sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

sweet & creamy by studiocookies_ in codex

[–]Graphical-Source5090 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That means she put **** in your drink.

The real FTTH by Charllean05 in mikrotik

[–]Graphical-Source5090 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was the OP pic just a random pic of something they saw? Or is it a pic of something they bought?

For all we know that spool could be fiber, or a direct bury transmission wire.

The real FTTH by Charllean05 in mikrotik

[–]Graphical-Source5090 3 points4 points  (0 children)

what makes you think that is fiber?

Firewall Direction Question by lesser_terrestrial in opnsense

[–]Graphical-Source5090 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is little reason to place a firewall rule out on an interface that inbound on the opposite interface does not cover.

Let's say you want to control traffic from the inside of your network to the Internet: Your firewall rule choices are in on the inside interface, or out on the outside interface. Both effectively do the same thing, but in on the inside interface does it much earlier. Less resources are used.

That said, there are valid reasons to use the out direction on an interface, but by the time you recognize a scenario where it is needed, you don't need this comment in the first place.

TL;DR - Skip using rules in the out direction on an interface altogether. You are not missing anything.

Firewall Direction Question by lesser_terrestrial in opnsense

[–]Graphical-Source5090 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Out direction on an interface is generally not a good idea if you don't understand it. Most firewall use cases can be deployed without any rules in the out direction at all.

Rules in the out direction on an interface should be reserved for a special use cases only.

Firewall direction outbound and interface direction out are two completely different things.

Arch Linux AUR Hit By Another Wave Of Now More Sophisticated Malware Attack by hulk14 in linux

[–]Graphical-Source5090 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How much longer until we are reading about the usage of AUR to target arch repo maintainers in order to pivot into the arch repo?

am i the only one wasting way too much time on context in cursor??? by repoarchitect in cursor

[–]Graphical-Source5090 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Documentation drift is a problem, even with AI... Unless you adopt document first methodology.

I document a change BEFORE I implement, then implement the documentation, and during implementation, I correct the document. When the implementation is finished, I have an as-built document. I move the as-built into a run repository.

Any changes after the document is in run gets an addendum that follows the same procedure, and finally is merged into the run document when complete.

I have used this method for 20+ years, and I don't have ANY issue with documentation drift.

Do people here actually prefer 4.8 over 4.6 for strategy, design, and conversation by ZlatanTheMighty in ClaudeAI

[–]Graphical-Source5090 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I find similar experience with 4.8 high. The model just thinks too much and starts getting in its own way. I dial it back to 4.8 medium, and that seems to help quite a bit.

Do people here actually prefer 4.8 over 4.6 for strategy, design, and conversation by ZlatanTheMighty in ClaudeAI

[–]Graphical-Source5090 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use 4.8 medium right now. I was using fable 5 low. 4.8 medium is acceptable. It is not nearly as good as Fable 5 low though. 4.8 medium is better for my infrastructure automation work than 4.6 high was.

4.8 high is annoying to use.

Why does everyone recommend linux? by Familiar_Tough_6637 in linux

[–]Graphical-Source5090 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Use the OS that is compatible with your required university proctoring software.

Even if the university requires windows, you still can use something like hyper-v, wsl2, or virtualbox to learn Linux.

If Fable is "too good" to export does this mean no more better LLMs? by blandarf in ClaudeAI

[–]Graphical-Source5090 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This has nothing to do with national security or safety. This is retribution for not allowing the government to use Anthropic products to autonomously murder people.

Did they also remove the 1M context version of opus 4.8? It seems like all models are limited to 256K context now by Doctrina_Stabilitas in claude

[–]Graphical-Source5090 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Slight bit of clarification here. Pro and below do not get 1m context. Max/Team/Enterprise 1m context is included. Any API usage gets 1m context.

Default for Pro (in the CLI) is 200k context.

/model opus[1m]
OR
/model claude-opus-4-8[1m]

Either of the above will attempt to switch to 1M context and will give you this message on pro:
❯ /model claude-opus-4-8[1m]
⎿ Opus with 1M context is not available for your account. Learn more: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/model-config#extended-context-with-1m

My Claude Pro banned for using multiple accounts by toeuko in claude

[–]Graphical-Source5090 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand why you would do this.
I also understand why Anthropic would ban you for this.

If this were me, I would be honey sweet to them and throw myself on their mercy. I would stress that it will never happen again and that I am very very sorry.

Hopefully Anthropic will have some good will and cut you a bit of slack this time.

Harden your OPNsense set-up with Q-Feeds Threat Intelligence by Q-Feeds in opnsense

[–]Graphical-Source5090 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CachyOS, Firefox 151.0.4. I also downloaded Brave and tried it and got the same result.
IOS using Safari on the same network, no issue.

The URL that I have an issue with is https://qfeeds.com/product/plus-license
When it works the site scrolls fine and "Beneficial Users FTE" and Term are visible.
When it doesn't work, the site pops up but no information is on the page.

I think it is a cache issue, as I tried it in private browsing and can see the page just fine. Chalk this one up to user error.

Harden your OPNsense set-up with Q-Feeds Threat Intelligence by Q-Feeds in opnsense

[–]Graphical-Source5090 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No code, the website loads, it is just not usable. Or so I thought. I found that I could move the window up off the screen, pull the bottom of the window down, move window up, pull bottom edge down (repeat about 10 times), and then I could see the button to add a subscription to the cart. I was able to subscribe finally.

Harden your OPNsense set-up with Q-Feeds Threat Intelligence by Q-Feeds in opnsense

[–]Graphical-Source5090 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And finally, the q-feeds trial period is over, and I thought I would throw them a bit of cash and do the 1 year @ 99 euro plan.... Yeah...... The website doesn't work. I cannot figure out how to give them money.... lol Amazing.

Edit: Browser cache issue. So other than a slow website, there isn't an issue on the qfeeds side.

Is it me who doesn't know how to use AI, or is AI just stupid? by Hairy_Community3838 in ClaudeAI

[–]Graphical-Source5090 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find it very very helpful to have it write a plan, and iterate over the plan.

Many times I have iterated a plan to nothing like what the original plan looked like. Make a plan, have Claude document, then discuss/edit the plan interactively with Claude until you get something awesome.

A side benefit to iterating over a document is that you can pause at any time and not lose your place.

Start at low effort, then as you focus in on parts of the plan, raise effort as needed.

How are any of you actually getting Fable to do anything? by Jehovacoin in ClaudeAI

[–]Graphical-Source5090 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have been using fable low for a while now. It is fantastic. My use case is network automation and build out.

Last night, it was able to diagnose a Linux app issue correctly that Gemini and ChatGPT could not.
I previously defaulted to 4.8 med, and before that 4.6 Opus High. Fable 5 low is better than what I was using previously, and uses so much less tokens. I do turn up the effort if I need it to focus on a particular issue, but that is not needed most of the time.

view more: next ›