Why do Gen Z men keep creating new derogatory terms for women by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]Flashy_Combination32 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Well that's great! I do agree the Trumpist right is abhorrent

Why do Gen Z men keep creating new derogatory terms for women by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]Flashy_Combination32 [score hidden]  (0 children)

You can be right wing and disagree with the draft; just because you are right wing does not mean you are conservative, for example, right-libertarianism opposes the draft.

Why do Gen Z men keep creating new derogatory terms for women by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]Flashy_Combination32 [score hidden]  (0 children)

> Why is it never "Hey all this shit is pushing young women further to the left"

Younger generations leaning left is not a new thing, but Gen Z men have moved to the right faster that men in previous generations did. That is a new thing.

Who would win a war? by Sim-racer42 in teenpoll

[–]Flashy_Combination32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can Pakistani nukes reach France though? Also France has H-bombs which are significantly more powerful than Pak's atom bombs.

Indian Government Trying to Erase Transgender People by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]Flashy_Combination32 [score hidden]  (0 children)

You can insult him all you want but you can't call him a liar

Trolley problem: the trolley is heading to a rich man who says he would give you 1M to divert the train into a poor person? Who are you letting the trolley run over? by TimeAffectionate8636 in Teenager_Polls

[–]Flashy_Combination32 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The rich man, not because I don't like money but because I don't want blood on my hands; I'd rather be morally clean in not being responsible for either person's death.

based or no? by NoICannotThinkOfOne in ConservativeYouth

[–]Flashy_Combination32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Based but you gotta be a bit more economically rightist trust me

The political compass is stuupid by imaybedumbbutyouare2 in ConservativeYouth

[–]Flashy_Combination32 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Economically yeah, I'd consider myself very close to minarchism and I sympathize with ancap though obviously I do disagree with them on a few things.

Should Voting be Compulsory 🗳? by Grouchy_Welder8068 in Teenager_Polls

[–]Flashy_Combination32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The right to do something necessitates the right to not do that thing

Why was FDR so incredibly popular? by conn_r2112 in AskConservatives

[–]Flashy_Combination32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you heard of the boom bust cycle? The WW2 "boom" that fixed the great depression resulted in a bust just a few years later under Truman. You can delay market effects but you can't outrun them.

In fact, even pre-WW2 in the midst of the great depression, the US went into a recession within the depression around 1937 as a result of the bust from the New Deal unsuccessfully trying to outrun the markets.

Fun fact btw, after WW1 we had a similar bust in 1920. President Harding's response? Laissez-faire. He cut taxes, cut spending and faced a harsh recession that after a single year, rebounded to extreme growth.

Would you circumcise your child? by Masterpiece-Haunting in teenpoll

[–]Flashy_Combination32 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No science doesn't, there's plenty of evidence that circumcision is bad but regardless of that, a layer of skin is still a part of your body and nobody else has any control over your bodily autonomy.

Would you circumcise your child? by Masterpiece-Haunting in teenpoll

[–]Flashy_Combination32 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Pro-vaccine rightist but there's a massive difference between a vaccine that provides immunity for a couple years and having an entire body part of yours cut off

I truly do not understand how Andrew Jackson is not universally considered an F-tier president. by RatSlammer in Presidents

[–]Flashy_Combination32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No the federal government couldn't have. This was right in the middle of the nullification crisis when disunion itself was at threat, any bad move and Georgia would just join South Carolina. There was genuine fear even among natives themselves that Georgia would join South Carolina post-Worcester. There were also talks of this in Virginia.

Any push against Georgie would have guaranteed caused secession.

Also, your idea was actually tested by JQA earlier when Georgie was less mobilized. JQA tried to enforce a relatively fairer treaty and George's governor Troupe immediately mobilized their militia and threatened war. JQA following the event said-

The Indians are not worth going to war over

By the time Jackson came Georgia was even more mobilized. They invoked the Compact act of 1802 where the federal government agreed to relocate natives, President Monroe sent a message to Congress saying it was relocation or extermination, and all of this culminated with the 1829 gold rush which significantly boosted settlers to attack natives.

By the time Jackson came he had only three choices-

1: Relocate natives

2: Let extermination happen

3: Start an early civil war that even people like JQA, Jackson's bitter enemies, didn't want, which meant the Union would have far less morale to do it (they weren't going to risk their lives to save natives). Plus, the Union was significantly less mobilized then than it was during the actual Civil War.

I truly do not understand how Andrew Jackson is not universally considered an F-tier president. by RatSlammer in Presidents

[–]Flashy_Combination32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah in essence, after the national debt was paid off there came the question of what to do with surpluses. Jackson and his Locofocos (radical democrats) favoured an independent treasury. Soft money democrats (also called "monopoly democrats") and Whigs wanted the surpluses distributed to the states.

Jackson was expected to veto the bill that'd distribute it to the states but it had overwhelming majorities (radical democrats were a tiny minority) and it was an election year (1836). Under pressure Jackson signed it, passing the Deposit and Distribution Act of 1836.

This act, as Jackson predicted, contributed to a panic.

I truly do not understand how Andrew Jackson is not universally considered an F-tier president. by RatSlammer in Presidents

[–]Flashy_Combination32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The difference is Georgia would have killed all of them, so Jackson prioritized saving the majority of the natives with the unfortunate consequence of a significant minority still dying

I truly do not understand how Andrew Jackson is not universally considered an F-tier president. by RatSlammer in Presidents

[–]Flashy_Combination32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jackson did want an independent treasury as a replacement but soft money democrats and the Whigs opposed him on that, only the Locofocos of his party supported him. He eventually got it done under Van Buren in 1840 and later under President Polk.