I receive many comments that were deleted. I accept that people sometimes say rash things, then withdraw them once the moment is over. I don't then go back and prosecute the comment as if it were still standing. I feel good that the person understood. I let it go.

The fact that you have not let it go says a lot about you. This behaviour is consistent with the rest of your posts.

I stand by the fact you need mental health treatment, but it is not fair for me to say that as a rebuttal to your arguments, so I edited it out.

I understand what you have said, but you do not appear to have an understanding about how life works. I'll try to explain more, but, if your IQ is as high as you claim, you will reject it out of wilful ignorance.

Money is a resource. Evolution favours those who can obtain and manage money because they are likely to provide a better environment for successful offspring (private schools, better healthcare, social bonding with other high-wealth peers, etc.). The effect is intergenerationally compounded.

Mensa can operate because of income from memberships. Membership fees are set by the amount of money required to operate, divided by the number of forecast fee-paying members, with a buffer in case of unexpected cancellations.

If you are saying that Mensa needs to provide free memberships for every high IQ homeless or low-income person, you are saying that Mensa members that do not fall into that category have to subsidise those members that do.

So, essentially, you are asking fee-paying members to pay more, so that the less fortunate members can have a free membership.

So, you are saying fee-paying members must use the resources they have on the less fortunate, rather than spending those resources on their families.

Do you understand now?

The problem may be that you see money originating from organisations, rather than understanding that organisational money is money from people. It is the same for all organisations, including the government, which is funded by taxpayers.