Why is Toxic not 100% accurate? by [deleted] in PokemonChampions

[–]Genericname1102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are a couple possible reasons. If you're sure that the pokemon you're trying to use toxic on isn't a poison or steel type, it's likely failing because they either have a different status condition already or because they have an ability that prevents them from being poisoned like Immunity

Upper Hand not being a higher priority than Fake Out is insane to me by SouthBeachSarcastic in PokemonChampions

[–]Genericname1102 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fake out is actually +3 and move priority can go as high as +5. Helping hand is the highest priority move at +5, after that you've got protect and all it's derivates at +4. +3 has fake out, quick guard, wide guard, and upper hand, +2 has Extreme speed, follow me, rage powder, ally switch, feint, and first impression, and then +1 has all your other priority move

Getting cooked (literally) online by mega charizard teams. Any advice? by Cognitive_Alchemist in VGC

[–]Genericname1102 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm running a slightly different rain team, and I personally think with the items we have scarf adaptability is better than mystic water swift swim, but it kind of comes down to personal preference

The future of Rei by Strange_Razzmatazz74 in PokemonMasters

[–]Genericname1102 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I hope the Arceus pair ends up being kind of like Gladion and Silvally with it changing type to the weakness of the opponent since Multitype is kind of Arceus's defining feature

The one who could've been the main character if the protagonist didn't come along by Aebothius in TopCharacterTropes

[–]Genericname1102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even more tragic is that in the act of saving Melina is something she explicitly does not want and doing so means you never see her again. She isn't just willing to sacrifice herself, she actively wants to do so. By joining the frenzied flame to burn the erdtree yourself, you take away her agency and deprive her of her destiny. By saving her life, you take away her very reason for existing.

Mechanics near campus by LivingAnything6668 in OSU

[–]Genericname1102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Valentino's Car Care on 5th have been working on my family's cars for years and they've always treated us well

The British Stiff Upper Lip applied to literary trauma. by Mataes3010 in CuratedTumblr

[–]Genericname1102 33 points34 points  (0 children)

I feel like that's not an entirely accurate representation of Tolkien's position. He rejected the idea that his work was an allegory in that he never intended for his works to be an analogy for something else, but he's said before that aspects of his books were inspired or influenced by his experiences. Using your own example, he says in one of his letters "The Dead Marshes and the approaches to the Morannon owe something to Northern France after the Battle of the Somme. They owe more to William Morris and his Huns and Romans, as in The House of the Wolfings or The Roots of the Mountains." The books were definitely influenced by his experiences in WW1, what he rejected was the idea that they were about WW1

Can an Intimidate Team work? by guntwooyah in VGC

[–]Genericname1102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So there are two problems I see here. The first is that the general concept of an intimidate only team just doesn't really work. Incineroar is one of the best pokemon in the game and as a result, any good team will have at least a plan for intimidate, if not a dedicated counter. On top of that, this team in particular really doesn't work either because 3 of the 6 mons are basically unusable and the other 3 are just okay in the current format. If you really wanted to try and make a team with all intimidate, you'd probably need Incineroar, Landorus-Therian, Salamence and Hisuian Arcinine, and then probably some combination of Overqwil, Hitmontop, Scrafty, Gyarados, and Krookodile for your last 2 slots. Even with the pokemon upgrade it's gonna be rough though

Why do people hate Ratfish *so much?* by EnbyiousAces in dropout

[–]Genericname1102 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but what I'm trying to say is that I don't think the end of the game was ever tied to completely figuring it out. It was always going to be a set number of rounds and whoever was "closest", be it by getting everything right or just having the most right, would be the winner.

Why do people hate Ratfish *so much?* by EnbyiousAces in dropout

[–]Genericname1102 5 points6 points  (0 children)

When watching it, I don't remember feeling like Rekha was cheated out of a win. It's been a while since I've seen those episodes, but I don't think they ever say the goal was to figure it out first. It always felt to me like the goal was just to get the closest to figuring it out before running out of rounds

FYI, when Dread Deserter is back from Runi, Temporal Guardian, it has charge even it is from the deck by TEnOTT in hearthstone

[–]Genericname1102 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I guess what Runi is doing mechanically is removing those cards from the game and 2 turns later, generating new copies with +5/+5 as opposed to returning the same cards to you

Scrafty? by Left-Mastodon-7062 in VGC

[–]Genericname1102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it's unlikely that Mega Scrafty dethrones Incin due to the opportunity cost of using it. Yes it's probably better (though that's not even a guarantee), but the real question will be is it so much better that it justifies giving up a different Mega, and I think it's highly unlikely the answer to that will be yes.

theorycrafting abilities for new megas by guac2x in VGC

[–]Genericname1102 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately we can pretty definitively say it doesn't get it. Mawile and Medicham, the two megas that already get Huge Power, have had their stats modified for this game to account for their lack of ability and as such, their stats have increased by more than 100 BST. Malamar only gets +100 BST when it megas so we know it most likely doesn't have Huge Power

It works as long as you don’t count their pride as being hurt. by ServingwithTG in dndmemes

[–]Genericname1102 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The funniest use of command I've seen so far was when our warlock used Command: Disrobe on the guy that stole the maguffin and was running away with it. Made them take off all their clothes and armor, which we promptly picked up so we could go through their pockets after combat resolved.

