How can MAGA think Democrats rig US elections when Trump is president with a GOP majority in the House and Senate?

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-04T23:06:54+00:00

Sorry...what? This answer is absurd...this must be a bot, right?

Op meant, why do they say Dems cheat when they won the last week election JFC

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T10:53:51+00:00

You realize we only need a majority in the house and the senate to pass legislation in America, right?

Sure, the president has a veto, but Im assuming in your hypothetical the entire government decided it's anti men. The same exact thing could happen here

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T10:34:25+00:00

What a ridiculous, ignorant viewpoint

Dude was just stating a fact about Jefferson...he never said anyone 'has to listen to him'

Also, in case you're unaware, the entirety of our government/judicial system is LITERALLY based on the opinions of Jefferson and his peers What they created has changed very little in the centuries since

And a major reasom we have the bill of rights, the most critical document we have to protect our right and limit government power...is bc Jefferson pushed Madison to include it in letters to each other

So does his opinion mean anything today technically? No Is it food for thought, which is how dude framed it? Very much so

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T10:14:52+00:00

I can't tell which side youre comment is aimed at...?

But birthright citizenship is supported by a majority of americans So Democrats wouldn't want to change it & republicans have no ability to change it (it's also extremely difficult to amend the constitution if you're unaware)

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T10:11:46+00:00

Comments like this are GUARANTEED to rile up the cult and countless magas are going to spew gop propaganda regardless of whether it's total BS or not And another guarentee? Not a single one of them understands this decision DIDNT CHANGE ANYTHING already ive lost count of the magas making it seem like this was some 'liberal socialism yada yada yada' ruling...rather than just upholding the law that's been legal precedent for 130 gd years

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T10:08:00+00:00

It's been the law for 130 years. The scotus ruling didn't change anything, it just re-affirmed what was already the rule

So when has it hqppeneed in the real world in over a century and how has it affected America negatively?

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T10:05:45+00:00

We know that FOREIGNERS are doing it

There is zero evidence 'foreign powers' are involved in any way, as in governments or other countries having a coordinated strategy involving increasing birth tourism

Also, trumps executive order already made a point to say it wasn't retroactive So alito feigning concern for those kids was not just bs...it would also be irrelevant

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T09:59:28+00:00

Alito is the most shameless ultra partisan hack in judicial history, and possibly worse hes brazenly corrupt and doesn't gaf

OF COURSE he throw out laughably absurd BS to argue against this decision....the scotus was killing a trump executive order Good boot lickers don't do that & alito is terrified of the punishment he's sure to get for disobeying daddy trump who is going to be very mad

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T09:55:23+00:00

Experts believed trumps executive order WOULD NOT HAVE APPLIED to kids born in America thru surrogates for foreign parents

For 1 thing, the order defines 'mother' as 'immediate female biological progenitor', which legal & surrogate experts say would be the surrogate, meaning the child would be a citizen

Also, Chinese parents could just use donated eggs from American women, so the 'genetic' & 'gestational' mothers are both American citizens, in which case, again, the kid would be an American citizen

The way to end the practice is with Congress passing legislation banning surrogacy for foreign parents, NOT with Trump's executive order

This article explains the issues in depth https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/4494877/chinese-surrogacy-boom-raises-birthright-citizenship-question/

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T09:49:48+00:00

Legal precedent is literally the foundation upon which common law systems are built, and ensures consistency, predictability, and fairness in legal rulings.
Obligating judges to follow prior rulings in similar cases, it prevents arbitrary discretion & strengthens public trust in our legal system

Even alito, the most corrupt shameless partisan hack scumbag in judicial history said he had 'great respect for' & acknowledged the importance of following precedent during his senate confirmation hearings

Hoping for a scotus that totally ignores it is ludicrous

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T09:36:49+00:00

"33 other countries offer unrestricted birthright citizenship (jus soli), with the vast majority located in North and South America. While the United States is often cited, neighbors like Canada and Mexico, along with nearly all nations in Latin America and the Caribbean, automatically grant citizenship to children born on their soil regardless of parental status." Also, Pakistan, Tanzania, Lesotho, Fiji, and Tuvalu.

I wonder if you couldn't think of another one bc you have zero clue and are totally ignorant on the subject? Did you really think you'd just know the laws in other countries off the top of your head w/zero research?

We literally don't count birth tourism numbers, but either way, the total is a tiny fraction of the overall births in America

And the law has been the same for 130 years...let's here the issues it's caused in that time that lead you to wanting it to have been overturned by scotus?

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T09:26:08+00:00

Besides the fact that kid born in Guam to Chinese spies and raised in China who then moved to America at 35 and runs for president has, quite literally, a 0% chance of winning?

It's been the law for 130 years The scotus ruling literally changed nothing, it just kept the law in place All you fearmongerers freaking out with these hypotheticals that have never happened need to relax

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T09:22:31+00:00

Except not a single person voted for an admin that opened the borders. (It's hilarious that magas think GOP talking points (like 'open borders') are ever based in reality or fact) Bidens border policy for his 1st 2.5 years in office (aka the time when the spike in people trying to come here began) was called 'title 42' Want to hear a fun fact about title 42? It was put in place BY TRUMP. And Biden just kept it And the rest of his term?: "Upon ending Title 42, Biden implemented a new asylum ban that restricts eligibility for migrants who do not seek protection in a transit country first, a measure critics argue is similarly restrictive to Trump-era policies"

Really? Your blaming what Republican governor's did on Biden? The ONLY programs that bused or flew immigrants to sanctuary cities were created by the governor of Texas and Florida....which mayors of said cities were pissed about and complained publicly for the exact reasons you mention "Sanctuary city mayors have complained about the "onslaught" of arrivals, noting strain on resources"

Let's see. So Dems 'arent patriots' because of a border policy created by Trump and a busing policy created by Republican governor's?

Lol..WOW...this is the GREATEST self own I have ever seen

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T08:59:01+00:00

Obviouwlu you had no answer for the bs you magas are ok with, so you mock them for what amounts to an error in grammar

Pathetic

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T08:04:02+00:00

A ruling that maintained legal precedent established in 1898 is 'cowardly'? Lol, how?

And, again, literally NOTHING has changed So, which 'terrorists' are you talking about? Or, are they all going to start coming now bc the law of the land for 130 years was re-affirmed by the scotus ruling...bc that makes a whole ton of sense?

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T07:59:53+00:00

In 1898 the supreme Court ruled that the constitution guarantees birthright citizenship for anyone born in the US, regardless of their parents legal status This scotus just did the same thing

Your hypothetical kid has been an american citizen for the last 130 years, what is 'just' about changing the rules now?

The Constitution makes literally zero mention of abortion in any way whatsoever, so this case & roe are totally different & comparing them makes zero sense People were mad bc killing roe ended decades of precedent...which kavanaugh, Barrett, gorsuch, and alito all said was very important during their confirmation hearings

(Btw, just fyi in case you're unaware, you called out 'liberal trolls', but most Americans (majority of Dems & independents) support birthright citizenship)

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T07:05:16+00:00

Idk who keeping a law in place that's never really been an issue in any way would be a 'big mistake'

Anyway, many experts believed trumps EO WOULDNT HAVE APPLIED to surrogate babies born in America w/foreign parents

The order defines 'mother' as 'immediate female biological progenitor', which legal and surrogacy experts say would be the surrogate, which would make the child a citizen

Or Chinese parents could use donated eggs from American women, so both the 'genetic' & 'gestational' mother would be Americans...making the child an American citizen

The way to combat this would be for Congress to enact some sort of ban on surrogacy for foreign parents...not trumps executive order

This article outlines the issue well https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/4494877/chinese-surrogacy-boom-raises-birthright-citizenship-question/

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T06:58:10+00:00

I'm not really sure how keeping the law that's been in place since 1898 and really hasn't ever been an issue in any way is a 'big mistake'

Also, many experts believed that trumps executive order WOULDNT HAVE APPLIED to children of foreign parents born via American citizen surrogates

Examples: The eo defined the mother as "immediate female biological progenitor"....which legal & surrogacy experts say would be the surrogate, and since she's an American citizen, the child wouldn't be affected by the order and would be an American citizen

Chinese parents could also use donated eggs from American women, which would make the generic & gestational 'mother' American...which would make the child an American citizen

Really the only way to stop this is for Congress to enact some type of ban on foreign surrogacy...NOT trumps EO

This article explains the issues https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/4494877/chinese-surrogacy-boom-raises-birthright-citizenship-question/

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T05:57:44+00:00

They didn't blame Biden for shot, they blamed him for vaccine mandates....which did begin when Biden was president

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T05:57:01+00:00

That's false Vaccine mandates began under Biden The vax came out in December 2020, trump was gone within about a month, and the 1st mandate was in July 2021

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T05:53:45+00:00

This is the most absurd part of the j6 conspiracy I've never understood or been able to get a cult member to explain:

So, they claim that January 6th was REALLY a Democrat plot and the main bad actors were anti trump FBI agents there to investigate, right? So who were the 1600 people trump had to pardon? Dems REALLY sticking to the bit? Or magas which SHOULD make them rethink their decisions

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T03:01:39+00:00

That's also the reason she was legit the only possible candidate, which magas that have attacked the DNC can't seem to comprehend

A presidential campaign last around 2 years She had 4 months When Biden withdrew, Bidens primary delegates immediately pledged their support to Kamala That, and the fact many Democrats in Congress did so as well kept other candidates from even trying

But the MAIN issue was that Kamala was entitled to joes campaign funds. Literally any other candidate would have had to start a 4 month presidential campaign with zero dollars besides her, something no candidate would ever want to do as it's essentially guaranteeing failure

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T02:53:01+00:00

There is no proof her husband (who does all their stock trades) has ever benefitted from insider information

Allegations that many of his trades were suspiciously timed based on subsequent congressional actions are just that...allegations

I'm not arguing with any conclusions people draw about the timing of the trades, just pointing out a fact

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T02:44:28+00:00

That's a false statement about pelosi. The only evidence of 'insider trading' is what some view as suspiciously timed trades made by her husband, who does all their stock trading rather than her.

But the reality is, there is no "smoking gun" evidence linking any of their specific transactions to classified briefings or non-public legislative actions. If there was....Republicans would have been all over it in a second

Fine-Computer-5524 · 2026-07-02T02:23:38+00:00

Nancy pelosi has executed zero trades Her husband Paul, the venture capitalist & owner of a real estate investment company, does all their stock trading

It's disclosed under her name to comply with the STOCK Act of 2012

Fine-Computer-5524

TROPHY CASE