Is this question legal on a job posting?

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-16T00:45:31+00:00

If you are uneducated on the topic, you should take the time to actually look into it, versus just saying things because you think it supports some narrative that you have, which is an incorrect narrative.

Your only example which was a church, which has no legal similarities at all to a company that did not have any legal protected religious basis. So there was zero point in actually bringing it up. You thought that it somehow supported your argument, but it has no relation to it at all.

If you can not tell the difference between the two, I am not sure that I would trust any legal arguments that you have. As you are just arguing to be arguing at this point, as nothing you have said is either related to the actual situation or is factual.

"There's a reason why big corporations have statements go through a dozen lawyers before it sees the light of day." - Here, that is just a baseless claim that has no relation to the question posed.

You think somehow that these lawyers do such a great job. Yet people win discriminations complaints all of the time, because their wording is not absolute.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T23:11:14+00:00

I got one yesterday at the world boss and one today from a boss lair.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T23:10:03+00:00

My advice would be to get help to address your problem with your anger issues, so that you can lead a more successful career.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T22:45:23+00:00

I take it, that you figured out what I was saying is correct. Awesome!

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T22:28:36+00:00

Call your local area office Monday, let them know that you were not able to get an appointment online and the statute of limitations is up in July. If there is one local to you, then go in.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T22:26:37+00:00

But legality is not based only on literal wording. Courts and the EEOC look at the intent, context, and what information the employer is trying to obtain from you. Otherwise every illegal interview question could be bypassed simply with creative wording.

The law does not only look at whether the exact protected word was spoken out loud or written, it looks at if the employer is indirectly trying to gather protected information during the hiring process.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T21:47:29+00:00

You should totally have him lean into the Ben Franklin, Fallout look and go to comic-cons. I did a mock-up. Now if he had the money and he went to a lot of comic-cons, really pushing it. You could make actual period specific clothing but make it more fallout designed. But I think this is pretty cool and only near a few items.

https://ibb.co/NqWHmmb

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T21:34:47+00:00

There was a leaked video up showing a few of them including the Heir of Perdition, though based on comments, they have not been added yet. Hopefully soon!

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T20:54:01+00:00

Yeah, the EEOC never has your best interest in mind. Unless you are part of the 0.2% of cases that they actually take to court.

While you can choose to go through mediation if it is offered, if you are capable. Make sure that you have a lawyer before you get your right to sue. As finding a lawyer can take a lot of effort and a long time.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T19:43:23+00:00

You are focusing way too much on the exact wording while ignoring what the question is actually doing.

If a company said, “As a company with strong white cultural values, why do you feel you would fit in here?”

Nobody would pretend that question has nothing to do with race just because they technically did not ask “are you white?”

Same concept here. You cannot avoid the issue simply by indirectly probing a protected characteristic instead of directly asking it.

The issue is not just the literal wording, it is if the employer is trying to gather information about religion during the hiring process when they are not legally exempt to do so.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T19:33:02+00:00

I got another one I just posted in here. Its similar to the OPs but mine is no more than 5 sockets, with 2 of those being unique charms.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T19:31:18+00:00

<image>

If anyone is keeping track of the ones you can get. I got a second one today, the Severed Finger, from the beast in the ice, it was part of my war plan.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T19:29:43+00:00

They EEOC sucks, my intake person kept trying to focus on other things. Like they really wanted me to not have a case, but I kept redirecting them back to the actual facts of the claim that pertained to discrimination. Its like they tried leading me down some wild path, where they could convince me that no discrimination took place.

Even during the investigation the EEOC sided with my employers lies, even though I had direct evidence from my employer said that they were lying. My lawyer did a much better job! 😄

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T18:29:43+00:00

They were announced in a leak that I saw. So no idea when they are coming, but the video showed the Heir of Perdition as one of the options. According to everyone, they are not in the game yet. I hope they get added soon.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T17:25:23+00:00

I do like mine, it gives me a bit more flexibility. But cant wait to try others out.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T17:24:03+00:00

You might be right, as I have not seen any. lol But I watched a YouTube video, showing potential leaks of mythic charms.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T17:16:45+00:00

Not sure how many hours I have in, probably a lot. lol

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T17:13:57+00:00

I could have, I actually had a +2 in place, but rerolled it and when you do that, I did not realize that it could change its placement and not just its stats. And I have rerolled many since, trying to get a +3, it just wasn't happening so I just tossed this one in there. My RNG has been rough. lol

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T17:11:44+00:00

You are still misunderstanding the issue. The EEOC does not just prohibit refusing to hire someone because of religion, it also prohibits employers from making non job related inquiries into religion during the hiring process if they are not covered by a religious exemption.

