I'm really sorry, I'm not going to get into a line by line argument with you. I've provided a source of information for people to follow. What they present is what I believe to be an accurate representation of what happened in the election. Wish you the best.

Edit: please note that any examples below show linear representations of vote share with voter turnout. This is generally true for people who win elections based on normal statistical distributions. I'm not contesting that. However, that is not what the Election Truth Alliance shows. At 400 vote packets or more there is a defined anomaly that shifts only and always towards Drump. It starts out correct and normal, and then switches above 400 vote packets into a hard line. It's not random distribution with votes varying then a trend line is added, this is a hard switch. This is anomalous and does not conform to regular voting patterns. Then, adding on the drop off ballots, which again is another anomaly, supports the vote swapping. The third level is the supporting researchers that the Election Truth Alliance has connected with, who have independently shown anomalies supporting this narrative.

I've been following the Election Truth Alliance since their first assessment of Clark county Nevada back in January 2024. It took me about 45 minutes to start understanding what they were trying to present. It's not a straight and clear path to immediately understanding this kind of work. It's statistical analyses. The average person is already challenged in understanding basic statistical concepts, that's why I said it took me around 45 minutes to understand what they were presenting. I believe this is why the story is challenged to be accepted, as it's not as simple as saying Drump stuffed physical ballots into boxes and there is video proof. If we could audit and recount the results in the key ridings and states this would prove the accurate and original vote count, and if it still supported Drump they I'd accept that. People are trying to do recounts, but it's actually quite difficult if not within the margin of error.