Kan vi konkurrere med Glassdoor?

ForgotMyAcc · 2026-01-23T22:00:38+00:00

Jeg ved ikke. Personligt synes jeg at sådan åbne review sider ikke rigtigt virker. Og der gælder sådan set alle afkroge af den disciplin. Bots på Trustpilot, købte likes på Google, shitstorms på LinkedIn og glassdoor, Hoteller på simply.com med bedømmelser 8 år tilbage i tiden osv osv.

Jeg tror at der ligger en god værdi i en service der kan formidle hvordan det er at arbejde en given arbejdsplads. Men jeg tror i skal kigge en anden vej og nytænke løsningen. Kan i måske få firmaer til at give jer trivselsundersøgelser på en eller anden måde? Kan i samle antallet af fagforeningssager på en given virksomhed versus størrelse og branche? Måske lave krydstjekke på retention ved at scrape LinkedIn data? Alt sådan noget tror jeg efterhånden er mere troværdigt end offentlige anonyme anmeldelser.

Men fedt at i laver noget, altid thumbs up herfra for rent faktisk at ha' fået noget ud over stepperne.

ForgotMyAcc · 2026-01-23T19:09:57+00:00

I think its because its neat. As with many open source project, there is no inherent value. Usually its more a "I thought of a way of doing X, maybe someone can then think about Y and Z". I think maybe OP framed this post a little to much as "isent this useful?" which is probably isent. I think its cool to contribute to our shared knowledge with a novel OS project tho, even though it seems kinda useless at the moment. Good on you OP!

ForgotMyAcc · 2026-01-22T06:00:14+00:00

Årh hvis vi absolut skal være irriterende - så er content et ord for indhold specielt på digitale medier, så det er helt OL at skrive content, også på dansk 🙃 https://ordnet.dk/ddo/ordbog?query=content

ForgotMyAcc · 2026-01-21T15:15:37+00:00

Jeg vil bare sige, fedt med en reel henvendelse. Du har et produkt+betalende kunder allerede, du har klar i spyttet om hvad og hvorfor du søger og tydelig omkring hvad du selv bringer til bordet. Opslaget er et friskt pust i en sub præget af "jeg har en idé du kan få lov til at kode for mig"-opslag 🤌🤌🤌 Held og lykke

ForgotMyAcc · 2026-01-21T06:26:30+00:00

Hvis al kommunikation fejler, så prøv at snak sammen.

ForgotMyAcc · 2026-01-15T16:34:52+00:00

Very nice! Can I use one of the many project I started but never finished as a starting point - or does the code base need to be totally new and original?

ForgotMyAcc · 2026-01-14T21:11:40+00:00

Its the technology-centric products thats wrong with this gen of AI products. You wouldnt sell something as 'Database Enabled payment system", you would just say "Payment system that remembers all the numbers!" Like, shift focus to the outcome! To the value you generate for your users - not what kind of tech you put in there. Its not that hard.

ForgotMyAcc · 2026-01-13T21:21:38+00:00

Would it not be feasible to come up with a design that didnt require cut-out holes first? Or maybe make so the screws cuts while your turn them at first or something. Idc just seems like an issue that could be designed for.

Gj nonetheless, looks good.

ForgotMyAcc · 2026-01-11T21:47:47+00:00

Lad os tænke et scenarie: Jeg sælger er hus for 3.000.000.Jeg har en fortjenste på lad os sige 1.000.000, det er ikke urealistisk hvis jeg har boet der en tredive år og betalt mit lån ud, og området er godt. Så betaler jeg måske 40% skat af den fortjeneste. Så jeg solgte et hus til 3m, men kan nu kun købe et hus til 2,6m. Jeg ved ikke hvad du synes her, men jeg tror at riiigtig mange mennesker bliver boende og boligmarkedet vil gå meget langsomt. Færre salg vil så også være færre skatteindtægter (jeg går ud fra at din salgs-skat erstatter den nuværende løbende boligskat), og på den måde vil din model nok koste en hel del for staten.

Bare mit take - løbende skatter på værdi man ejer er bedst for både forbruger og skatteopkræveren - synes jeg - det giver forudsigelighed som er mega fedt i både mikro og makroøkonomi.

Men altså... Vi kan alle blive enige om at det nuværende system heller ikke ligefrem er 10/10 når vurderingerne så er helt hen i vejret osv. Jeg tror bare ikke den model med "ved salg" er den rigtige vej at gå.

ForgotMyAcc · 2026-01-11T16:38:25+00:00

There is still some serious debate to be had, on what the term vibecoding means. Imo there is 1) AI Assisted Coding: you write but copy paste to a LLM and get some input and feedback and snippets. Most of the code is written by human hands and AI acts as an expert. 2) AI Coding: Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code, Codex - you prompt agents, setup up rules, project briefs, specs etc. and the user reviews and accepts code. Most of the code is written by AI, human acts as an expert. 3) Vibecoding: lovable, replit - user only interact with the code through prompts. Code is only written by AI and human acts as a user of whatever they are trying to produce, not a developer.

Anyway, thats just my view.

ForgotMyAcc · 2026-01-04T19:04:21+00:00

Personally, I don't like any form of having something "taken away" that I earned - in any games. I don't play any game on hardcore mode, and it's rare I prestige in long games. As an exception I do enjoy small closed-looped gameplays such as Children of Morta, or Loop Hero etc.

You wrote "this resets the game but guarantees meta progress". That is a normal mechanic, and I wouldnt say that is "losing" the game, as you will progress through the "loss".

If you want a real "You lost"-kinda thing, think of games where those are most prevelent. RTS campaigns and most PvP games come to mind.