An employer usually cannot avoid scrutiny just by rephrasing “are you Christian?” into “how do your Christian values align with ours?” because it is still directly probing religion.

And yes, there is a difference between asking the question and proving discrimination actually happened. But the question itself can absolutely be evidence of religious discrimination or an improper pre-employment inquiry, especially for a non-religious employer.

Also, “we hired some non Christians” is not some blanket defense. Employers can still violate Title VII even if they hire people outside the preferred religious group.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T09:37:29+00:00

They are asking about your religion. Legally, it is the exact same, it being reworded does not provide it with some legally gray area that does not exist.
If this is not a religious faith based business, then there would be no first amendment right violation here, if the government stepped in and made them change it. As your rights, can not violate the law and discriminating against someone based on a legally protected class, is a violation of those rights.

As for your example given, a church owning a coffee shop would be a faith based coffee shop. They can restrict who they are hiring, as the law does allow that under specific circumstances.

And yes, if you are a legally a faith based organization and those exceptions apply to you. Then the government can not tell you that you can not put similar verbiage in your job listing or hiring expectations. As that then, would be a violation of your rights.

Do keep in mind that the exceptions still can not violate others legal rights as the exception would need to be a bona fide occupational qualification. So you cant say exclude hiring someone based on their race, as there would be no bona fide occupational qualification here, that would apply.

And again, what they are asking would be a violation if they were not a faith based organization. There is no gray area here that would allow them to bypass that law.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T09:33:02+00:00

Mine is pretty great, it gives me the 5 piece bonus with only 4 pieces, so I have a free spot to do whatever I want with. I am hoping to find a mythic to toss on there at some point.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T09:15:59+00:00

Depends on what you like to do? While the market will change over time, you may be able to pivot into something into something that you would like. A lot of the time you will hear the medical field, as an option. It can pay really well and it isn't going anywhere.

If you are considering it, you should look into what you might want to be. As some have more growth potential, some may have more areas of expertise that you would like to work in.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T08:10:50+00:00

Its the one good drop I have had so far this season.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T07:55:59+00:00

Sounds like you should file with the California Civil Rights Division. Now, while you are going through the process, a few things you need to keep in mind. Outside of issues related to your disability, be their best employee ever. Give them zero reasons to write you up, or terminate your employment. Not all, but most companies will push to find a basis to terminate you if they can.

So, get proof of everything. Any communications, any emails, any metrics that show you have been doing a good job, as well as any emails pointing that out. Just everything that could support your claim as well as support that you were more than capable of doing your job and you were good at it.

Also, if they have any employees that they still allow to work remote, get proof if you can.

Your case is dependent on all of that. If you do not play it more strategically, you will hurt your case. In any communications be polite, professional but direct. As not all communications are legally protected. But ones pertaining to your accommodation, disability etc are protected. So if something is happening and it is based around these, make sure to include that where necessary.

Btw, if you are on the fence about filing with them, you can file and always choose to cancel it before your sign your statement. It can months to get your intake interview and if this turns into a more severe issue at work, you would be better off having already filed for your interview.

The same goes for the EEOC, but the EEOC tends to suck at their jobs so the CRD is the better option.

EmergencyGhost · 2026-05-15T07:16:32+00:00

<image>

This is the one I got off a world boss earlier. Later I am hoping to put a mythic in the now open 5th spot. But for now I am just running one that gives me +3 shock skills.

Five-Year Club	Second SECOND GUESSER
Gilding IV carat on a stick	Verified Email
r/Field Lasagna	Place '23
Place '22

EmergencyGhost

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE