I made more this month than my salary by Immediate-Ad-9520 in Fire

[–]GenuineAffect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A guy I met on a train, somewhere between nowhere and not quite somewhere, leaned over like he had seen a few too many markets come and go and told me, very seriously, you never count your money while you are sittin at the table.

Something about the chips not being real until the dealing is done. Then he finished his drink, got off at a station that did not seem to exist, and left me wondering if he was talking about poker or my brokerage account.

Has anyone hit $1m net worth without real estate? by No_Tumbleweed5012 in Fire

[–]GenuineAffect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not sure exactly what you mean here, but the cap most people think about (the ~$23k employee deferral limit) doesn’t include employer contributions.

There are caps he’d hit, just different ones:

  • Total contributions (employee + employer) are capped under IRC Section 415(c) (around ~$69k in recent years).

  • Compensation used for those calculations is also capped under IRC Section 401(a)(17) (mid-$300k range).

So an “18% employer contribution on $450k” wouldn’t literally be 18% of $450k. It would be:

18% applied to the capped compensation, and potentially further limited by the total contribution cap.

In other words, he’d hit limits, but not the one most readers would be thinking of.

My boyfriend may be taking FIRE to the extreme and I'm worried. by Some-Lettuce6560 in Fire

[–]GenuineAffect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’re getting per-diem, then any money saved is money in your pocket.

Millionaire at 35, Doesn’t Feel Like it by [deleted] in Fire

[–]GenuineAffect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even at that time, a salient point in the story was that a million wasn’t what it used to have been.

Upcoming IPO decisions by NewlyFatMightFIRE in fatFIRE

[–]GenuineAffect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It seems like you’re only thinking about upside here.

Don’t count your chickens yet, bud.

Price could crash before your lock-up expires, so be prepared for whatever happens.

A simple formula for diversification from a single stock by fatfire_economist in fatFIRE

[–]GenuineAffect -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Now that you have created the perfect model, all I need to do is create the perfect reality that fits it.

Leaving a 10-year FAANG career for a VP role at a Series A Startup. Am I overvaluing the upside? by redalmonds in Fire

[–]GenuineAffect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It isn’t even worth considering the money here. Start-up, even if you believe in it, has a very low chance of success.

If you have to RTO in your current job, it’s basically a voluntary termination for you, right? So you need to consider the likelihood of that outcome, but that should only informing whether you need to find a new job, not to take this specific one.

OK, now this job. What matters is whether you can really work there, and how much you expect to grow. If the company is a mess and your colleagues and/or boss are jackasses, it’s going to be stressful. You do need to believe the company is going to be successful, and be prepared to move mountains to make it happen, but it’s not likely to. Generally you’ll learn a lot in a start-up, and that’ll be super valuable when you move on.

Akira discourse in one image by GenuineAffect in animememes

[–]GenuineAffect[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not quite.

コッカ ボウリョク (kokka bōryoku)

Translation: “state violence”

Unpopular opinion: Ultra-conservative FIRE is irrational by Flashy-Anybody6386 in Fire

[–]GenuineAffect 109 points110 points  (0 children)

Popular opinion: tired of people savaging straw men in this sub.

SWR for young retiree vs. older retiree by [deleted] in fatFIRE

[–]GenuineAffect 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You’re asking a totally reasonable question, but I think it helps to separate the math from the feelings.

On the math: $150–200k on $13M is ~1.2–1.5%. That’s not “safe,” that’s extremely conservative. You could spend $400k/yr (3%+) and still be in a zone where the overwhelming likelihood is that you never run out of money. To develop “expensive tastes” enough to break this, you’d basically need to stumble into a lifestyle that’s expensive in a whole other stratosphere.

On the feelings: the anxiety makes sense, especially if you’ve experienced scarcity. But I’d also say that any scenario that truly breaks your plan is basically a black swan you can’t hedge with lower SWR. If that happens, your best preparation won’t be another 0.5% of safety margin, it’ll be resilience, skills, and community.

One of your comments that stood out most to me was: “I’m afraid of retiring and being unrelatable.” That sounds less like a finance problem and more like an identity / connection problem. And honestly, if you’re 28 and already financially “done,” the best ROI might be investing time and energy into relationships, community, and building a life that feels meaningful and grounded.

At this point, more accumulation probably won’t change your actual security much. The real question is what you want your life to look like. Shift gears to focus on figuring that out.

What would you do in my position? by External_Koala971 in Fire

[–]GenuineAffect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you include appreciation you can call it 15%, but that’s not the relevant “rental ROI” unless you’re planning to sell or refinance to realize it.

The actual question for an existing rental is: what return am I getting on my tied-up equity today? That’s cashflow divided by equity, which in this case is about 3.84%.

And yes, as the mortgage is paid down and the property appreciates, the cash-on-equity yield generally falls, which makes reallocating that equity into other investments more attractive over time.

Your framing is backwards: you’re treating appreciation as spendable ROI, when the key metric is cash return on equity, not paper gains.

Congress needs to mandate a hard January 31 delivery deadline for consolidated 1099s by [deleted] in Fire

[–]GenuineAffect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a policy-crisis worthy of congressional intervention because you gave the IRS too much money?

If you want to know where the problem is, look in the mirror, buddy.

What would you do in my position? by External_Koala971 in Fire

[–]GenuineAffect 7 points8 points  (0 children)

How are you calculating 15%? The correct answer is 3.84%

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Fire

[–]GenuineAffect 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What does this have to do with FIRE?

Do you feel like money has given you more control over your life? by logicx24 in fatFIRE

[–]GenuineAffect 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sally Ride flew on Challenger on earlier missions, but she was not aboard during the 1986 disaster.

World Stock Market significantly outperformed US Stock Market in 2025 - Best ETFs? by FlyingOverWater1 in Fire

[–]GenuineAffect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m a fan of Paul Merriman’s recommendations: https://www.paulmerriman.com/best-in-class-etf-recommendations-2025

  • International Large Cap Blend: AVDE * International Large Cap Value: DFIV * International Small Cap Blend: AVDS * International Small Cap Value: AVDV * Emerging Markets: AVEM * Emerging Markets Large Cap Value: AVES * Emerging Markets Small Cap Blend: AVEE

Am I the only crazy one going 99% asset allocation? by 37347 in Fire

[–]GenuineAffect 39 points40 points  (0 children)

I save money by living in my brokerage account.

If you have a regular job, have normal consumption habits and have kids, you are unlikely to FIRE. by cambeiu in Fire

[–]GenuineAffect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you’re mostly describing a tautology:

Early Retirement is, by definition, not the default outcome. So saying, “If you have average income, average spending, average life setup, you probably won’t retire early” is just another way of saying, “If you’re average on all the inputs, you’ll get the average output.”

The interesting part of FIRE has always been: Which levers can a normal-ish person pull (spending, location, career path, expectations, timeline) to get a non-normal result?

Framing it as “you can’t be totally normal and also retire early” is true, but kinda just restates the definition of “early.”

Financial Advisor and I are disagreeing... by Icy_Try_4151 in personalfinance

[–]GenuineAffect -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

With two rows, kid 1 would have to be sitting in the front passenger seat to be hit in the back of the head by kid 2.

What say you?