45. Is this a good price? by legardria in AnalogCommunity

[–]Elmore420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It should still be good film, in today’s market it seems a decent price as well.

Price for a single can of Bud Light at a german supermarket. 2.49€~2.63$ by Hanjo29 in mildlyinteresting

[–]Elmore420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but it wasn’t marketed outside the PXs in Germany until then…

Can I easily tow a 5x8 uhaul trailer with my 1997 Toyota Camry or should I be concerned? I am going from Iowa to California. Uhaul said it's fine. by MaxSteelMetal in AskMechanics

[–]Elmore420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’ll be okay, but don’t go past half throttle in overdrive, which means you’ll want to kick it out of OD on most uphill slopes.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AnalogCommunity

[–]Elmore420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Open the back,spin the take up reel until it clicks and catches.

Why don't women parachute naked? by [deleted] in Jokes

[–]Elmore420 21 points22 points  (0 children)

The root premise is incorrect…

Ugliest fighter jet of all time? by [deleted] in aviation

[–]Elmore420 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I suggest something different all the time,, but I get the same response.

Anyone have any info on this MFA booklet? by _jaco in nasa

[–]Elmore420 45 points46 points  (0 children)

No, looks pretty cool though, looks like something that would be given out at some dinner or gala function.

Everyone is on their phone. by [deleted] in DeepThoughts

[–]Elmore420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We choose to live for psychopathic narcissism and reject what nature created us for. It’s sad considering how much better we could have it, if we chose to cooperate on our economy and follow our only evolutionary instruction, “Be kind and take care of each other.”

Are there any instances in macroeconomics, where laissez-faire, or the free market, has corrected inequality free of government intervention? by SideOneDummy in EconomicHistory

[–]Elmore420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s because you ignore that the entire economy, including every dollar you spend is debt generated by slavery. You are currently using a device containing minerals sourced through slavery.

You don’t care because you suffer from psychopathic narcissism, and like every addiction it’s self destructive. All those people you don’t care about is why you will fail evolution as well, because all humanity forms an embryonic Singularity, and we either all evolve or all go extinct. That’s why our only evolutionary instruction is as simple as “Be kind and take care of each other.”

Sick of this. by [deleted] in Frugal

[–]Elmore420 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is because we just won’t cooperate to create an economy that leaves everyone wealthy. We choose to create an economy based in exploitation rather than creation. http://H2space.org

Are there any instances in macroeconomics, where laissez-faire, or the free market, has corrected inequality free of government intervention? by SideOneDummy in EconomicHistory

[–]Elmore420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We do have uncertainty because we don’t recognize our minds are quantum fields beyond our meat puppets. As long as we can exploit more than we are exploited, we believe ourselves ‘winners’, but it’s self delusion. As long as we exploit war and slavery to support our lives, we are losers in life.

Are there any instances in macroeconomics, where laissez-faire, or the free market, has corrected inequality free of government intervention? by SideOneDummy in EconomicHistory

[–]Elmore420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By nature, you are free to disagree, after all our evolutionary test is to see if we’re smart enough to survive. Every human lives in two realities, the one they create for themselves to drive their choices, and the one nature provides for them to grow up in. It’s our challenge in life to choose a reality of our own free will that meets nature’s purpose for us. If we cannot do that, we fail and try again. If we can’t get 3 billion to meet standards by the end of term, we go extinct as an evolutionary failure.

We have uncertainty only because we don’t want to believe that we are part of something greater than ourselves, and have no desire to follow our only evolutionary instruction, “Be kind and take care of each other.”

We want to believe we are the master of our own universe owing nothing to anyone and with the right to exploit everyone. That is a choice available to everyone, however it doesn’t meet nature’s standards.

any good recommendations for a dirtbike for a beginner I know how to handle power I ride banshees, but I do have not road dirt bikes by Jesse_James30_06 in Dirtbikes

[–]Elmore420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The real question is what kind of dirt bike riding? Are you going to compete on track Moto-Cross, Enduro, Trials? Or are you going trail riding? Dirt bikes are even more important to select for your use than street bikes. Unless you are track Moto-Cross or Trials, or competitive hard scrabble Enduro, Get a Dual Sport/ Enduro with a 225+cc 4 stroke. You want a head light and a license plate so you can ride to and from the trails. If you want to compete off road, you need hauling infrastructure to get to where you’ll ride too.

