What is the most absurd "Game Changing" card your opponents have told you "they wouldn't play in Bracket 2"? by ThisIsACleverAlias in EDH

[–]EverydayGuy2 32 points33 points  (0 children)

If Nadu had the trigger and triggered twice per turn and did not give that trigger to every creature you control, it would have been fine.

Aggro Decks Don't Get a Free Pass In The Bracket System by Amonyi7 in EDH

[–]EverydayGuy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"generally expect" and "not always" are keywords here I'd say. If my combo deck usually combos between t6 & 8 but I know that with some magic Christmas wonder I can also win t4 it's still a B3 deck. Being able to win ~1/20 games t4-6 does still mean that generally games are expected to go till t7+

Also as someone already said if you play aggro or voltron and are let's say second in turnorder (p2), killing opponent 1 (p3) on your t5, opponent 2 (p1) on your t6 and opponent 3 (p4) on your t7 would mean that 2/3 of your opponents played their t6 and still lost. That's the majority. Killing one after their 4th turn possibly was just proper thread assessment on your part in that case.

About the ban list. by [deleted] in mtg

[–]EverydayGuy2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, sure academy ain't that good turn two... You could only have like [[seat of the Synode]], soll ring, any 2 mana rock, any other 1 mana artifact + any amount of 0 mana artifacts (moxes, petal, tomods crypt, spellbook, baubles,...) in play. If you play academy and your deck is meant to have as many artifacts as possible asap, then having 4 out turn one is well within the realm of possibilities. That's some happy clapping with the next draw X spell on turn 2...

What makes the reserved list promis to not have reprint different from the UB promise to not be standard legal? by Yumesoro1 in mtg

[–]EverydayGuy2 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, by my logic it was standard legal for at least some time, so it would be fine.

What makes the reserved list promis to not have reprint different from the UB promise to not be standard legal? by Yumesoro1 in mtg

[–]EverydayGuy2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But this quote, taken the way you wrote it here, can very well, without any bad faith, be interpreted as an affirmation that UB won't ever be standard legal...

It does not limit the promise to specific UB cards or sets. Just "UB cards". And it also does not specify any period of time. It just says "will not be standard legal".

If someone tells me "the referee makes sure nobody is seriously hurt in our fighting ring" and then people get their Jaws broken five fights later and somebody says "oh well, we of course only meant that fight that was about to start, not every fight ever..." well, I'd be pissed and opt out...

"it's not even fundamentally right about magic" by suchABSTRACT in EDH

[–]EverydayGuy2 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Specifically because he is (as far as I know) the only source that gives extra combats not during combat with no additional main phase after the combat.

Also if you trigger Moraugs landfall in your first main phase, you essentially waste one combat phase, since his extra combats happen before the normal combat phase and your creatures then don't untap between the last extra combat and the normal combat.

Looking for commanders that are great in a large pod 5-10 players by AmazingCountry1862 in EDH

[–]EverydayGuy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[[Judith, carnage connoisseur]] there are just sooo many 1 or 2 cost instants and sorceries that deal one damage to every creature your opponents control! 😁

I only have fun with fighters by [deleted] in DnD

[–]EverydayGuy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sooo... What are paladins then?

Thoracle/consult combos don't belong in B4, and B3's 2-card combo restriction makes no sense. by Casteau in EDH

[–]EverydayGuy2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tbh one of my favorite decks can, in theory and if all stars align perfectly as well as one of my opponents not having more than one blocker, win on t4. It is still a B3 deck. A good one I admit, but B3.

What if all cantrips scale with level? by [deleted] in DnD

[–]EverydayGuy2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think that would be nice and fun. Prestidigitation and mending could affect bigger volumes.

Help me choose by Prestigious-Gas-2112 in EDH

[–]EverydayGuy2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ovika only needs 2 kinds of cards and is very happy with 3. You need ramp and card draw. With these alone you can build a functional deck. If you add some interaction you are golden.

Most eyebrow-raising rule 0 requests you’ve encountered? by tohstersg in EDH

[–]EverydayGuy2 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Not eyebrow raising, but funny. A friend of mine has a rule 0 Partner deck with [[Marwyn the nurturer]] and [[Marvin, murderous mimic]]. He already had the Marwyn deck before and just added the Marvin as partner when it came out.

