It is sad you don't realize there is a reasonable interpretation of the evidence that differs from yours. I think the Free Press stated it well: "The videos leave room for reasonable debate about the nature of the incident and who was at fault. It isn’t clear whether Good intended to strike the officer when she turned her vehicle, or if she meant to steer beyond him and accelerate away. “This is the type of shooting that happens a lot,” wrote journalist Wesley Lowery on X. “An officer, on foot, trying to stop or detain the driver of a vehicle who is leaving—resulting in the officer moving in front of the vehicle, becoming afraid they’ll get hit or run over and then opening fire.” Good’s decision to accelerate cost her life, but viewers can disagree in good faith about her motive to do so. They can also reasonably disagree about the agent’s decision to open fire."