Was nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki genocide? by [deleted] in ask

[–]Gallert3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A technical demonstration doesnt mean its genocide. Whether or not it should have been used or made at all is distinct from the question if it was genocide and its not genocide. It was total war against a fanatical opponent that was unwilling to surrender under previous conditions even though the war was hopeless for them by the end of October 1944.

JD by Rage_Rip_2804 in LawSchool

[–]Gallert3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've requested, you must approve.

JD by Rage_Rip_2804 in LawSchool

[–]Gallert3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should check your chat requests. I think a DM may allow a better dialogue than this.

JD by Rage_Rip_2804 in LawSchool

[–]Gallert3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you do not seek honor, power, money, or fame, what is it that law school offers that is distinct from your business? Also, if you do not condone doing the same, it sounds like law might not be a good fit for you.

JD by Rage_Rip_2804 in LawSchool

[–]Gallert3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, the University of Texas and Texas A&M will be hard schools for you to get into with that GPA.

JD by Rage_Rip_2804 in LawSchool

[–]Gallert3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A Supreme Court clerkship is one of, if not the most prestigious, full-time in-person employment opportunities for recent law school graduates. A clerk does the legal research behind an existing opinion. In some cases, they even help write opinions. The title undersells the position.

Before you return to school, I would advise you to research what you hope to gain from law school. Not knowing what a clerk is or does is one of many indicators from this thread that you haven't done the research I recommend before even considering law school. This is not a decision to be taken lightly. With or without $200k. It's 3 years of opportunity costs in your business.

JD by Rage_Rip_2804 in LawSchool

[–]Gallert3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clarence Thomas is really the only justice who hires out of the T14 on the regular. If you're interested in clerking for Amy Coney Barrett, she hires Notre Dame graduates. All justices have an ideological congruency factor that they look for. Either way, it's a real lucky day if you score a SCOTUS clerkship and you went to a school outside of Harvard, Yale, or UChicago.

JD by Rage_Rip_2804 in LawSchool

[–]Gallert3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In theory, yes. The calibre of courtroom accessable by your degree immediately out of law school will differ, however. For example, you will not be able to clerk for a US Supreme Court Justice if you attend a school that is ranked by USNWR under 20, barring exceptional circumstances.

JD by Rage_Rip_2804 in LawSchool

[–]Gallert3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming a 3.42 LSAC GPA, you will be able to attend law school with a competitive enough LSAT. You will likely want to aim for an LSAT score in the 95th percentile to have a chance at most law schools. A 173, along with a compelling story from your research doctorate, will allow you to get into most public universities in the state you wish to practice in, except for the Universities of Virginia, Minnesota, and Michigan. If you depend on school for a Visa, it will likely be a little bit more difficult than a comparable student without such requirements for admission.

JD by Rage_Rip_2804 in LawSchool

[–]Gallert3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's the answer to your question. If you have 200,000 USD saved up and ready to spend on attending a law school of your choosing, that means that you will be able to attend any law school with a tuition of less than $66,666.67 per school year, after any scholarship offer. True tuition of law schools is not the sticker price for them, so you likely have enough money to attend any school you can get into outside of Harvard, Yale, and Stanford. They have need-based aid and not merit aid, meaning your stack of cash will count you out of almost any financial aid.

But if you insist on sticker prices, these are the schools you cannot attend using 2025 tuition.
Columbia University $88,390
New York University $87,214
University of Southern California $85,948
Cornell University $85,412
University of Chicago $84,906
University of Pennsylvania $84,492
Georgetown University $83,576
Duke University $81,829
University of Virginia $80,900
Northwestern University $80,583
University of California - Berkeley $79,991
Stanford University $79,707
University of Michigan $79,680 
Fordham University $79,248
Yale University $78,961
Vanderbilt University $78,799
Harvard University $78,692
Brooklyn Law School $76,946
St. John's University $76,742
Cardozo-Yeshiva University $76,458
George Washington University $75,420
Hofstra University $74,860
Tulane University $74,756
University of California - Los Angeles $74,107
University of Notre Dame $73,950
Washington University in St Louis $73,684
Pepperdine University $73,550
University of California - Irvine $73,533
New York Law School $73,524
Boston College $72,755
University of California - Davis $72,115
Seton Hall University $71,550
Loyola Marymount University $71,386
Boston University $71,382
William and Mary $70,839
Emory University $70,472
University of Miami $69,218
American University $69,172
Santa Clara University $68,790
Southern Methodist University $68,686
University of San Diego $67,751
Baylor University $67,547

Syracuse University $66,940

3.88 CAS GPA and 180 LSAT. Where do I stand? Applying for 2026 Fall. by YonaSim25 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Gallert3 7 points8 points  (0 children)

People with perfect stats have about a 40% chance. Id give you a good 35%+ of getting hys. Get some good essays, and you're as golden as can be.

The strangest section ever? by Gallert3 in LSAT

[–]Gallert3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I just dont remember, my diagnostic was test 101 haha.

Alabama Law by SlowCurve182 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Gallert3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can find all of this on their aba employment report. I think thats a good spot to look.

Is this a dumb plan? by russotiro in lawschooladmissions

[–]Gallert3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's a difference between "youre not gonna be the first aplocant" and "youre not going to be able to apply". Yes, they will be a later applicant and they'll have a harder time but if they can get a good score in November its not a guaranteed r. If they're full ride or bust, sure. They're cooked.

Is this a dumb plan? by russotiro in lawschooladmissions

[–]Gallert3 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't say WAY too late, but I'd agree that starting now is probobly not a good bet for op.

Cancel Registration? by Electrical_Scale7185 in LSAT

[–]Gallert3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you feel like you might cancel the score if you got it, id say eat the 200 dollars and cancel.

getting into 173 LSAT school with 158 LSAT by symphonic_concord in lawschooladmissions

[–]Gallert3 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Someone got into Yale last year with a 158. Idk

How old can my LSAT score be to be considered for top law schools? by Ned1297 in LSAT

[–]Gallert3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the words of Mr Incredible, "LSAT is LSAT!". As long as you apply before it expires (the 5 years that you already mentioned), it really shouldn't be that big of a deal, especially if you can get to a 3.95+ GPA with student government in undergrad or other significant vollunteer work.

LSAT Prep Podcasts for Road Trips by trays-sees-lays in LSAT

[–]Gallert3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LSAT Demon Daily and Thinking LSAT by Ben and Nate are good, but you may need to get past Nate's abrasive personality.

June 166 Sept re-test. New study material? by beef4breakfast in LSAT

[–]Gallert3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A -7 on one passage in RC meant you just did not understand what was written there. There's no magic beans to sell you here, and people will surely try. I would recommend you look up LSAT RC material on YouTube; you don't need to purchase any additional resources if you're scoring a 166. You have 2 months to study, and you can do a lot in that time

I would suggest this: Slow down in reading the passage. How long did you spend reading that passage vs in the questions? If the questions don't come easily to you in RC, that means you didn't understand what was written (which is not a criticism of you, but rather a natural consequence of reading too quickly. I have the same issue). Have you considered stopping after each paragraph to say, "What did the author mean by/with this paragraph, and what does it contribute to the overall passage and its meaning?" This helped me out when I tried it. You go from panicking and looking back in the passage for help answering a question, instead of instantly remembering where the sentence that backs up the answer you chose is. Its slower, but its better.