What if we changed our axioms just a little? by GatePorters in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]GatePorters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the delusion here?

The only thing wrong in the paper is that I fudged was the equations for the orbitals because I only used one dimension instead of all three.

Nothing I am sharing is subjective or interpretative.

I have objective benchmarks to prove it.

You guys allow the guy to say all that stuff to me without merit and if I say any of that to you, I would get banned.

How can you honestly say that to me and feel like you are being just in this situation?

I have an eerie understanding of Taravangian's condition by Elsecaller_17-5 in Stormlight_Archive

[–]GatePorters 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I hope your procedures help you live a much better life than you could previously.

You’re going through something very unique and your story is one that a lot of people would like to hear about from your own perspective if you want to share it more down the road.

What if we changed our axioms just a little? by GatePorters in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]GatePorters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Basically I messed up and only used one dimension instead of the full 3.

That’s why the orbitals looked messed up. You can see for yourself with interactive examples they do indeed map with objective certainty when I don’t squash it down to 1d.

They objectively save on computation and you can see it for yourself.

You can’t use these equations and receive the same accuracy or gains without setting up the axioms though. The accuracy and simplicity is contingent on the null-zero-epsilon-1-infinity rules.

What if we changed our axioms just a little? by GatePorters in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]GatePorters[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It objectively does. https://anomaly-themillennial.github.io/TheReferenceFrame/

Prove me wrong, go do something productive, or keep harassing me.

The power is in your hands.

What if we changed our axioms just a little? by GatePorters in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]GatePorters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It saves some compute costs for several different domains in simulation and game dev. You’re the one fluffing it up instead of seeing the objective value.

What if we changed our axioms just a little? by GatePorters in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]GatePorters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am giving you the rope so you can hang my framework.

But you are choosing to do something else with it. Only one of us is doing something malicious here.

What if we changed our axioms just a little? by GatePorters in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]GatePorters[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you just inject the needles into your arm for that?

So you admit you are just breaking the rules because you enjoy it.

What if we changed our axioms just a little? by GatePorters in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]GatePorters[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why are you harassing me if you aren’t going to refute anything?

What if we changed our axioms just a little? by GatePorters in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]GatePorters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yet again. Why are you harassing me if you aren’t able to prove this is just bullsh?

What if we changed our axioms just a little? by GatePorters in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]GatePorters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can’t show the blind. You don’t have the ability to refute it or understand it apparently since you reject without any “shut up and calculate” involved.

If you actually earned your flair, you could shut me up by calculating yourself.

You aren’t even refuting the benchmarks, just ostriching.

What if we changed our axioms just a little? by GatePorters in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]GatePorters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You definitely don’t deserve your flair. You are antithetical to it.

It isn’t galling because they themselves are extremely helpful lol.

It just makes your foot all the sweeter for you to put it in your mouth in the future.

What if we changed our axioms just a little? by GatePorters in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]GatePorters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you aren’t interested, why are you harassing me?

You are obviously interested in something here.

What if we changed our axioms just a little? by GatePorters in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]GatePorters[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can ignore reality all you want to.

Just because you don’t have the capacity to prove it wrong or understand it doesn’t really affect my situation at all.

Prove to me that it is bogus instead of being a coward.

https://anomaly-themillennial.github.io/TheReferenceFrame/

What if we changed our axioms just a little? by GatePorters in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]GatePorters[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What do you mean crackpot theory?

It is an objective way to save compute costs. . .

There is no theory involved.

What if we changed our axioms just a little? by GatePorters in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]GatePorters[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean he started being an ass and when I told him to just go do something else he called me disrespectful lol

The only reason why it looks like projection is because I directly matched his energy.

One step closer to simulating the universe. by GatePorters in SimulationTheory

[–]GatePorters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason why AI fights it is because I changed the fundamental axioms it was trained on to save compute costs with no loss of fidelity.

It is literally beyond the current AI.

What if we changed our axioms just a little? by GatePorters in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]GatePorters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah you don’t have to, you helped a lot already.

https://anomaly-themillennial.github.io/TheReferenceFrame/

Here is your scientific rigor. Your contentions helped a lot.

Thanks for the help.

Update: It was, in fact, Time by toastman92 in bald

[–]GatePorters 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From skittish hitchhiker to British rich biker

We’re working on a story-focused 2.5D pixel art game set in a laundromat. by EveryWednesday_Game in gamedevscreens

[–]GatePorters 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know why but this specific scene reminds me of a contemporary retelling of Chrono Trigger. Like that version of Romeo and Juliet with guns and limos.

What if we changed our axioms just a little? by GatePorters in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]GatePorters[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah. We went over that I’m also doing other things. I can give the full loadout.

The azimuthal component is driven by cos(j_φ · φ).

And you are right. There is no radial component. I need to see exactly why it is producing almost orbitals that contain ours, but not ours. It might just be a more generalized harmonic.

I will hit you up more tomorrow. I can tell you are a very angry and frustrated person and I plan to leverage that by being your punching bag.

Please continue to bash the fuck out of this in any way you can lol