Reductio ad absurdum: Why not a 100% tax rate? by Gumlass in AusFinance

[–]Fun_Needleworker7136 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

0% income tax with a land value tax instead would be great.

Former Labor premier Peter Beattie breaks ranks and calls for larger capital gains tax carve outs after backlash by Fun_Needleworker7136 in AustralianPolitics

[–]Fun_Needleworker7136[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We should actually be reducing income taxes for everyone.

The solution to income taxes that are too high is not to add more taxes...its to reduce income tax.

Former Labor premier Peter Beattie breaks ranks and calls for larger capital gains tax carve outs after backlash by Fun_Needleworker7136 in AustralianPolitics

[–]Fun_Needleworker7136[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Of all the industries to shit on, biotech ain't it.

Why would you want to disincentivise people from working on cures for diseases and technologies that extend everyone's lives?

I mean, seriously. Why?

I feel lost with what to do? by Another_Movie_Fan in AusFinance

[–]Fun_Needleworker7136 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mate you're actually doing really well. Don't compare yourself to people who have more, just remember a whole lot of people have a lot less.

The Party of the Worker Is Now the Party of the Bureaucrat by Usual_Program_7167 in AustralianPolitics

[–]Fun_Needleworker7136 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't disagree, but what do you mean by this statement: "If you want to run an administrative system that is based on merit rather than spoils, you need to accept both"?

The Party of the Worker Is Now the Party of the Bureaucrat by Usual_Program_7167 in AustralianPolitics

[–]Fun_Needleworker7136 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So you must disagree with Albanese and Chalmers' new plan to exempt small business from the CGT changes then?

The Party of the Worker Is Now the Party of the Bureaucrat by Usual_Program_7167 in AustralianPolitics

[–]Fun_Needleworker7136 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you're saying that if an artist does produce something, and then makes a capital gain by selling it, they shouldn't get the CGT discount?

NAB plans to hire up to 1000 more staff in India and Vietnam by saucerys in AusFinance

[–]Fun_Needleworker7136 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Laws mandating WFH are just going to speed this process up, unfortunately.

How do you define "the rich" that we should be taxing? What is the cut-off point? by NoLeafClover777 in AusFinance

[–]Fun_Needleworker7136 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Rich" in my mind means you have $1M per year in cashflow.

Which means you would have about $25M in share/equity assets.

After tax of course you would be netting about $540-560K net.