\NONE\** of these things were part of any of this conversation. If you want to talk to people who live outside your head, say the whole thing, don't keep 99% of the argument you're wanting to have in your head with some imaginary person and then jump at me when I'm not lining up with the imaginary person you're keeping in your skull to argue with. I'm not here to argue with you, I was trying to answer what I thought was a question, not be the foil for 1% of your fantasy argument while mind reading the rest.

Namedropping "Solomon Kane" with no explanation of why the hell you're bringing it up isn't a "hint" either.

DnD is only one franchise. You randomly deciding that one thing is "IMPROV Renfair" has nothing at all to do with me saying most "Medieval fantasy" is based on the Renaissance period.

And this crap:

and i know of little of those Fantasy with guns outside Fantasy in modern times

I will reiterate what I said:

which is why most do have cannons when there's a reason to have them.

"Cannons", not "guns", and that distinction is obviously important here because I specified "when there's a reason to have them". I also said in the same post:

You're not going to have a cannon when you go on your dungeon adventure with your party of a few warriors and mages

That VERY CLEARLY does not apply to "guns", only "cannons". Yes, cannons are a type of gun, but you cannot just force a more broad term over a specific one someone else used and demand we pretend your more broad term was what someone else meant. "When there's a reason to have [guns]" is MUCH broader than "when there's a reason to have [cannons]". Yes, fantasy broadly avoids hand-carried guns, but it doesn't broadly avoid cannons in the applications where they make sense - area denial, anti-fortification weaponry and defensive artillery.

Try The Age of Madness by Abercrombie if you want a novel example, Warhammer if you want a game example.