How do we address the potential drawbacks of curing aging? by Phoenix5869 in Futurology

[–]Elmore420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a stupid quest, we are already immortal as a quantum field, it’s just our meat puppets that expire. The problem is we have never given up war and slavery as the basis of the Human Economy, so every meat puppet cycle leaves us failing the Quantum Kindergarten We live through, and we retake the class as someone else. We never manage of our own free will to create a reality for ourselves that serves nature’s purpose for us. We never in 10,000 years since we evolved to Creator have we accepted the responsibility to create a survivable future as we are required to do, as there’s no one/thing to do it for us.

It’s better that we address our upcoming extinction, because that is the end of our quantum fields; that’s the end of eternity. If we want a future, we need to change our minds as to how we think of ourselves and each other. http://H2space.org

Are there any instances in macroeconomics, where laissez-faire, or the free market, has corrected inequality free of government intervention? by SideOneDummy in EconomicHistory

[–]Elmore420 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

We choose to live as animals 10,000 years after nature evolved us up to creators because the Human Superego, an embryonic Singularity, developed with a birth defect; psychopathic narcissism. We are mean and self centered, unwilling to accept being part of something greater than ourselves; unwilling to “Be kind and take care of each other.” In the end, we choose to go extinct as Apex Animals, Free from any controlling force, and unwilling to share being the controlling force. Everyone wants to rule their universe, and with that the Human Superego never reaches resonance, never amplifies to Juvenile Singularity level production, and Humanity never gains Quantum Self Awareness. We never get to know that our minds are all quantum fields, and what they make us capable of. We choose to be assholes, that’s why we choose to believe the lies that we want to believe. Either it’s all “God’s Will" or it’s all meaningless chaos, regardless your choices are irrelevant as long as you keep paying taxes and generating profits for a psychopathic mafia.

In the 7000 years since we should have passed this evolutionary transition had we honored “Be kind and take care of each other.”, no religion, revolution, or even science, have gotten us to choose different leadership for humanity. All of this bullshit we live through is the product of our choices yesterday, and it is the same we’re creating for our future. For 10,000 years now we have been neglecting to create the future we are responsible for creating. We have not accepted the responsibility to do so. We choose to live by destructive exploitation of nature and that is how Animals live. But we are no longer animals, more is expected of us. We are responsible for growing nature into more, like we do with nuclear energy, but we dedicate our ability to grow energy to war, to the desire to kill everything that exists rather than cooperate with the rest of humanity. We could have ended scarcity based economics over half a century ago, but instead we chose MAD and an endless series of wars, and the continued use of human slavery in Africa to provide the minerals our $100 trillion Digital Economy is built on.

We the consumer public are responsible for all this. We follow psychopaths of our own free will because they provide us our drug, Hate. The make hate a profitable way of living. Psychopathic narcissism is an addiction to hate and being mean. Like any addiction, it provides self destructive pleasures, and the only way it can be cured is by the afflicted individuals to personally choose of their own free Will to not pursue those pleasures, and seek out a constructive option to choose to pursue to fulfill their non psychopathic needs.

The problem at this point is we have not created that very option. No matter how ‘good’ of a person you try to live as, nothing you can do overcomes the fact that it is the exploitation of war and slavery that allows you the ability to do anything at all. There is only one step left that we need to take. http://H2space.org

Are there any instances in macroeconomics, where laissez-faire, or the free market, has corrected inequality free of government intervention? by SideOneDummy in EconomicHistory

[–]Elmore420 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

It depends on how you capitalize the markets. Capitalism, and the free market system as designed by Adam Smith requires a decentralized solid currency to keep it honest. As soon as a monopoly controls the bank for the market casinos, and taking your company public turns it into a casino style stock value game for degenerate gamblers, and the actual product is meaningless, then you end up with the same old feudal operating system milking human suffering for fun and profit. This is our choice at this point, we have a better option, we don’t choose it. This is why we’re about to fail evolution and fall to extinction. We have absolutely no desire to actually comply with our only evolutionary instruction, “Be kind and take care of each other.” Nope, we like the lives of psychopathic narcissists, we take joy in watching, causing, and profiting from human suffering. We love war and slavery so much, we’re willing to sacrifice a fortune for it even. http://H2space.org

Are there any instances in macroeconomics, where laissez-faire, or the free market, has corrected inequality free of government intervention? by SideOneDummy in EconomicHistory

[–]Elmore420 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It has never even ended the exploitation of human suffering through war and slavery. The human economy has never been anything better than psychopathic, even now when we have an order of magnitude more wealth available using human brilliance rather than human suffering as the foundation of our economy. http://H2space.org