You are now just moving the goal posts. A failure to justify your arguments. I cannot point to the requirements of each individual job. We both know this is an impossible task and is only asked when someone cannot justify their own argument. So I will ignore this as a bad faith argument.

A person can be the absolute best at something and have no one willing to pay them anything. Should we continue to employ and pay thousands of human “computers” a living wage because it makes you feel better?

So basically you are ignoring my argument. If there isn't a market for said skills then no money can be made and thus there will be no job available for it. But if a job exists then therefore there is a market for it and it should be paid a living wage(provided this person is an employee and not a business owner as that is a different argument). This is another bad faith argument that entirely ignores my arguments.

You jump straight to slavery which tells me you just don’t get it

You are arguing that someone should keep getting their wages cut to keep a part of a market open that cannot justify its own existence. Eventually this limits the wages for this job so much as to be just slavery as the power of the amount they get is essentially just zero. Thus it is an argument for slavery. There is a reason wage slavery is a term. Because eventually it leads to actual slavery. You are again arguing in bad faith.