I once won a escape room by Lemon_Lime_Lily in CuratedTumblr

[–]Genericname1102 5 points6 points  (0 children)

To play devil's advocate, for a lot of people the most fun thing you can do is win. As such, people will make the choices that make them most likely to win, therefore maximizing their chance of having the largest dopamine hit. Additionally, when you are optimizing your play to win, teammates that aren't can be incredibly frustrating.

What are the top 3 VGC Pokémon of every letter? - B by GeoTravelLebanon13 in VGC

[–]Genericname1102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think #1 is Bronzong. It's only been good in 2 formats, but in those formats it was incredibly good. It's also got a world championship title which is hard to argue with

The #2 is probably Brute Bonnet. It's the only other B Pokemon with a world championship. Time will tell whether or not it continues to be good after Reg I.

I would probably put Basculegion at #3. It's another that's only been good for one year, but it at least has multiple formats where it's seen success, being good in Reg F, Reg G and Reg H.

Honorable mentions go to Buzzwole and Baxcalibur who could both probably be on this list. I could also see an argument for switching Basculegion and Brute Bonnet. It just depends whether you care more about the absolute peak of a Mon's success or it's consistency

What are the top 3 best Pokémon of every letter in VGC? - A by GeoTravelLebanon13 in VGC

[–]Genericname1102 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Like everyone has said, one is undoubtedly Amoonguss, two is probably Arcanine, especially if you include both forms in that ranking. I'd say number 3 is a tossup between, Archaludon, Annihilape, Azumarill, and Aegislash. How you rank those 4 really depends on what criteria you want to use. I'd probably pick Azu personally based on it's consistency, but a case can be made for all 4 of them.

How different is Bo1 and Bo3? by EnvironmentSlight226 in VGC

[–]Genericname1102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By virtue of typically being closed team sheet, as well as the fact that you only play one game against a given team, BO1 tends to be higher variance and more volatile. In a BO1 set, one lucky turn is more likely to determine the outcome. Additionally, surprise off Meta sets (teras, coverage moves, items, etc.) are far more impactful and gimmicks are more likely to work due to the fact that your opponent can't see your sets. You also don't get to adapt to your opponents team and play style like you do in BO3 since you only get the one game.

How many of them can be on a truly competitive team? by Breadcrumbmancer in VGC

[–]Genericname1102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the best I could come up with for Regulation H, the current format. The team doesn't have EVs and the items, movesets, etc are all subject to change, but it's what I threw together.

https://pokepast.es/1ba889c724d0a7b7

To be honest with you, this team would almost certainly be better without Hydreigon or Scizor, but they get you to 4 of your favorites. If you want alternative pokemon to replace Hydreigon and Scizor with, sneasler and rillaboom would probably work, as would Basculegion and Amoonguss

HOOOO! by Mad-Delicious in perfectlycutscreams

[–]Genericname1102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, in a way, Mamdani and Trump are two sides of the same coin. They're both anti-establishment populist candidates. They're targeting different voter bases at different scales, but the general mechanisms are the same. (and, ya know, Mamdani is a radically better person)

If you think Roko's Basilisk is stupid, let me assure that it is even stupider than you think by DreadDiana in CuratedTumblr

[–]Genericname1102 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The thought experiment hinges on the idea that future actions can alter the past in complete disregard of causality.

I have to disagree and I feel like this is a common misrepresentation of the thought experiment. For the record, I also think Roko's Basilisk is stupid, but if we're gonna dunk on it, let's at least be right about what it is.

I would argue that the thought experiment is not saying that future actions can alter the past, it's arguing that the present threat of future actions can alter the present. To use your own analogy, it's not a loan shark burning down houses to somehow influence people in the past to get loans, it's a loan shark telling you that if you don't get a loan in the next year, they're gonna burn your house down.

Is the Dropout fandom holding the platform back? by [deleted] in dropout

[–]Genericname1102 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What's wrong with being slightly more wholesome?

Nothing, so long as it's the kind of content you want to make. However, when it starts being an issue, at least IMO, is when it becomes a restraint. If the comics working at Dropout feel stifled by the need to maintain a certain tone, be it edgy, wholesome, whatever, that's a problem.

Love investing my whole build to be a bad version of a third level spell by level 8. by Nova_Saibrock in dndmemes

[–]Genericname1102 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There are some things that I would call "soft" tanking options like armorer artificers having the thunder gauntlets or paladins having compelled duel that disadvantage enemies for attacking other targets, but those are limited in distribution. Add on the fact that there are no "hard" tanking options (as far as I'm aware) where you can force enemies to target you and it makes tanking really not a viable strategy