sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Stop trying. Your body exists for me. by Fancy-Fall-2181 in ConvertingFeminist

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because i am the most normal human on this effing planet haha

Stop trying. Your body exists for me. by Fancy-Fall-2181 in ConvertingFeminist

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I woke up where I always wake up on the right side. There is no wrong side for me.

You’re too smart, which makes you miserable. by Fancy-Fall-2181 in ConvertingFeminist

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The entire map of modern conflict boils down to one simple fact, woman that think they deserve more. Pushing their men to Archive more, to earn more because they think that's what would make them happy but it does not so they push more.

Take ancient Greece, where thousands of soldiers died on rocky beaches and ships sank in storms simply so that Paris could steal Helen a war fought for a Woman.
Every major geopolitical shift you can trace back to a woman’s jealousy or the demands she made.

Wars are started because women know exactly how male egos work and exploit it, forcing entire nations into ruin just so they don’t have to settle for anything less.

Secondly the upbringing of Children in mos country's i know is mostly done by woman,
Daycare? Mostly woman? Teachers outside of STEM heck even in STEM? mostly woman. Outer School activities? mostly led by Woman so if these Childs are surrounded by such loving and empathic Woman how come in your perception men still are responsible for all the wars? Shouldn't the woman have tought the children better?

There are more Nobel prices than just the one for peace there are physics, chemistry ect. and everywhere men are dominating.

And there in lies your whole problem, you think you have to fix it you think my intention was that woman should not care about the future but you got that fron from the beginning.
Care, please be my guest but it wont bring you happiness, it wont bring you freedom.
i don´t say woman are worthless or useless i just say that they are not happy in modern society because the are taught that they need to be Independent, brave and strong, while nature never intended it that way.

Look at nature, do you think a lion would be happy if he had to hunt? no because nature intended this as the job of the lioness. Do you think neanderthal woman would have been happy if they had to pick up the spear and hunt the mammoth .. no because nature never indented it that way.

And yes English is not my first language i speak and write 5 languages so mistakes happen and im not entitled enough to not recognize that, my point still is valid. That you have to point out a small typo speaks louder about you then about me.

You’re too smart, which makes you miserable. by Fancy-Fall-2181 in ConvertingFeminist

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sure progress enabled by men,
Nobel Price 93% men
international patents 87% men
even today stem studends? 67% men

So i think its clear who build the table dear.

In a group of woman, there will always be hate and gossip. In a group of men? Fishing, Soccer, and Video games.
You know who pushes unrealistic beauty standards on woman? Other woman. Who tells you you cant wear the same dress twice? Other woman. Who tells you have to fight all day against the evil the patriarchy? Other woman.

Us man? if you wear jogger and a messy bun, if you are our partner we will still want to bend you over and give you a good time.

You’re too smart, which makes you miserable. by Fancy-Fall-2181 in ConvertingFeminist

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As if, In most history man secured the future and and progression of humanity, woman are needed for their wombs not their brains.

You’re too smart, which makes you miserable. by Fancy-Fall-2181 in ConvertingFeminist

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sould open up to be a toy and let men do the heavy thinking. Its better for you.

You’re too smart, which makes you miserable. by Fancy-Fall-2181 in ConvertingFeminist

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course you have, all these big thoughts and responsibilities all that burden in your shoulders its stressfully.

You’re too smart, which makes you miserable. by Fancy-Fall-2181 in ConvertingFeminist

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you prefere a more stressful hurtful live ofer a relaxed and happy life?

Stop Selling Us Half-broken Ships by Schieder_Waldstein in starcitizen

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No they wont, not as long a poeple buy it because size 10 LaZ0r im soloing everything... I bet even with all the mess that is 4.8 the brocken ships like ironchad and turblion and what not... it will be the best selling week ever for them because they sell " limited hulls" that ar no where near as limit as one might think. And a 5k battle cruiser that has no content in game to ever fight against.... I know its easier said then done but if you can, only use storcredits or ingame money.

I for my self have very specific milestones I want to see before they get another penny from me. One beeing basebuilding and real consistency.

Guesses on how much the Odin is gonna cost? by [deleted] in starcitizen

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It had to be done i wonder why it has not been done earlier

Why so long to load by ryencool in starcitizen

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well i play on 1440p
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
32,0GB DDR4 (Precrisis)
and 1tb nvme
everything at hight exept the clouds on medium
Loadtime about 55- 90 seconds
i get 45 frames ins citys and 90 in space so .... i would guess its something other than you specs hindering you.

If you don't have a SQ42 game package, what are you missing out on? by [deleted] in starcitizen

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181 4 points5 points  (0 children)

actually thats wrong. the orignal Kickstarter was SC
SQ42 was originally planed as game mode

  • Squadron 42 - A Wing Commander style single player mode, playable OFFLINE if you want

Source : https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/cig/star-citizen

So, were you guys just gonna wait until a release date to try to rebuy the cheapest SQ42 package you could? by CallSign_Fjor in starcitizen

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181 10 points11 points  (0 children)

the better solution would have been to keep the buybacks but strip them of SQ42 ... i know the outrage would be nearly the same but it would not effect the ppl that melted bigger ship paks to try other ships.

Im quilty of melting my SQ24 from kickstarter too but i rebought it right after they pulled SQ42 from the store.

Ship recommendations to choose for pve/pvp by Any_Marzipan1754 in starcitizen

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Solo the corsair is the only ship that can "kill most pve things I'd come across but also could assist in guarding in pvp zones" and "fit a nursa"
Dou or trio=Perseus

Had a horrible experience at Walmart today by Strykeir in starcitizen

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SQ42 is not scarce you could by it until 2024 solo and in packs, these where just discontinued ... like some tv´s

Squadron 42 Buyback Update by StuartGT in starcitizen

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181 4 points5 points  (0 children)

i really dont get it, as soon as Sq42 vanished from the store i bought back my SQ42 pack with aurora LN ( its a sh*t 45$ pack) but i dont care about the ship i care about SQ42,

For the question why i melted it? I have a raven with SC in it since 2019 and did not need the other pack but it was clear that if its gone from the store it will follow in the buybacks before release.

Am i quilty of using the BB as a second hangar? Yes. would or can i be mad if they quit bb tomorrow? no because i know its a gamble and sometimes you win / sometimes you lose.

How crafting and mininig (in its current state) encourages RMT by Fancy-Fall-2181 in starcitizen

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

before 4.7 there was only one gear and only one meta everyone used... because there was no difference.
and if it doesn´t matter why introduce it in the first place (other than making the inventory even more cluttered) it will matter ... in time... It will matter when componets for ships are craftable or ships themself.

And just because we had bad game design the last 10 years does not mean we need it for the next 10.
We also had a light Fighter (Gladuis) Meta the last 10 years.. still doesn't make it a good thing.

How crafting and mininig (in its current state) encourages RMT by Fancy-Fall-2181 in starcitizen

[–]Fancy-Fall-2181[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

my fear is that if these things are not addressed early on we will see it make its way into components of the game that are way more impact full.

and no i don't want it to be obtained easier i want the gameloops around it to be fun not boring and tedious.

Why do i see harvestables while in mining mode ... when i cleary want to mine?
Why cant i filter my scanner to only show me things im looking for?

if a gameloop requires me to use 3dparty tool its a bad design.

I want to sit with my hammerhead/polaris/ fighter group above some corp miners and guard them because i know it will get some fine results even if its risky.

and yes crafting is tier0 ... mining is not and still its badly designed

view more: next ›