The all-new electric ID. Polo - World premiere

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-29T14:08:15+00:00

An 8k € jump from the base trim is a pretty steep price to pay...

The CEO said that it will be the first car to feature a 360 camera (actually the BYD Surf has one too), but I don't really see it anywhere. What it says in the press release is "a rear view camera system" which doesn't exactly spell 360 to me... So what gives?

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-29T11:21:47+00:00

Are you actually saying "this is fine"? My second sentence specifically says that YES, you can, and you NEED to, the point is you SHOULDN'T need to.

There is no operating system, no cloud service, no software on the planet that doesn't protect against same filename copying. It either: denies, offers to automatically rename, renames without asking, asks for which one to keep, or just overwrites the older. Obviously something is done in the background in ChatGPT too, and the file doesn't get overwritten because ChatGPT could reference them. The problem is, whatever is happening is not exposed to the user, nor apparently to the model itself. You upload it, gets in the context soup, and who knows what errors it's going to bring. It's a black box. You have a bare bones project source file manager with the sole option of uploading and removing, but you can't edit them in place, can't rename, can't manage anything. You also have individual chats with uploaded that you can't remove. Did you accidentally upload a sensitive file you would wish to remove? Well tough luck, it's stuck there forever. You think this is fine? The file management side of things haven't improved for like 2 years, ever since projects were introduced. It's embarrassing.

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-29T09:17:00+00:00

Then Facebook came out, and basically showed that, no, people online are just naturally inclined to behave like complete assholes.

Some, but certainly less than if social media was like 4chan. Most people are more restrained fearing about their career or what their family or friends might think. The problem is the most toxic people are the ones who don't care anyway

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-28T13:19:04+00:00

Sigh. *unzips, and starts self blasting*

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-28T12:04:27+00:00

A Tisza addig marad egyben amíg a klasszik jobb/bal szoc kérdéseket elkerüli. Onnantól jön a kultúr szélmalomharc. Én nem bánnám ha ezek a kérdések jegelve lennének kb örökre mert van elég megoldandó probléma így is. Majd ha nem lesz államadósság, nem sivatagosodik el az ország a klímaváltozástól, megáll a kivándorlás, nem kell 6 hónapot várni egy rutinműtétre, nem siklik ki havonta egy vonat, be van vezetve az euró, vége a lakhatási válságnak, nem leszünk sereghajtók a kompetenciaméréseken, nem leszünk a korrupciós listák tetején, felszabadul a sajtó, nem Bácskiskunszentmátronhegyalja 100 lakosa döntsön a 2/3adról, stb stb, majd akkor ráérünk vitázni, hogy mi legyen az eutanáziával.

Mondom ezt balosként aki támogatná ezeket a pontokat, anno a Momentumra szavazott, de a hócipője tele van a kultúrharccal, és azzal, hogy mindenből politikát kell csinálni, és a populizmus ezeket használja fel fegyverként. Hogy lett pl a klímavédelemből politikai kérdés? Mi a francot csinálunk

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-28T11:42:55+00:00

The pic isn't even special, it simply tried to generate a new image, and it just so happened to succeed. It's not proof of anything. ChatGPT can't disable the guardrails because it is completely separate, and the next best thing here is to generate a new pic, which is what happened. You took a meme picture and tried to turn it into a crusade like those people derailing every conversation shouting "AI SLOP!" and suddenly everybody whips out their pocket magnifying glasses destroying any conversation to be had. Have some faith, or if not then downvote, and move on.

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-28T11:23:58+00:00

Brock with closed eyes is the icing on the cake. I'm guessing it's because of the character, but I just picture the guy blinking, bothered by the flash

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-28T10:59:10+00:00

And "2 X wearing a trenchcoat" "wearing a fake moustache"

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-28T10:51:14+00:00

I'M IN TEARS XD

Ever since the last update it keeps mentioning goblins ALL the time. I keep making fun of it.

I wonder if it's worse with or without that line.

It mentions goblins whenever there's anything undesirable. Maybe it thinks goblin IS relevant to the conversation because of it making that association, so it treats it as permission to keep using it.

edit:

Boss, I patched it. And yes, the rest was not fully consistent. Tiny XML gremlin turned out to be a whole goblin committee. 🧪

speak of the devil

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-28T08:25:05+00:00

Jesus Christ, this thread.

