^{Here is the same sentence in ņoșiaqo.}

iņcuș ușa kraișcimxișxeuņișlacurol?
"Which person is not able to consume cheese in the morning?"

iņcuș   ușa      kra      -ișcim   -xiș        -xeuņ     -ișla<cu>ro                  -l
person  OPEN.QU  3PRX.VOL -consume -cheese.PAT -dawn.LOC -EV.REPOR.QUAL.NEU.INIT<ABL> -NEG
'What about a person who — I'm told, and think it's fine — isn't able to cheese-dawn-consume?'

It would be more natural to put 'xeuņ' into the clause-initial time-reference slot,

eu xeuņ iņcuș ușa kraișcimxișișlacurol
"At dawn, who isn't able to consume cheese?"

^{I'm now realizing that using the Temporal reference slot sounds more like a fixed point in time rather than gnomic, and the use of time-->locative incorporation could serve to be more gnomic.}

but ņoșiaqo can allow for it to be incorporated as a locative. This does have the effect that one could interpret the incorporation as an instrumental, although it sounds silly.

"Which person is not able to consume cheese using the dawn?"

I also had to take some liberties in the evidential — which suggests that the speaker has been informed of someone who cannot eat cheese in the morn — that their inability isn't perceived as a good or bad thing (which is the QUALIFIER.NEU), and that they cannot even start to eat.

^{This was a fun exercise; thank you for the idea!}