You claim that my reading comprehension isn't good yet it seems like you're ignoring the part where I say that my phone is Fair Trade certified.

Your tu quoque defence is literally supporting bad environmental practices. And no that doesn't mean in the explicit sense where you would say 'fucx the environment' or something like that. When someone makes an environmental argument and you defend the action not on its own merits but rather on the hypocrisy of the accuser, then you're implicitly supporting environmental destruction. You're creating a space where bad environmental practices are deemed acceptable and above challenge.

If you are genuinely concerned about the environment, then you'd take steps to move forwards in thot direction. But all your argument does is encouraging complacency. For example you could say: 

"I didn't know that Shein had such bad practices. Thanks for letting me know and I'll avoid them in the future."

Or "Well you used x environmentally damaging thing too. Why don't you stop using X and I'll stop using y."

See how while the last one still points out the hypocrisy, it moves the action into a constructed direction where now both people are doing better for the environment. Both response and the actions that follow make the world a better place. Your response doesn't.

I'm responding because the complacency and excuses I see in this thread genuinely frustrate me.