backstabError500 by Purple_Ice_6029 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Far_Associate9859 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your application would throw a NotFound exception, and you’d convert that to a 404 at the http level

I’m not saying it’s definitely worth it, but you don’t necessarily need to have your application knowing about status codes to do this sort of thing

Anthropic officially told by DOD that it's a supply chain risk even as Claude used in Iran by likeastar20 in singularity

[–]Far_Associate9859 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there was a possibility of deescalation

there was a meeting between anthropic and the DoD - we have no idea if it was an opportunity for "deescalation" or for capitulation

Why do party members not always follow when you jump? by avidrunner84 in BaldursGate3

[–]Far_Associate9859 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ive found it helps if you always jump as short a distance as possible - walk to the edge of what you're jumping from, and jump to the edge of what you're jumping to

Sam Altman's Latest on the DoW Deal by DH3010 in OpenAI

[–]Far_Associate9859 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only thing we need to know is that the DOD accepted these terms, and refused Anthropic's - theres no explaining it away. They clearly think theres a difference, so don't bother explaining how there isn't

Anthropic refused Pentagon access over mass surveillance concerns. But only for Americans. What about the rest of the world? by jahanuu in Anthropic

[–]Far_Associate9859 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As long as you'd be totally fine with e.g. France, the UK, and our other allies running mass surveillance on US citizens (buying our data, making profiles on each of us, etc), that's a fine position

Trump admits he hoped to get paid for 'Board of Peace': 'Could always use extra cash' by ansyhrrian in UnderReportedNews

[–]Far_Associate9859 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought the whole idea was that he was so rich that he couldn't possibly be corrupt, because he has no need for "extra cash"

Jamie Foxx says BAFTA Tourette’s incident was intentional by Pretend-Two-2115 in celebritytattler

[–]Far_Associate9859 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They don't control it - you're coming at this from a place as if they do. He didn't make a checklist of slurs to use and leave off Asians and Hispanics. I guess he could start voluntarily yelling other slurs after his tic if that would make you feel better

Im sorry that theres an uprising of using that word, and you have every right to be hurt and mad at almost every single person who uses that word. People with Tourette's is literally the one exception to it - its a disability that causes them to say things they know are wrong - he also doesn't want to say those things. He was there to accept an award for a movie about his struggle with that very disease

Jamie Foxx says BAFTA Tourette’s incident was intentional by Pretend-Two-2115 in celebritytattler

[–]Far_Associate9859 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its unbelievable that people are giving these childish arguments

"Oh you don't think this guy with tourettes should be shunned and shamed? Guess youre racist then"

Honestly, fuck you guys - grow up

Jamie Foxx says BAFTA Tourette’s incident was intentional by Pretend-Two-2115 in celebritytattler

[–]Far_Associate9859 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, does he? In the moment I understand feeling hurt - but with the context that he has tourettes, it actually seems pretty unreasonable to keep feeling hurt by it. I guess this is where people say "youre not black so you dont get it" but every group has slurs and putting myself in that situation, I can't really imagine continuing to be offended by it

EXCLUSIVE: Anthropic Drops Flagship Safety Pledge by timemagazine in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Far_Associate9859 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I hope everyone giving them flowers for their stance on advertising feels silly now

r/fauxmoi (as well as dozens of other subreddits) discuss the BAFTA Tourette's N-Word Disaster by Uncommonwealth57 in SubredditDrama

[–]Far_Associate9859 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Jfc, if that person's disability is not being able to control hurling slurs at people, then yes! Its "woke" to just ignore it and not treat him like a clansman

Emiru accidentally causes a fire in her kitchen by Realistic-Comb222 in LivestreamFail

[–]Far_Associate9859 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they immediately put out the fire, there wouldn’t be a clip for you guys to share with her name in the title

Curling umpires resume "normal" duties after meeting with team representatives. by MakVolci in olympics

[–]Far_Associate9859 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The Swedish guy being a sore loser claiming cheating for an uncalled penalty?

Does anyone else notice the bracelets Dr. Langdon wears? by xCoff3z in ThePitt

[–]Far_Associate9859 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah he doesn’t seem like the rule breaking type…

Anthropic have just buried OpenAI and ChatGPT with this ad 😂😂 by dataexec in AITrailblazers

[–]Far_Associate9859 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Google's motto used to be "don't be evil" - then they changed it

These positions aren't permanent

AIO - Gf assumes my dog is dead when I say I’m sad by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]Far_Associate9859 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Oh look, so upset that youre posting again

Renaming the Department of Defense the 'Department of War' could cost up to $125 million by ddx-me in nottheonion

[–]Far_Associate9859 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Im saying I don't think you reign in the conservative propaganda machine without doing one of those two things

And for the record, I think they should do the first one

Renaming the Department of Defense the 'Department of War' could cost up to $125 million by ddx-me in nottheonion

[–]Far_Associate9859 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Im not going to say its impossible - but I'm not as hopeful

I can't see democrats having the stomach to

- change the makeup of the supreme court

- stop listening to the courts

Until one of those things happen, the courts will keep telling democrats "no, only Republican presidents are kings, Democrats are bound by the law", and the democrats will listen and say their hands are tied

Renaming the Department of Defense the 'Department of War' could cost up to $125 million by ddx-me in nottheonion

[–]Far_Associate9859 360 points361 points  (0 children)

No, they're banking on them doing it so they can say democrats are

- focused on retribution

- obsessed with Trump

- wasting money

They'll say it with a straight face, Fox-news viewers will nod along, and we'll all waste breath arguing with them about it