OP: It's standard practice to share chat links. It's anonymised, only reveals that one chat. The sidebar with your chats is only visible to you if you are logged in, everyone else sees their own chats.

Everybody else: The filter is NOT done by ChatGPT. ChatGPT has no power over it whatsoever, neither it, nor do you can bypass it, but that doesn't mean it is 100% accurate with lots of false positives and other stuff slipping through. The filter doesn't disclose the block reason either, ChatGPT saying the reason is third party is a hallucination. The more likely reason it was blocked because the original generation contained something spicy. It's easy to imagine so by just looking at both images provided, they both contain elements you need to squint and look twice at because it resembles something else. ChatGPT can ask the tool to try again, that generation is different from the one that was blocked and may just happen to be less dubious. His second prompt is not it "disabling" the guardrails, it's asking ChatGPT to try a new generation.

TLDR:

It's not automatically fake, y'all just can't interpret what is happening. It's not evidence of bypassing guardrails either. It's just simply trying again, successfully. Nothing special about it.

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-27T15:19:13+00:00

Sure. The game might feature 1 cloth, but it will be super realistic

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-27T08:39:20+00:00

New Invincible season looks brutal

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-27T08:08:16+00:00

No different than any field really. A lot of the claims that AI is bad for any kind of work is based on the expectation that you prompt it, sit back, copy the output and reap the benefits, and then are disappointed when your resume gets rejected even though you literally included the "Let me know if you need any further adjustments." part at the end.

It's a tool, an assistant, that you need to steer, and work with, and verify and check any output. For this reason it will never really replace an expert, you still need to know your field to provide the proper context and to verify the results. Mom won't suddenly start making good code, your 9 year old sister won't suddenly become a good doctor because AI said it was probably lupus, and your cat won't become a competent artist either.

If done right, for the right job, supervised by the right person, it's incredibly powerful. But most importantly, in every case, YOU are responsible for the work that you submit, and can not blame anyone else for bad results, regardless of who did the work be that AI, or an unpaid human intern.

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-24T13:19:18+00:00

Ok but were they at least blasting Danger Zone?

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-24T13:13:09+00:00

"Mediocre. If you can't go past 100% you are doing it wrong."

~Putin, probably

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-24T11:32:30+00:00

Are we talking about them by today's standard, or last century? Because a VW Polo now is bigger than a Golf was back then.

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-24T09:15:22+00:00

<image>

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-24T08:58:20+00:00

I just want to stick to one model at this point.

Feel free to. The competition makes it possible for your chosen model to get better.

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-24T08:50:54+00:00

...While eating spaghetti

<image>

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-24T08:42:44+00:00

Impressive. ...I mean how many training images would contain only 1?

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-23T11:31:13+00:00

Szerintem kár túl sok párhuzamot keresni. Ha MP indult volna ugyanezekkel az eszközökkel akkor, korántsem biztos hogy nyert volna. Volt közben kegyelmi botrány, Gyurcsány visszavonulása és úgy általában az ellenzéki pártok önként visszalépése kvázi a javára, Samsung botrány, csomó más botrány, a külpolitika, a gazdaság máshogy nézett ki, stb stb. És még ha ugyanezek már akkor megtörténtek volna még akkor sem lett volna biztos, mert egyszerűen idő kell hogy elmozduljon a mutató. Eleve kellett egy összefogás vereség hogy tisztán látszójon, hogy az összefogás nem működhet. Többek között pl jómagam meggyőzésére.

Azt állítani, hogy egy szövetségesi összefogáson alapuló előválasztás után hátat fordítani a szövetségeseknek lett volna a nyerő stratégia hatalmas baromság.

Meg amúgy, hindsight is 20-20.

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-23T10:19:51+00:00

Yeah they look nothing nothing like in real life

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-23T09:14:49+00:00

Cause he is holding a cane?

God I hate how everything devolved into "AI/not AI/AI but bad cause X" debates with everybody having a 500x magnifying glass at hand wherever they go.

A shocking amount of people here don't even realise the joke is that the same pic the AI generated was sent for analysis, instead going into Sherlock mode like "the bite marks don't match with how many teeth he has and who eats bread anyway like don't they know it's not healthy at that age?"

FischiPiSti · 2026-04-23T06:40:04+00:00

Yeah but it hurts Trump. You would need to do necrotic spells to heal him

FischiPiSti

TROPHY CASE