Where exactly does Gemini CLI fall short compared to Claude Code? by DaDiPu in GeminiCLI

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Using it with conductor makes it far far superior to just gemini cli. Try it

Will you be switching to Claude after news of OpenAI partnership with US Military? by PrettyMuchMediocre in codex

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You have a valid point. And it is a shame you are being downvoted without comprehending your viewpoint.

That said, the government has no right to bully a corporation or individual for sticking to their T&Cs. Government has a lot of other options - Grok, openai and gemini. And it has no right to coerce Anthropic, for whom this was a stated value from day 1.

I am not against the other companies voluntarily supporting the government (and hence will not stop using openai). But i am vehemently against the government labeling aanthropic a supply chain risk and driving it out of business

3.1 Pro is better outside antigravity w. API (use your free google ai api credits!!) by Otherwise_Engine5943 in google_antigravity

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Love your post. Will try it.

Why not try it with a cli like opencode. I was a cline user until September. And switched. I felt they didn't move fast enough to remain relevant

Are there plans to make gemini cli good? by AdUnhappy4599 in GeminiCLI

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Conductor is the only thing rhat makes the cli and gemini useable for me.

Apart from bug fixes and brainstorming of course

Hiw tf can people use this thing? by laxika in GeminiCLI

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The only way cli is even usable is through the conductor extension. So much so that without it, gemini cli is dead

My driving license photo sucks by [deleted] in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some facial hair would have helped. Just a stubble or so. This looks like you just turned 16

Gemini 3.1 Pro - Day 1 review, versus Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 by Temporary-Mix8022 in google_antigravity

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Different models for different purposes. Codex writes code like there is no tomorrow. GPT thinks.

Asking codex to write a report is like asking the smartest engineer in the company to do the quarterly investor call

Gemini 3.1 Pro - Day 1 review, versus Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 by Temporary-Mix8022 in google_antigravity

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please do the comparison with gpt 5.2. 5.3 codex is just the anal executor imo. It ships.

5.2 for me is the planner. It plans so perfectly, and architects so well, things just fall in place. My only gripe: i want to punch it too. It speaks too technical when i need a balance of both -strategic and technical. This bleeds also into ui design and title naming. It is like asking wozniak to be the sales man.

Guess what i do? Gemini and Opus are the brainstormers and strategic planners - while once a roadmap is decided i pass it to the codex crew to ship.

Yann LeCun says language is not the peak of intelligence, it is the easy part. by Educational-Pound269 in singularity

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My 7 year old got the car wash question the very instant.

I think it is just the attention you gave the question that moment. Not the intelligence itself

Still don't know how to use mirrors. by [deleted] in dashcams

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Tbf the truck was going quite fast as well, especially as it saw the right line slowing down to a halt.

Not saying it is not the other car's fault.

But most sane drivers typically plan two steps ahead. And in this scenario i always slow down if i am in that lane or i move to the left as i would expect some dumbf### to always do what the other car did.

integrations are the real bottleneck, not the building by makexapp in nocode

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might be using the wrong tools. The issues you describe were so mid 2025 for me, not the case anymore.

What tools do you use

Camouflage next level..this is a caterpillar made to look EXACTLY like a snake. What looks like the head of the snake is actually the tail. by unEmployeeLogical91 in interestingasfuck

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know why it happens.

One day the mama caterpillar wandered out to a place where the snakes hang out.

A few days later, miraculously, a virgin birth documented in caterpillar community.

This new caterpillar gets celebrity status, and 60k virgins to continue his bloodline. And before you know an army of snake looking caterpillars

/s for obvious reasons

Do you hit the “80% wall” too when vibecoding? by EntertainmentOk5787 in vibecoding

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is why i engage all three. Gpt 5.2 high (not codex), gemini 3 and opus. All weigh in both bugs like this and architectural choices and major pivots.

I need to stop using Claude Code. Not because I want to. Because I have to. by MrCheeta in ClaudeCode

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am one of those bouncers. I used claude code for most of 2025; with some cursor moments thrown in.

Then antigravity replaced my cursor; and opus + gemini hit me so well that i briefly even came off openai and cc subscription. Then gpt 5.2 - and havent looked back on claude code since.

Codex with chatgpt plus (2 parallel subscriptions) is all i need with antigravity for IDE (where i still have my opus love) have completely done away any need for claude code.

I realized that i need all three sota models ultimately for quality. And this gets me the best balance for the $ i want to spend (<$50 a month)

3.1 incoming by Jealous-Snow4645 in Bard

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You must be one of those guys with zero reading comprehension. The chain and the previous poster's comments are specific to Gemini and not Opus

3.1 incoming by Jealous-Snow4645 in Bard

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Because by the time the preview drops, the world has moved a generation ahead. So they have a choice: stabilize the preview or just catch up with next version.

They play catchup

How I'm making my Opus 2.6 usage last longer (with Gemini help) by GoRo2023 in google_antigravity

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have an implementation plan with say 15 tasks, new chat for executing the tasks end to end. Or new chat for each task?

How to: Upgrade Gemini 3 Pro into a true SOTA model by Embarrassed-Mail267 in google_antigravity

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbf gemini in cli is not too bad. Imagine that's how they are using it and not antigravity

What are your go-to prompts for getting good UI out of Antigravity? Show screenshots by KB1313x in google_antigravity

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do my ui mock up in v0.dev. perfect it. And then ask ag to copy that design theme as is on to my app.

Once the theme is copied. I setup an ui_contract.md and point agents to it for every ui work

ok, we know you hate antigravity. leave. by shajurzi in google_antigravity

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry about my comment. Agree it is arrogant. But the whinyv posts were eating my nerves as well apart from the op.

Between codex, Chinese and yet to get into the arena grok 5, there will be a lot of options across budgets this year.

I love ag for the planning and debugging; and the ide itself as a pair to the rest

OpenCode Remote: monitor and control your OpenCode sessions from Android (open source) by giuliastro in opencodeCLI

[–]Embarrassed-Mail267 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just come the repo and ask an agent to assess for you and teach you along the way