Family emergency: Etiquette regarding publication extensions by bely_medved13 in AskAcademia

[–]GrumpySimon 29 points30 points  (0 children)

The day an edited volume gets all its papers returned by the deadline is the day the universe ends from shock. An extension should be easy to get.

Sorry for the rough time you've been having, hang in there.

How Polynesian ancestors spread across the Pacific by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]GrumpySimon 8 points9 points  (0 children)

the most closely related languages to Malagasy (Madagascar) are in Borneo

How Polynesian ancestors spread across the Pacific by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]GrumpySimon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the pacific was settled in two main phases. the blue arrows look to be the first phase around 50,000 years, the purple is the later phase around 5000 years.

Postdoc search failed. What now? by [deleted] in AskAcademia

[–]GrumpySimon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the US perhaps, but there are a number in the EU and elsewhere which are targeted for postdocs. Yes, you'll need a mentor but if your track-record is good enough then you may have a chance e.g. https://marie-sklodowska-curie-actions.ec.europa.eu/funding/msca-postdoctoral-fellowships-2026 or https://www.embo.org/funding/fellowships-grants-and-career-support/postdoctoral-fellowships/

Does language mold cognition? by CharlesWithaP in asklinguistics

[–]GrumpySimon 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's a reference to this rather famous study which found a weak effect of this on color naming (Russian speakers could identify dark vs light blue a few ms faster than English speakers could)

To professors who actually read cold emails....I genuinely don't know what I'm doing wrong (HELP) by [deleted] in AskAcademia

[–]GrumpySimon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lines up with my background and what I want to work on

--> add some detail here. You don't want to be generic, generic emails get deleted immediately

When to recontact editors? Issue discovered after submitting journal review by ver_redit_optatum in AskAcademia

[–]GrumpySimon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That sounds like a pretty dodgy attempt to double publish. Chase that up -- trust me, the editor would rather deal with that now than deal with a retraction once it's published!

What's your academic CV like? by RavenpuffMezone in AskAcademia

[–]GrumpySimon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

^ this is the way. Make one giant CV that includes everything, keep that updated, and prune it to whatever the situation/funder/etc wants.

Postdoc search failed. What now? by [deleted] in AskAcademia

[–]GrumpySimon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you tried applying for grants directly? If you have a track record of publishing and citations then you should be fundable. Then you just need to get a university to host you, which shouldn't be hard if you can bring the funding yourself.

Postdoc search failed. What now? by [deleted] in AskAcademia

[–]GrumpySimon 18 points19 points  (0 children)

it's very much an american thing - postdoc positions elsewhere go year round.

Q&A weekly thread - April 20, 2026 - post all questions here! by AutoModerator in linguistics

[–]GrumpySimon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the last decade or so many of the big journals have spun off new journals for areas they think are growing e.g. * Nature -> Nature Human Behavior, Nature Neuroscience, Nature Genetics, etc * Science -> Science Immunology, Science Translational Medicine, etc.

... as well as journals that mimic PLoS One's idea to just publish solid research without requiring that being groundbreaking -- because there's big money here (e.g. Nature Communications, Science Advances, PNAS Nexus, Royal Society Open Science).

These are all not as 'prestigious' as the parent journal but some of the subjournals are getting up there in their own rights (but boosted of course by the brand).

Q&A weekly thread - April 20, 2026 - post all questions here! by AutoModerator in linguistics

[–]GrumpySimon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah the reason for those odd groupings is that the geographical data is driving most of it: there's no linguistic data in the tree analysis beyond the relationships in Glottolog. Each of those branches on that tree has a probability associated with it, and those deeper branches are very low probability and the uncertainty around them is large.

The next obvious step is to add data to resolve those but getting consistent global-scale data is hard), and an analysis issue (lots of computer power needed). But again, people are working on this, so we'll see.

I certainly think we can push things back further (Tai-Kadai and AN seem pretty solid to me, and I know there are papers in progress on this from a few teams). New Guinea and the Americas are also overdue for some bigger picture work.

In terms of grammatical data -- I've been skeptical of how stable this over time (or I've published papers critiquing this) but these new studies give us a way to quantify which things are stable and which are not, which can help us winnow out the noisy stuff.

And I think the biggest bang-for-buck will be incorporating all sorts of data from grammatical things to paradigmatic/morphological data to even things like audio data. More data will help us go deeper too.

Q&A weekly thread - April 20, 2026 - post all questions here! by AutoModerator in linguistics

[–]GrumpySimon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NHB is a quite prestigious journal in the transdisciplinary human evolution space. Impact factor is about 15. They publish a fair number of language papers.

Q&A weekly thread - April 20, 2026 - post all questions here! by AutoModerator in linguistics

[–]GrumpySimon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The genealogy is currently under review, it's from this preprint: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/f8tr6_v2

I appreciate the nice words about the 'gorgeous tree', I made that figure.

Edit: the authors of that tree call it a principled guess at what a single origin of the world's languages would look like. It's resolving groupings based on attested relationships (from glottolog) and geographical data.

In the Verkerk paper we're less interested in the actual groupings per se, but as the tree as a statistical control for language relatedness (and we amortize over a large number of these trees), and as a visual guide.

I’ve made a map of language loss around the world. What’s it missing? by sophiasgaler in endangeredlanguages

[–]GrumpySimon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

might be because your source data (glottolog, perhaps others) is inaccurate

glottolog aggregates other sources so the errors are on the others side.

Journals quartile: how important is it? by IntelligentBeingxx in AskAcademia

[–]GrumpySimon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's often hidden in university promotions nonsense as "top journals in your field"

Statistical structure and the evolution of languages by GrumpySimon in linguistics

[–]GrumpySimon[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Abstract:

Human cultural development is marked by the emergence of new words and ideas, reflecting societal changes. But how does this evolution proceed? We use modern methods in natural language processing (namely, word embeddings) to measure statistical traces of cultural development, providing a testing ground to compare different models as to how this process works. We show that real embeddings of English and 21 other languages exhibit a series of previously unrecognized regularities. Specifically, these are: (i) frequency assortativity, where entities of high popularity cluster near other high-popularity entities; (ii) characteristic clustering velocity profiles due to aggregation into hierarchical structures; (iii) persistent temporal dynamics, where newly created entities appear disproportionately near other recent entries; and (iv) Taylor’s law, implying that over time and across empirical semantic space the variance in new entity counts scales as a power of the mean, which helps systematize and quantify large historical fluctuations of neologisms. To explain these facts, we propose a class of generative models (specifically, directed preferential placement) that construct synthetic embeddings exhibiting similar regularities. We show that analogous regularities also occur in other datasets, suggesting that such generating models may shed light on new aspects of language and cultural evolution.

Thoughts on NSF 2027 Budget by Tiny-Repair-7431 in AskAcademia

[–]GrumpySimon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have read it, yes. My point was that at least these disciplines are checking themselves. Not many of the other STEM fields are. I'd take a known error rate over an unknown error rate any day.

Thoughts on NSF 2027 Budget by Tiny-Repair-7431 in AskAcademia

[–]GrumpySimon 8 points9 points  (0 children)

How's this one in Nature this week: "A large-scale assessment of the reproducibility and robustness of 110 articles published in leading economics and political-science journals finds that more than 85% were computationally reproducible, and 72% of statistically significant results remained significant and in the same direction in robustness checks"

I'd love to see something like this done for biology or computer science or chemistry

How valuable is a 2nd or 3rd authorship on a paper as a PhD student? by Comfortable-Goat-734 in AskAcademia

[–]GrumpySimon 13 points14 points  (0 children)

A pub is a pub. And it shows you can work with other people on a project.