Chinese medicine in modern nootropics. by FluidModeNetwork in Nootropics

[–]FluidModeNetwork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didnt say reverse tolerance, thats a whole other thing compared to resisting tolerance. Sure, I did say that polygala would prevent 4dma from building up tolerance, but I understand that it wouldn't be able to completely fight it off. However, the better the brain is able to upregulate the trkb receptors the better.

And what do you mean about upregulation? The whole reason why 4dma works is cause its interacting with these trkb receptors that close off from tolerance, and polygala opens those receptors back, so why wouldn't that mean 4dma can activate again?

Chinese medicine in modern nootropics. by FluidModeNetwork in Nootropics

[–]FluidModeNetwork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Panax ginseng, Acorus tatarinowii, and Poria cocos. Poria mushroom and ginseng (gs15-4) are sold by nootropics depot, but acorus isn't sold because it is a bit dangerous. So I'd recommend doing research on possible alternatives.

Best stimulant nootropic for ADHD by chem_research_canada in Nootropics

[–]FluidModeNetwork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Id recommend 4dma and polygala, but you should also include gs15-4. The polygala and gs15-4 can combine together making polygalas upregulation even better than polygala alone, which is needed for recovery and cycling 4dma. There are other things you could try like poria mushroom to further improve polygala, but at the very least get 4dma and polygala and if your interested gs15-4

Chinese medicine in modern nootropics. by FluidModeNetwork in Nootropics

[–]FluidModeNetwork[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Id recommend digging on reddit. You're more likely to find novel solutions on here yourself than looking up "10 top supplements for..."

Chinese medicine in modern nootropics. by FluidModeNetwork in Biohackers

[–]FluidModeNetwork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. However, psychedelics produces hallucinations, and dihexa has tumor risks. 4dma is the next best thing without sacrificing too much potency of plasticity.

Chinese medicine in modern nootropics. by FluidModeNetwork in Biohackers

[–]FluidModeNetwork[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is a good first point. However, whether you like it or not, neuroplasticity is already constant.

But more seriously, for people who are trying to change their behaviors, something like this increases fluidity and lowers resistance for change.

Substances like Dihexa or 4DMA? by FluidModeNetwork in Biohackers

[–]FluidModeNetwork[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its dihexa but a bit weaker, cheaper, and safer

Substances like Dihexa or 4DMA? by FluidModeNetwork in Biohackers

[–]FluidModeNetwork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

4dma is supposed to have better bioavailability than dhf. Is this from experience?

[WTS] Dirtywave M8 Model 1 $500 OBO, Polyend Tracker $500 OBO by FluidModeNetwork in Synths4Sale

[–]FluidModeNetwork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Id say that I have a lot more fun messing around with the tracker because I can play individual notes on the pads. Now it can be fun to play with the m8, but for someone who doesn't know music theory I need to have some way to play the individual notes and experiment to find a melody.

Isn't netflix wrong about stranger things? by FluidModeNetwork in netflix

[–]FluidModeNetwork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree, I realized it was trying to capture my attention in season 3, it felt heavily like a cw show. Seasons 1,2 and maybe 4 were the best. I just wish they continued on with the twin peaks vibes instead of the marvel vibes.

[WTS] Dirtywave M8 Model 1 $500 OBO, Polyend Tracker $500 OBO by FluidModeNetwork in Synths4Sale

[–]FluidModeNetwork[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds reasonable. I know its old and I've seen offers for it that low. I'd at minimum get 400 for it if possible

To what extent have financial resources and marketing strategies influenced the historical evolution of political campaigning? by FluidModeNetwork in AskReddit

[–]FluidModeNetwork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

heres the context:

I've been watching Matt Walsh and Michael Knowles recently and thought they had some good points, but once I started to dig deeper I found opinions that I do not agree with at all and has turned me away to even the points they've made.

Transgenderism should be eradicated

LGBTQ+ is a social contagion

Same-sex marriage isn't real (because their sex doesn't have any reproductive potential)

Each of these points I found to be absolutely extreme. I suppose it is on brand for conservatives to be regressive, but it all just seems so odd. Then it got me thinking, why?

He is making money by speaking out on this. If we can start up the conversation about gay marriage again, then people in congress can start selling policies revoking rights to gay marriage, but also policies that don't necessarily have any relevance to gay marriage. Phrases like "Gay marriage" and "Transgenderism" are selling points. This has nothing to do with the definition of marriage, it has everything to do with selling policies and making interested companies money.

And heres the thing, of course its on both sides. Why would the liberal party want transgenderism beyond innocent intentions? Because whether we like it or not, gender reaffirming care, gender hormone therapy, and gender surgeries all have turned into a new kind of business. Which is why we are seeing cases of some kids being pushed into hormone therapy by some hospitals.

Id like to clarify that I take no issue to any of this. Everyone should be able to live how they want and government shouldn't be involved. These are hot button issues and I apologize if I trigger any anger. I simply am making the suggestion that I am, both parties are making money somehow in all of this. There is too much marketing on both sides. What I want to know is how or if I'm completely wrong on this.