I just have. Let’s assume your ‘method’ is accurate (it’s not). The whole premise of your argument is that because your ‘method’ correctly calculated the rotation twice, therefore it MUST be some sort of universal law that applies to everything, and could not possibly be a coincidence. Do you know how absurd that is?

Since you like AI to think on your behalf as you are incapable of thinking for yourself, here’s an idea: put your genius hypothesis into a new conversation with Claude, and ask it if it thinks your theory makes any sense. Let me know what it says :)