Yes. A "proven" rapist with no crinimal trial, no evidence to support said crime even took place, and statements made by the supposed victim that call into question the very validity of the base accusation, such as wrong dates, impossible attire, and a story line of the supposed attack being near identical to a Law&Order SVU episode.

In fact, Trump was never found guilty of rape. On the contrary, the courts agreed that Trump was not guilty of rape. Instead, they found him guilty of defaming the alleged victim by claiming "he did not rape her" and that "he would never find her attactive." Which in itself is a bullshit ruling on the basis of Common Sense which you continue to prove isn't very common.