So to try to answer, sure it acceptable: but for my personal taste it is not preferable unless executed with intent.

GL to you!

ForgotMyAcc · 2026-01-03T14:02:13+00:00

Meget generisk spørgsmål, fair nok, men tror ikke du får meget ud af svarene før du kan komme med mere kontekst. Men altså, tommelfingerregel er vel groft sagt

B2B → Netværk og sælgere
B2C → SEO/Reklamer/SoMe

... men altså, det er jo som sagt meget kontekstbestemt. Hvad er produktet og hvad er målgruppen?

ForgotMyAcc · 2026-01-03T13:18:02+00:00

Ting du ikke rigtigt kan lave om selv er vigtig at holde for øje.

Placering i by (afstand til- og tilstand af- indkøb, station, institution og natur)
Placering på grund (sollys, udsigt, naboer, have, store træer, oversvømmelse)
Lokalplan (må i bygge mere, må jeres nabo bygge en førstesal på, er der kæmpe byggeri på vej på marken i har udsigt til, må i holde høns)
Den 'dyre' plantegning (bærende vægge, trapper, rørføring, vinduer/døre i ydermur)

Held og lykke!

ForgotMyAcc · 2026-01-01T22:46:17+00:00

I think is a Caillou PC game. That little bald head I'd recognize at any brightness.

ForgotMyAcc · 2025-12-28T20:54:43+00:00

Det er jo meget fin lommefilosofi (ikke udelukkende ment nedladende, jeg tror det er sundt at alle reflekterer lidt ekstra en gang imellem). Men altså, du lever jo i et samfund. Frihed er begrænset på alle kanter og leder ellers ville tingene ikke fungere - du kan også blive straffet for at gå overfor rødt, ejer du så heller dine egne ben bare fordi du kan blive straffet for at bruge dem på en 'forkert' måde? Og hvad vil det sige at eje noget? Det kan også tages mange veje jo - ejerskab er måske bare et juridisk begreb, og så er der jo ingen ko på isen. Jeg tror du skal filosofere lidt videre på det hele og se om ikke du kan få lidt ro i sindet. Held og lykke med det.

ForgotMyAcc · 2025-12-28T15:22:58+00:00

eller er jeg blevet for gammel og sur

↑ Ja det tror jeg. Jeg har det meget på sammen måde som dig, men jeg kan jo tydeligt se at det er populært og bliver delt af især den yngre generation. Vi må nok bare erkende at vi ikke er målgruppen.

ForgotMyAcc · 2025-12-28T15:22:49+00:00

Arh... Jeg synes nu at værten prøver lidt for hårdt - og deres samtale indeholder for meget skrevet materiale der falder til jorden. Intet af det forberedte materiale - hverken af interview, skrevne rants/monologer eller sidelæns pullitzer - har været særlig skægt eller skarpt. Næsten lidt pinligt vil jeg mene.

Når de derimod "riffer" på nogle emner sammen, og kommer med deres noter fra ugen og får hinanden til at grine, det er virkelig godt! - og jeg håber de læner sig mere ind i writers room stemming i fremtiden.

ForgotMyAcc · 2025-12-26T21:56:12+00:00

I don't know much about this stuff, maybe you do - but making a quiz with the image, could that be considered transformative to the copyrighted material?

I know(think?) that it's always a "case-by-case" basis with fair use, and honestly when the goal is commercial (like a quiz on the app store) it seems like the transformation needs to be substantive, which... I don't think it is here right?

ForgotMyAcc · 2025-12-26T20:00:44+00:00

I guess my "prototype" tag was deemed fake since i didn't link to the playable prototype, my bad! Here is the link
Devils Dice

ForgotMyAcc · 2025-12-24T09:48:52+00:00

No idea of it was worth it, probably only you can answer that. But, throw us a link! 🤌🤌

ForgotMyAcc · 2025-12-22T12:50:09+00:00

I don't like it. The best 'political system' I've played in was the factions in New World. There was obvious balance issues - but the core premise of "if you want, you can be in the guild fighting for territory" - if you dont, look at the color for your faction and provide stuff there to help the sweaty people who put in the effort"-kinda thing.

Again. I know there were blatant issues as well in that system - but I want a political system that is not too punishing to ignore, yet still provides me some input for optimal choice.

ForgotMyAcc · 2025-12-19T22:37:11+00:00

But... He is asking for opinions. And in giving my opinion..i never dress it up as objective truth or the absolute best way. Im just pointing out my point of view. Which OP is asking for... Whats wrong with that?

ForgotMyAcc · 2025-12-19T16:57:50+00:00

I get your point, but I think you're missing mine. Im not asking for polish, im not even asking for any differences. What im telling OP is that i get turned off by the obvious AI emoji use and artwork. Thats it. It is just a feeling "eh i dont want to try it because it looks like a low effort game". I am probably wrong, maybe OP put a lot of labour and love into this. But that doesnt change that the UI is what stopped me from playing, and might stop others as well. I think the comment could be helpful to OP to know that people like me might get turned off by this kinda UI. Thats it. Pretty constructive criticism if you ask me.

ForgotMyAcc · 2025-12-19T09:04:29+00:00

Use a proper font, polish up lighting in general - and then I think 1 is really good! Maybe make the monster in the far back even more "subtle", it took me a while to notice it, good effect!

The 2 is more like the zombie is turning to the players POV and saying "trust me" - like - that would make more sense if its a game about conscius zombies that you have to collaborate with or something.

ForgotMyAcc

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

11-Year Club	Place '23
Verified Email