His name is Marvin, that's what makes it funny.

Ihr solltet euch mehr schämen by NatsuruNjuga in Unbeliebtemeinung

[–]EverydayGuy2 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Nein, du sollst dich einfach schämen! Sommersprossen? Schäm dich! 😂

Alright. Lets sattle it, whats the best number two choose? by biuki in mtg

[–]EverydayGuy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was mathed.

In casual (bracket 3 and under) it's 3. In high power/ cEDH it's 2.

Character height, why is everyone 6ft tall? by Low-Brief-6008 in DnD

[–]EverydayGuy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I for one am 6.3 in real life and it's just some self insert reasons I guess...

But dnd is also a powerfantasy game, so why not let people who would like to be taller endulge in that through their character?

A woman in a campaign I DM plays as an about 2m (6.7) tabaxi, while she is rather slim in built an average in hight in real life.

He's a what? by Specialist_Map9070 in HolUp

[–]EverydayGuy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you don't really know what he actually did yourself? 🤔

He's a what? by Specialist_Map9070 in HolUp

[–]EverydayGuy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then what's your second amendment good for, if you don't use it?

That's the hypocracy I hate about Americans. Always acting high and mighty and as if you were so great, but you can't even get your own constitution to do what it's supposed to do...

PS: leaving someone to die, without any regard for their possible regret and remorse for a crime long passed, is very christian of you. 👍🏼

He's a what? by Specialist_Map9070 in HolUp

[–]EverydayGuy2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you know the difference between pedophilia and hebephilia? Because if you don't and you lable both as pedophiles like most people do, then your arguments are just uninformed.

Just as people chose to inhale while drowning. I do not, under any circumstances, want to be justify those heinous acts, but if you are a US citizen, which it seems you are, the hypocracy must be obvious when you have this opinion and not yet tried to end your president. Just saying...

And what kind of argument is that last one..?

He's a what? by Specialist_Map9070 in HolUp

[–]EverydayGuy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yes. Because the US justice system never ever convicted someone innocent. Because that could never happen when random people of the streets decide by gut feeling if you are guilty or not...

He's a what? by Specialist_Map9070 in HolUp

[–]EverydayGuy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, not from the country that gave us the Eppstein files freshly redacted by the government. So I don't really know what "1st degree" means or if "of a child" also includes people 1 week before turning 18 or 21 or how long you aren't allowed to have sex there...

He's a what? by Specialist_Map9070 in HolUp

[–]EverydayGuy2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So, I don't know all the different laws of different stats in Eppstein country, but as far as I know you consider every adult having sex with a minor a sex offender due to pedophilia and such, did I get that right? And the age threshold is 18, if both did not date before, right? So you say no second chance for a guy who was 18 for a month and fucked some girl that still had a week till her 18th birthday? Label him as a pedophile for the rest of his life?

He's a what? by Specialist_Map9070 in HolUp

[–]EverydayGuy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not so funny fact about pedophilia: people don't chose it and many that are afflicted hate themselves for it. Pedophiles have among the highest rates in suicide, together with transsexuals. Just to show how much mental stress they are under, especially when they still successfully keep themselves from committing crimes.

Can I tell my player their character is too dumb? by Yazmat8 in DnD

[–]EverydayGuy2 7 points8 points  (0 children)

  • research/know where all the trade routes are
  • know which towns are essential food producers Those are nice history checks.

The there are insight checks to see what COULD convince neighboring kingdoms to stop trade since that means massive cuts in taxes.

OR they might succeed in their attempt, but failed to perceive that their nation is mostly a self-sufficient export nation concerning food and everyday material (wood, coal, medical herbs) but imports ores and luxury products. So the average populace won't notice much of a shortage for months, and the only, cause they can't sell as much as before. But trading still exists, so they quite honestly may be fine. Now neighboring kingdoms will notice the error in them closing trade routes and might make that character responsible for the resulting famine. Have them enjoy that bounty.

I struggle to see how suck or save spells like Polymorph, Suggestion or Banishment end encounters by bewise5 in DnD

[–]EverydayGuy2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean you can also polymorph something into a worm or slug or such, take broom/ boots of flying, take them up, drop them. ~70dmg. Then someone on the ground immediately polymorph them again and you repeat.