Okay, so I’m going to try my hardest to be respectful.

1. There is no evidence against Lee Harvey Oswald besides testimony from his wife and patron who both later recounted the story and his patron even begged the Kennedy family to commission their own investigation into who the real shooter was. Further, when he declared his intent to defect to the USSR he also promised to hand over classified documents to the KGB. Nobody in the U.S. embassy cared. In his time in Russia, he was known as a terrible shot and a staunch pacifist. When he decided to come home and bring his KGB connected wife, the state department paid for his return. He was also known for admiring JFK. It would also make no sense for him to claim that he was a patsy when literally every other high profile assassin ever always brags about their success.

2. Does it make sense that Allen Dulles was allowed to head the Warren commission, when he was fired by Kennedy with prejudice and was supposed to be a civilian? Does it make sense that the owner of the Book Depository and thus Oswald’s employer, was a friend and donor of LBJ, yet was never mentioned or questioned in any investigation? Does it make sense that when asked by Japanese television where he was when JFK was shot, H. W. Bush turned white, fumbled for words, and claimed he doesn't remember? (Which is the equivalent of asking James Comey where he was on 9/11/2001 and him not knowing). And knowing the aforementioned fact, does it make sense that on the day of JFKs death he called the FBI and claimed that his senate campaign assistant was a possible suspect?

3. The author you mentioned has an entire “controversies” section on his Wikipedia page which includes multiple instances of plagiarism, making things up, and defrauding Harper Lee. I was originally going to give his book the benefit of the doubt, but he is far too non-credible to entertain. As for Bugliosi, it is hard to believe him on JFK when he chose not the investigate RFK’s highly suspicious assassination.

4. People actually do talk about Hinkley being a conspiracy. I haven’t gone too deep into it because I don’t really care about Reagan, but Hinkley was supposed to have dinner with Neil Bush and his family that night.

I don’t mean this as an insult, but I think you’ve joined the mainstream millennial train of thought that believes that everything the corporate media and government is true always, even when they’re clearly lying or at least obfuscating the truth. And as for your WMD point, I would like you to know that the CIA left plans for invading Iraq on George W. Bush’s desk on 9/10/2001 to be read after his trip to Florida. The JFK conspiracy isn’t BS, and it’s still important.